Archive for January 13th, 2007

Media boogeymen

Saturday, January 13th, 2007

The self-annointed Conference for Media Reform has been underway in Memphis, spitting out all sorts of invective about big, bad media and pushing for more government regulation, all of which I think is damned dangerous. Big, old media is dying before our eyes and it will take with it local newspapers and broadcast outlets unless it is given the means to survive by more — yes, more — consolidation. And government regulation of speech is always, always dangerous.

FCC Commissioner Michael Copps — one of the big, bad censors of government — issues his manifesto, quoted in the press release sent out about him:

Half a trillion dollars. That’s a conservative valuation of the airwaves that our country lets TV and radio broadcasters use – for free. Any way you slice it, that’s an awful lot of money. In fact, it’s just about the biggest chunk of change that our government gives to any private industry.

And what do the American people – who own the public airwaves, by the way – get in return? Too little news, too much baloney passed off as news. Too little quality entertainment, too many people eating bugs on reality TV. Too little local and regional music, too much brain-numbing national play-lists. Too little of America, too much of Wall Street and Madison Avenue. That’s what we get for half a trillion dollars. It’s one hell of a bad bargain, don’t you think?

Except that with only 12 percent of Americans not getting their TV via cable or satellite — and now the internet — the value of those broadcast licenses is falling to nil before our very eyes. Why the hell do you think that the networks are taking to distributing their wares on iTunes and YouTube? This is a man in charge of our media landscape? God help us. He continues:

I’m here to propose that we replace the bad old bargain that past FCCs struck with the media moguls with a new American Media Contract. It goes like this. We, the American people have given broadcasters free use of the nation’s most valuable spectrum, and we expect something in return. We expect this:

1. A right to media that strengthens our democracy
2. A right to local stations that are actually local
3. A right to media that looks and sounds like America
4. A right to news that isn’t canned and radio playlists that aren’t for sale
5. A right to programming that isn’t so damned bad so damned often

So you’re going to start programming those stations, Commissioner Copps? You’re going to define democracy-strengthening programming, local programming, programing that looks like America, programming that isn’t canned, programming that isn’t bad? Who the fuck are you to determine any of that? You are of the government. And the last thing government should do is meddle in our speech. Besides, all you’re going to do is drive these companies out of business or drive them away from broadcast, just as you did Howard Stern. And what happened next? We got worse programming. Duller programming. Crap and pap. Money-losing programming that only forces the company quicker to the can you decry. Next, we’ll end up with home-shopping on our broadcast towers. That’ll be all that’s left.

Next, we have Bill Moyers spouting downright offensive language, dimishing slavery to make his point. Says the press release sent out about his speech:

Evoking the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Moyers compared big media corporations to plantation owners and American media consumers to their slaves. “What happened to radio, happened to television, and then it happened to cable. If we are not diligent, then it will happen to the Internet, [creating] a media plantation for the 21st century dominated by the same corporate and ideological forces that have controlled the media for the last 50 years.”

Dennis Kucinich isn’t stopping at reforming American media. He is after world domination:

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D- Ohio) paid a surprise visit to the National Conference for Media Reform and announced to hundreds of cheering activists that the U.S. House will created a committee on media reform and that Kucinich will be its chair. He promised reform in media and said it would drive national reform and world reform.

I’m all in favor of openness. But government regulation of what we can say is not open. That is media oppression.

Big media is dying, don’t you see? Knight Ridder’s dead. Tribune’s dying. Scripps is getting out of the newspaper business. Classified revenue is gone from newspapers and leaving online sites. Evil Clear Channel sold itself. CBS Radio is a mess. The TV networks are desperate to find new distribution. Local TV news stations are about to hit the wall. Cable is not far behind. Even Yahoo is struggling. These people are making big, bad media a boogeyman and in doing so they are setting up government to come in and regulate our speech for no good reason. Fools. Damned dangerous fools.

: The conference blog quotes this:

This conference is life-changing. I cannot even breathe right now. Life-changing. I’ll have a series of pictures from Memphis in just a few minutes. What I’ve seen so far has been awe-inspiring. I really feel validated for the feelings I’ve had for the last few years.

Whew.

YouTube for the defense

Saturday, January 13th, 2007

Another fascinating use of YouTube: A public defender representing a prisoner at Gitmo makes a video presenting his defense. Of course, it’s just one side. But it’s an effective use of the medium.

Summarizing the bad news

Saturday, January 13th, 2007

The Week magazine has an excellent summary of the state of newspapers, starting with this compacted bad news:

Twenty years ago, total daily newspaper circulation in the U.S. was 60 million. Today, it is 43.7 million, and many of the nation’s top newspapers are feeling the sharpest pain. Since 1996, the daily circulation of The Washington Post has dropped by 16.8 percent. The Los Angeles Times has lost nearly 25 percent of its readers, while the Chicago Tribune has dropped 15.3 percent. Many newspapers in smaller communities have gone under or been absorbed by their competitors. In 1985, some 140 towns and cities in the U.S. had more than one local paper. By 1995, that figure had dropped to 62. The Pew Research Center found that only 23 percent of people under age 30 read a newspaper daily compared to 60 percent of older people. “Newspaper readers are dying off faster than they can be replaced,” says industry analyst John Morton.

YouTubeTV

Saturday, January 13th, 2007

The Guardian says YouTube is thinking about starting a TV channel. Insert uproar from contributors over sharing in the riches here. I’ll be it will be livelier than Current.

TVJersey’s birth

Saturday, January 13th, 2007

As near as I can tell, the first videos submitted to the Star-Ledger’s TVJersey blog are of a baby sleeping and hiccupping. Well, I guess that’s what a local newspaper’s all about: getting your name in the paper.

Blogging behind gauze

Saturday, January 13th, 2007

This is the problem with big organizations blogging: Somebody’s going to say something somebody wishes hadn’t been said and then the veil is going to fall over the organization’s blogs, causing them to shift from transparency to translucence. See what the Guardian is reporting on the rival Telegraph’s blogs.

The Daily Telegraph launched a crackdown on its bloggers today, ordering them not to blog about the paper and exercise caution about revealing journalistic “tricks of the trade” as it sought to limit the fallout from relevations about its reporting of Saddam Hussein’s execution.

The crackdown comes in the wake of the US editor Toby Harnden’s blog about Saddam Hussein’s execution, where he admitted that he filed a report about the dictator’s execution hours before the dictator was hanged.

His story appeared in the Daily Telegraph on December 30. Saddam was hanged in the early hours of that morning – but after Harnden’s deadline and the piece contained several inaccuracies, including stating that the dictator was hooded when he died.

I can’t find that post but I’d think that would be rather a perfect case for blogging: transparently revealing the process of news, especially when it makes a wrong turn. The Guardian continues:

Today the paper’s web news editor, Shane Richmond, sent a memo to bloggers and feedback staff warning them not to blog about the Telegraph.

“Please avoid blogging about your relationship with your employer, whether the Telegraph Media Group as an entity, ‘the desk’ or ‘my boss’, even in jest. Such comments are frequently misconstrued and can easily backfire,” the memo stated.

“Think carefully before blogging about journalistic ‘tricks of the trade’. “We don’t want to discourage this because it is one of the things people enjoy reading on the blogs but please be aware of anything that could be misunderstood or turned against you.”

The memo then advised bloggers to run their blogs past an editor before posting.

The blogging kiss o’ death. Shane’s a damned good blogger himself (and the ‘graph’s collection of blogs is also good), so I’d quite like to see him talk about this on his blog. But I’ll bet that would be sensitive. And it would have to be edited. And we know where that goes.

Eventually, I think, a newspaper will be less of an organization and more of a network of journalists who have their own voices, brands, and reputations and who can be embraced by the paper or not. That’s when newspaper blogging will work. But until then, it’s a sensitive art.

: Meanwhile, the Guardian and others are delighting in making fun of the pathetic blogging effort of the oddly fuddy-duddyist newspaper in the UK, the Independent. Says Roy Greenslade:

Day after day nothing appears on its blog and the single entry this year turns out to be an updated posting of no consequence. For a paper that likes to be known as a viewspaper it seems rather short of views – or news, or anything at all – on its blog.

: LATER: Andrew Grant-Adamson in the comments points to a blogger who put up the full exchange. Yes, there are clumsy moments. And what gets the writer in trouble is also that gets into a slightly nasty exchange with a reader, which has gotten many a journalist in trouble when they respond, in kind (or anonymously) to pissy readers.

I’m not criticizing the Telegraph or Richmond so much as making the point that this is going to remain tough for institutions. But where we need to end up is with transparency about process and a willingness to have a conversation, eye-to-eye.

T-minus

Saturday, January 13th, 2007

Wandering Brightcove, I came across the prequel for this season’s 24 — which I’m finally going to get into — and it’s an hour’s worth of TV in 10 minutes: a great way to promote the series.

  • Archives