<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging behind gauze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jamesAntenne &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Does corporate media blogging work?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/#comment-311934</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesAntenne &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Does corporate media blogging work?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/#comment-311934</guid>
		<description>[...] For the past six months the BBC have hosted an Editors Blog, among others. Sky News have one, so do Channel 4 News. Newspapers have been in on the act for a while, although not without some awkwardness. Jeff Jarvis talks about the crackdown on Telegraph bloggers. And earlier there was this accidental posting. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For the past six months the BBC have hosted an Editors Blog, among others. Sky News have one, so do Channel 4 News. Newspapers have been in on the act for a while, although not without some awkwardness. Jeff Jarvis talks about the crackdown on Telegraph bloggers. And earlier there was this accidental posting. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/#comment-279749</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/#comment-279749</guid>
		<description>This sort of policy doesn't receive nearly enough attention. A lot of criticism is leveled at reporters for failing to understand, appreciate, or respect the possibilities of the Web. But most professional reporters live in a vise on this question -- which is hardly a new one.

Company policy effectively limits me to writing (on the Web) about anything but what I actually do. And anonymously at that. Looking forward to a cleverly-pseudonymed account of my daily domestic routine? Nor am I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sort of policy doesn&#8217;t receive nearly enough attention. A lot of criticism is leveled at reporters for failing to understand, appreciate, or respect the possibilities of the Web. But most professional reporters live in a vise on this question &#8212; which is hardly a new one.</p>
<p>Company policy effectively limits me to writing (on the Web) about anything but what I actually do. And anonymously at that. Looking forward to a cleverly-pseudonymed account of my daily domestic routine? Nor am I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; To ombud or not to ombud</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/#comment-278719</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; To ombud or not to ombud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 22:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/#comment-278719</guid>
		<description>[...] And there are limits to transparency and openness as last week&#8217;s episode at the Telegraph demonstrates, when a correspondent got nicked for revealing too much about his (flawed) process and for being (too) direct with a reader. The problem in organizational journalism is that the organization abhors transparency; it wants control. And so I have come to believe that it is also necessary to have someone whose role is openness. And then let the insiders compete with their openness, with the knowledge that there is always someone who can ask the uncomfortable question and give the uncomfortable answer (which, after all, is what we expect of everyone we cover). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And there are limits to transparency and openness as last week&#8217;s episode at the Telegraph demonstrates, when a correspondent got nicked for revealing too much about his (flawed) process and for being (too) direct with a reader. The problem in organizational journalism is that the organization abhors transparency; it wants control. And so I have come to believe that it is also necessary to have someone whose role is openness. And then let the insiders compete with their openness, with the knowledge that there is always someone who can ask the uncomfortable question and give the uncomfortable answer (which, after all, is what we expect of everyone we cover). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/#comment-278601</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/#comment-278601</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Andrew,  for the warning here about reverse chronological order in my recording of Toby Harnden's (now withdrawn) blog.  It seemed the most painless way of doing things at the time - more a chronicle than a polished blog. But now traffic to the blog has eased off, I've re-organized it to make it an easier read. 1500 hits in 24 hours !

Colin Berry
www.dreams-and-daemons.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Andrew,  for the warning here about reverse chronological order in my recording of Toby Harnden&#8217;s (now withdrawn) blog.  It seemed the most painless way of doing things at the time - more a chronicle than a polished blog. But now traffic to the blog has eased off, I&#8217;ve re-organized it to make it an easier read. 1500 hits in 24 hours !</p>
<p>Colin Berry<br />
<a href="http://www.dreams-and-daemons.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dreams-and-daemons.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Stabe &#187; links for 2007-01-14</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/#comment-277846</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe &#187; links for 2007-01-14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/#comment-277846</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine: Blogging behind gauze Jeff Jarvis on the Telegraph&#8217;s blogging situation: Iâ€™d think that would be rather a perfect case for blogging: transparently revealing the process of news, especially when it makes a wrong turn.&#8221; (tags: telegraph blogging journalism transparency) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine: Blogging behind gauze Jeff Jarvis on the Telegraph&#8217;s blogging situation: Iâ€™d think that would be rather a perfect case for blogging: transparently revealing the process of news, especially when it makes a wrong turn.&#8221; (tags: telegraph blogging journalism transparency) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Grant-Adamson</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/#comment-277628</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Grant-Adamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 08:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/#comment-277628</guid>
		<description>The point about transparency is right and I have made it, but it in this case it is important to read Toby Harnden's post and the subsequent comments. It has all been chronicled by &lt;a href="http://dreams-and-daemons.blogspot.com/2007/01/telegraph-pulls-toby-harnden-blog.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Colin Berry&lt;/a&gt;. The series of updates means you need to read from the bottom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point about transparency is right and I have made it, but it in this case it is important to read Toby Harnden&#8217;s post and the subsequent comments. It has all been chronicled by <a href="http://dreams-and-daemons.blogspot.com/2007/01/telegraph-pulls-toby-harnden-blog.html" rel="nofollow">Colin Berry</a>. The series of updates means you need to read from the bottom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewingram.com/media &#187; Newspaper blogs: How not to do them</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/#comment-277444</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewingram.com/media &#187; Newspaper blogs: How not to do them</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 03:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/01/13/blogging-behind-gauze/#comment-277444</guid>
		<description>[...] with del.icio.us &#160; &#124; &#160; Email this entry  &#160; &#124; &#160; TrackBack URI &#160; &#124; &#160; Digg it &#160; &#124; &#160; Track with co.mments &#160; &#124; &#160; &#160; &#124; &#160; Cosmos      Click here forcopyright permissions!   Copyright 2006 Mathew Ingram [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with del.icio.us &nbsp; | &nbsp; Email this entry  &nbsp; | &nbsp; TrackBack URI &nbsp; | &nbsp; Digg it &nbsp; | &nbsp; Track with co.mments &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; Cosmos      Click here forcopyright permissions!   Copyright 2006 Mathew Ingram [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
