<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Davos07: Terrorism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/25/davos07-terrorism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/25/davos07-terrorism/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Feinman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/25/davos07-terrorism/#comment-306817</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Feinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2433#comment-306817</guid>
		<description>Hasan:
There have been attempts to crack down on things like money laundering which is why there was such an outcry when it was revealed the the international clearance agency was turning bank records over to the US government.

The reason that such efforts don&#039;t work well are two-fold. first, many money transfers do not use the international banking system, but other parallel and underground paths. Second, the wealthy of the world have a vested interest in keeping much of the banking industry opaque. If it were transparent places like the Bahamas, Bermuda, Lichtenstein and Switzerland would see their banking business disappear. Notice how many deposed dictators walk off with billions that governments can&#039;t (or won&#039;t) try to recover.

The simple rule of thumb is: if there is some perfectly obvious way to fix a social program, yet it doesn&#039;t get fixed, just follow the money to see who is profiting from the status quo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hasan:<br />
There have been attempts to crack down on things like money laundering which is why there was such an outcry when it was revealed the the international clearance agency was turning bank records over to the US government.</p>
<p>The reason that such efforts don&#8217;t work well are two-fold. first, many money transfers do not use the international banking system, but other parallel and underground paths. Second, the wealthy of the world have a vested interest in keeping much of the banking industry opaque. If it were transparent places like the Bahamas, Bermuda, Lichtenstein and Switzerland would see their banking business disappear. Notice how many deposed dictators walk off with billions that governments can&#8217;t (or won&#8217;t) try to recover.</p>
<p>The simple rule of thumb is: if there is some perfectly obvious way to fix a social program, yet it doesn&#8217;t get fixed, just follow the money to see who is profiting from the status quo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hasan Jafri</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/25/davos07-terrorism/#comment-306596</link>
		<dc:creator>Hasan Jafri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2433#comment-306596</guid>
		<description>Jeff - Stellar blogging. I don&#039;t think a reporter -- or his readers -- have had this much fun since Grantland Rice encountered the four horsemen of the apocalypse.

Here is a question for prime minister Aziz and Secretary Chertoff:

I agree with Robert Feinman (comment above) regarding the almost universal trend these days to view terrorism as a movement rather than a technique. But what if we reversed the equation? Instead of taking this macro approach of viewing terrorism as a large, overwhelming mass of angry people, why don&#039;t we break it down as an inventory of techniques and behaviors and map it quantitatively? 

Obviously, these people are able to function as they do because of identifiable behaviors -- money laundering, drug running, stealing, graft, leveraging specific governance deficiencies in bureaucratic structures, etc.
Why cannot the world community isolate those characteristics, as you would, for example, specific cells in a cancer, and attack them separately by devising targeted economic and political solutions?

Example: We hear all the time about the drug crop in Afghanistan. Why can&#039;t we fight it with a subsidy like the one President Bush just accorded corn growers in Iowa? We&#039;re more educated than the terroists, we can outspend the terrorists, and we&#039;re a hell of a lot better connected. Why can&#039;t we stop them from growing dope by incenting other crops?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff &#8211; Stellar blogging. I don&#8217;t think a reporter &#8212; or his readers &#8212; have had this much fun since Grantland Rice encountered the four horsemen of the apocalypse.</p>
<p>Here is a question for prime minister Aziz and Secretary Chertoff:</p>
<p>I agree with Robert Feinman (comment above) regarding the almost universal trend these days to view terrorism as a movement rather than a technique. But what if we reversed the equation? Instead of taking this macro approach of viewing terrorism as a large, overwhelming mass of angry people, why don&#8217;t we break it down as an inventory of techniques and behaviors and map it quantitatively? </p>
<p>Obviously, these people are able to function as they do because of identifiable behaviors &#8212; money laundering, drug running, stealing, graft, leveraging specific governance deficiencies in bureaucratic structures, etc.<br />
Why cannot the world community isolate those characteristics, as you would, for example, specific cells in a cancer, and attack them separately by devising targeted economic and political solutions?</p>
<p>Example: We hear all the time about the drug crop in Afghanistan. Why can&#8217;t we fight it with a subsidy like the one President Bush just accorded corn growers in Iowa? We&#8217;re more educated than the terroists, we can outspend the terrorists, and we&#8217;re a hell of a lot better connected. Why can&#8217;t we stop them from growing dope by incenting other crops?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markbrand</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/25/davos07-terrorism/#comment-306202</link>
		<dc:creator>markbrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 01:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2433#comment-306202</guid>
		<description>One observation is that relgious fanatacism can only be checked by the faith. The Catholic faith has a Pope to manage the fold. It would be beneficial now to restore a Caliph to give governance and integrity to the Islamic faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One observation is that relgious fanatacism can only be checked by the faith. The Catholic faith has a Pope to manage the fold. It would be beneficial now to restore a Caliph to give governance and integrity to the Islamic faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Feinman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/25/davos07-terrorism/#comment-306015</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Feinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2433#comment-306015</guid>
		<description>As long as &quot;terrorism&quot; is discussed as if it were a movement rather than a technique there isn&#039;t going to be much real progress.

If &quot;terrorism&quot; is really a euphemism for Islamic nationalism or theocratic ideas then why not say so? Is the western world opposed to religious groups taking over local governments in general or only to Islamic ones? The right in the US doesn&#039;t seem to have any problems with a Christian inflected government.

How can one ask a weak government to sign a pledge against support of terrorism when it can&#039;t control even internal events? Does anyone think that signing an agreement will make combating radical groups in the Philippines, Indonesia or even Columbia any more effective?

Let&#039;s see all these world leaders come clean on what they really see as they enemy and why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as &#8220;terrorism&#8221; is discussed as if it were a movement rather than a technique there isn&#8217;t going to be much real progress.</p>
<p>If &#8220;terrorism&#8221; is really a euphemism for Islamic nationalism or theocratic ideas then why not say so? Is the western world opposed to religious groups taking over local governments in general or only to Islamic ones? The right in the US doesn&#8217;t seem to have any problems with a Christian inflected government.</p>
<p>How can one ask a weak government to sign a pledge against support of terrorism when it can&#8217;t control even internal events? Does anyone think that signing an agreement will make combating radical groups in the Philippines, Indonesia or even Columbia any more effective?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see all these world leaders come clean on what they really see as they enemy and why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bittorrent</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/25/davos07-terrorism/#comment-305948</link>
		<dc:creator>bittorrent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2433#comment-305948</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the &#039;making us go back to the 12th Century&#039; line one of Tony Blair&#039;s &#039;he wants to destroy our civilisation&#039; lies? 

I was under the impression that Bin Laden wanted the USA and friends to stop interferring in the Middle East? America and Britain are under attack because of the treatment of the Palestinian Arabs, unquestioning support for Israel and our lies over the past 100 years. And now due to our destruction of Iraq, which was based on another lie. Do you see a pattern here? 

If you keep on poking a hornets&#039; nest, don&#039;t be surprised when they eventually fly out and sting you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the &#8216;making us go back to the 12th Century&#8217; line one of Tony Blair&#8217;s &#8216;he wants to destroy our civilisation&#8217; lies? </p>
<p>I was under the impression that Bin Laden wanted the USA and friends to stop interferring in the Middle East? America and Britain are under attack because of the treatment of the Palestinian Arabs, unquestioning support for Israel and our lies over the past 100 years. And now due to our destruction of Iraq, which was based on another lie. Do you see a pattern here? </p>
<p>If you keep on poking a hornets&#8217; nest, don&#8217;t be surprised when they eventually fly out and sting you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan Russow</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/25/davos07-terrorism/#comment-305911</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan Russow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2433#comment-305911</guid>
		<description>World Economic Forum: Comprehensive Response to terrorism (state terrorism and corporate destabilization of states) 

At the World Economic Forum, Michael Chertoff, US Secretary of Homeland Security stated â€œWe need to impose consequences on those countries that will not sign anti-terror agreements,â€  He also called for a Comprehensive Response to Terrorism. 
If there is to be a Comprehensive Response to Terrorism, the States and Corporations attending the World Economic Forum, must at address their contribution to Global insecurity, and at a minimum endorse the following 
The Comprehensive Response to Terrorism including state terrorism and corporate destabilization of states:

We recognize that  true security- is not  &quot;collective security&quot; or
&quot;human security&quot; which has been extended to &quot;humanitarian
intervention&quot; and used along with the &quot;responsibility to protect&quot;
notion to justify increased military budgets and military intervention in other states.

True security is common security (extension of Olaf Palme&#039;s notion of
&quot;common security&quot;)

and involves the following objectives:

*  to promote and fully guarantee respect for human rights including
labour rights,  civil and political rights, social and cultural
rights- right to food, right to housing, right to universally
accessible not for profit health care system , right to education and
social justice;
*  to enable socially equitable and environmentally sound employment,
and ensure the right to development [as per Convention];
*  to achieve a state of peace, social justice and disarmament;
through reallocation of military expenses, and eradication of poverty
*  to create a global structure that respects the rule of law ; and
*  to ensure the preservation and protection of the environment,
respect the inherent worth of nature beyond human purpose, reduce the
ecological footprint and move away from the current model of
overconsumptive development.

We acknowledge that  for years, through conventions, treaties and
covenants, through Conference Action plans, and through UN General
Assembly resolutions, member states of the United Nations have
incurred obligations, made commitments and created expectations
related to the furtherance of Common Security.

We affirm that  Common security can only be achieved if there is a
concerted international effort to eliminate the complexity and
interdependence of the actions that have led to global insecurity

WE THE X COUNTRIES and CORPORATIONS HAVE AGREED TO THE FOLLOWING:

Article  1
We reaffirm our commitment to multilateralism and oppose unilateral
actions that undermine global common security.

Article 2
We undertake to reduce our military budgets  and reallocate military
expenses and transfer the savings into global social justice  as
undertaken through numerous UN Conference Action Plans and UN General
Assembly Resolutions.

Article 3
We will no longer undermine the notion of democracy by couching a
plutocracy/theocracy  in democratic notions of &quot;freedom&quot;.

Article 4
We will abandon  the  policy of pre-emptive/preventive attack to
aggressively attack sovereign states  which has been a violation of
the UN Charter article 2 and international law and is the
&#039;supreme&#039; international crime of a war of aggression.

Article 5
We will no longer perceive justice in terms of revenge through
military intervention we will instead seek justice through the
International Court of Justice.

Article 6
We will no longer misconstrue Art 51 (self defence)  of the Charter
of the United Nations to justify premeditated non provoked military
aggression.

Article 7
We will oppose any attempt  to undermine the international resolve to
prevent the scourge of war; this would include not engaging in
intimidation or in offering economic incentives in exchange for
support for military intervention.

Article 8
We undertake to respect the mandatory jurisdiction of
the International Court of Justice ,and will abide by its decisions.

Article 9
We will convert to peaceful purposes military bases in sovereign
states around the world, and end the circulation of  nuclear powered
or nuclear arms capable vessels  throughout the world.

Article 10
We will discontinue propping up and financing  military dictators.

Article 11
We will abandon the practice of  targeting or  assisting  in the
assassination of leaders of other sovereign states, and engaging in 
covert destabilization or democratically elected leaders of or any 
leader of a sovereign state.

Article 12
We will abide by the Nuclear Non Proliferation treaty and immediately
implement Article VI of the treaty, (Article VI: commits all parties
to pursue negotiations in good faith on measures to end the nuclear
arms race and to achieve disarmament.)  and we will end the
production of all  weapons of  mass destruction such as nuclear,
chemical, and biological,  as agreed to in UNCHE in 1972, and in
specific conventions.

Article 13
We reaffirm the obligations under the 1967 the Outer space Treaty to
ensure that exploration and use of outer space, including the moon
and other celestial bodies, shall be carried out for the benefit and
in the interests of all countries, irrespective of their degree of
economic or scientific development, and shall be the province of all
mankind humanity.

Article 14
We make a full commitment to disarmament and oppose the continued
profit making from the sale of arms,  will implement obligations to
reduce the trade in small arms  and in collaboration with the ILO
will fund a fair and just transition program for worker currently
working in the arms trade.

Article 15
We will end the production of land mines and sign and ratify the
Convention for the Banning of Landmines, and  affirm a commitment of 
funds and continuous effort to remove land mines from all areas of 
the world where they are known to exist.

Article 16
We will suffocate the production of uranium, phase out the use of
civil nuclear energy, and prohibit the  use of weapons such as
Depleted Uranium and cluster bombs that would be prohibited under the
Geneva Protocol II.

Article 17
We oppose  NATO&#039;S first strike policy,  and support the disbanding of NATO.

Article 18
We will abide by the Geneva conventions on the treatment of
civilians, and respect international human rights and humanitarian law.

Article 19
We will discharge  obligations  incurred through conventions,
treaties, and covenants; and act on commitments through conference
action plans related to Common security - peace, environment, human
rights and social justice

Article 20
    We will sign, ratify, and enact the necessary legislation to ensure
compliance with, or respect  for Common Security international
Conventions, Covenants and Treaties.

Article 21
We will abide by the Convention against Torture through Cruel,
Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and end the practice
of rendition of citizens and will abide by the Geneva conventions.

Article 22
We will eliminate cruel and inhumane punishment such as capital
punishment, which violates accepted international norms.

Article 23
We will abandon institutions and agreements which  promulgate
globalization, deregulation and privatization; these institutions and
agreements undermine the rule of international public trust law, and
condone  and actively facilitate corporations benefiting and
profiting from war.

Article 24
we oppose the  promulgation,  globalization, deregulation and
privatization through trade agreements, such as the WTO/FTAA/NAFTA
etc that undermine the rule of international public trust law.

Article 25
We abandon  the IMF structural adjustment program which has led to
the violation of human rights,  has exploited citizens in the
developing world and has adversely  impacted on vulnerable and indigenous
peoples around the world.

Article 26
We oppose the privatization of public services such as water and
health care, we will increase funding to Universities to counter
the corporate funding of education including the corporate direction
of research and declare that these be the responsibility of governments.

Article 27
We will finally implement the long standing international commitment
to transfer .7% of the GDP for overseas aid, and to cancel  third
world deb.

Article 28
We will no longer subsidize and invest in companies that have
developed weapons of mass destruction, that have violated human
rights, that have denied social justice, that have exploited workers,
and that have destroyed the environment.

Article 29
we will implement the commitment made  to ensure that corporations,
including transnational corporations comply .. with international 
law, and that they pay compensation for any previous health and 
environmental consequences of their actions.

Article 30
We will revoke charters and licences of corporations that have
violated human rights, including labour rights, that have contributed
to war and violence, and that have led to the destruction of the
environment.

Article 31
We support Mandatory International Ethical Normative (MIEN) standards
and enforceable regulations to drive industry to conform to
international law, and oppose corporate &quot;voluntary compliance&quot;.

Article 32
We will ban practices that contribute to environmentally induced
diseases and we will address poverty related health problems and
ensure universal access, to publicly funded not for profit health
care system.

Article 33
We will end the production of toxic, hazardous, atomic waste, and  we
will  prevent the transfer to other states of substances and
activities that are harmful to human health or the environment as
agreed at the UN Conferences on the Environment and Development, 1992.

Article 34
We will ban the production, approval and promotion of
genetically engineered foods and crops which have  led to a deterioration of
the food supply, and to loss of heritage seeds.

Article 35
We will protect Biodiversity by signing and ratifying   the
Convention on Biological Diversity and oppose &quot;megadiversity&quot;
--resulting from genetic engineering.

Article 36
We will be forthright in acknowledging that the Biosafety Protocol is
a disguised trade agreement, and serves to promote the acceptance of
Genetically modified living organisms.

Article 37
We will accept the warnings of the Intergovernmental panel on Climate
change, and no longer disregard obligations under the Framework
Convention on Climate Change and its protocol to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions, and to preserve carbon sinks.. We will oppose any
suggestion that civil nuclear energy is the solution to climate change.

Article 38
We will rescind anti-terrorism legislation because it violates civil
and political rights, and results in racial profiling.

Article 39
We will no longer target, intimidate and discriminate against
activists on the grounds of political and other opinion  (a listed
ground in the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights}

Article 40
We will clearly distinguish legitimate dissent from criminal acts of
subversion.

Article 41
We will end all  discrimination  on the  following grounds:
- race, tribe, or culture;
- colour, ethnicity, national ethnic or social origin, or language;
nationality, place of birth, or nature of residence (refugee or
immigrant, migrant worker);
- gender, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, or form
of family, [including same-sex marriage]
- disability or age;
- religion or conviction, political or other opinion, or - class, economic
position, or other status.

Article 42
We will end the discrimination against immigrants, and refugees and
we sign and ratify the Convention for the Protection of Migrant
Workers and their Families; and the Convention on Refugees.

Article 43
We will respect women&#039;s reproductive rights, and abide by commitments
made under the International Conference on Population and
Development, and the Beijing Platform.

Article 44
We oppose religious extremism and proselytizing including the spread of
Evangelical Christianity around the world, which has undermined local
indigenous cultures, instilled fear through the dangerous, belief in
the &quot;rapture&quot;, &quot;Armageddon&quot; and &quot;left behind&quot;, has promulgated
dispensationalist &quot;end times&quot; scenario which has serious irreversible
consequences. and has led to the denigrating other established
beliefs and practices.

Article 45
We support the institution of an International Court of Compliance
linked to the International Court of Justice; The Court of Compliance
will hear evidence from citizens of state non compliance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>World Economic Forum: Comprehensive Response to terrorism (state terrorism and corporate destabilization of states) </p>
<p>At the World Economic Forum, Michael Chertoff, US Secretary of Homeland Security stated â€œWe need to impose consequences on those countries that will not sign anti-terror agreements,â€  He also called for a Comprehensive Response to Terrorism.<br />
If there is to be a Comprehensive Response to Terrorism, the States and Corporations attending the World Economic Forum, must at address their contribution to Global insecurity, and at a minimum endorse the following<br />
The Comprehensive Response to Terrorism including state terrorism and corporate destabilization of states:</p>
<p>We recognize that  true security- is not  &#8220;collective security&#8221; or<br />
&#8220;human security&#8221; which has been extended to &#8220;humanitarian<br />
intervention&#8221; and used along with the &#8220;responsibility to protect&#8221;<br />
notion to justify increased military budgets and military intervention in other states.</p>
<p>True security is common security (extension of Olaf Palme&#8217;s notion of<br />
&#8220;common security&#8221;)</p>
<p>and involves the following objectives:</p>
<p>*  to promote and fully guarantee respect for human rights including<br />
labour rights,  civil and political rights, social and cultural<br />
rights- right to food, right to housing, right to universally<br />
accessible not for profit health care system , right to education and<br />
social justice;<br />
*  to enable socially equitable and environmentally sound employment,<br />
and ensure the right to development [as per Convention];<br />
*  to achieve a state of peace, social justice and disarmament;<br />
through reallocation of military expenses, and eradication of poverty<br />
*  to create a global structure that respects the rule of law ; and<br />
*  to ensure the preservation and protection of the environment,<br />
respect the inherent worth of nature beyond human purpose, reduce the<br />
ecological footprint and move away from the current model of<br />
overconsumptive development.</p>
<p>We acknowledge that  for years, through conventions, treaties and<br />
covenants, through Conference Action plans, and through UN General<br />
Assembly resolutions, member states of the United Nations have<br />
incurred obligations, made commitments and created expectations<br />
related to the furtherance of Common Security.</p>
<p>We affirm that  Common security can only be achieved if there is a<br />
concerted international effort to eliminate the complexity and<br />
interdependence of the actions that have led to global insecurity</p>
<p>WE THE X COUNTRIES and CORPORATIONS HAVE AGREED TO THE FOLLOWING:</p>
<p>Article  1<br />
We reaffirm our commitment to multilateralism and oppose unilateral<br />
actions that undermine global common security.</p>
<p>Article 2<br />
We undertake to reduce our military budgets  and reallocate military<br />
expenses and transfer the savings into global social justice  as<br />
undertaken through numerous UN Conference Action Plans and UN General<br />
Assembly Resolutions.</p>
<p>Article 3<br />
We will no longer undermine the notion of democracy by couching a<br />
plutocracy/theocracy  in democratic notions of &#8220;freedom&#8221;.</p>
<p>Article 4<br />
We will abandon  the  policy of pre-emptive/preventive attack to<br />
aggressively attack sovereign states  which has been a violation of<br />
the UN Charter article 2 and international law and is the<br />
&#8217;supreme&#8217; international crime of a war of aggression.</p>
<p>Article 5<br />
We will no longer perceive justice in terms of revenge through<br />
military intervention we will instead seek justice through the<br />
International Court of Justice.</p>
<p>Article 6<br />
We will no longer misconstrue Art 51 (self defence)  of the Charter<br />
of the United Nations to justify premeditated non provoked military<br />
aggression.</p>
<p>Article 7<br />
We will oppose any attempt  to undermine the international resolve to<br />
prevent the scourge of war; this would include not engaging in<br />
intimidation or in offering economic incentives in exchange for<br />
support for military intervention.</p>
<p>Article 8<br />
We undertake to respect the mandatory jurisdiction of<br />
the International Court of Justice ,and will abide by its decisions.</p>
<p>Article 9<br />
We will convert to peaceful purposes military bases in sovereign<br />
states around the world, and end the circulation of  nuclear powered<br />
or nuclear arms capable vessels  throughout the world.</p>
<p>Article 10<br />
We will discontinue propping up and financing  military dictators.</p>
<p>Article 11<br />
We will abandon the practice of  targeting or  assisting  in the<br />
assassination of leaders of other sovereign states, and engaging in<br />
covert destabilization or democratically elected leaders of or any<br />
leader of a sovereign state.</p>
<p>Article 12<br />
We will abide by the Nuclear Non Proliferation treaty and immediately<br />
implement Article VI of the treaty, (Article VI: commits all parties<br />
to pursue negotiations in good faith on measures to end the nuclear<br />
arms race and to achieve disarmament.)  and we will end the<br />
production of all  weapons of  mass destruction such as nuclear,<br />
chemical, and biological,  as agreed to in UNCHE in 1972, and in<br />
specific conventions.</p>
<p>Article 13<br />
We reaffirm the obligations under the 1967 the Outer space Treaty to<br />
ensure that exploration and use of outer space, including the moon<br />
and other celestial bodies, shall be carried out for the benefit and<br />
in the interests of all countries, irrespective of their degree of<br />
economic or scientific development, and shall be the province of all<br />
mankind humanity.</p>
<p>Article 14<br />
We make a full commitment to disarmament and oppose the continued<br />
profit making from the sale of arms,  will implement obligations to<br />
reduce the trade in small arms  and in collaboration with the ILO<br />
will fund a fair and just transition program for worker currently<br />
working in the arms trade.</p>
<p>Article 15<br />
We will end the production of land mines and sign and ratify the<br />
Convention for the Banning of Landmines, and  affirm a commitment of<br />
funds and continuous effort to remove land mines from all areas of<br />
the world where they are known to exist.</p>
<p>Article 16<br />
We will suffocate the production of uranium, phase out the use of<br />
civil nuclear energy, and prohibit the  use of weapons such as<br />
Depleted Uranium and cluster bombs that would be prohibited under the<br />
Geneva Protocol II.</p>
<p>Article 17<br />
We oppose  NATO&#8217;S first strike policy,  and support the disbanding of NATO.</p>
<p>Article 18<br />
We will abide by the Geneva conventions on the treatment of<br />
civilians, and respect international human rights and humanitarian law.</p>
<p>Article 19<br />
We will discharge  obligations  incurred through conventions,<br />
treaties, and covenants; and act on commitments through conference<br />
action plans related to Common security &#8211; peace, environment, human<br />
rights and social justice</p>
<p>Article 20<br />
    We will sign, ratify, and enact the necessary legislation to ensure<br />
compliance with, or respect  for Common Security international<br />
Conventions, Covenants and Treaties.</p>
<p>Article 21<br />
We will abide by the Convention against Torture through Cruel,<br />
Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and end the practice<br />
of rendition of citizens and will abide by the Geneva conventions.</p>
<p>Article 22<br />
We will eliminate cruel and inhumane punishment such as capital<br />
punishment, which violates accepted international norms.</p>
<p>Article 23<br />
We will abandon institutions and agreements which  promulgate<br />
globalization, deregulation and privatization; these institutions and<br />
agreements undermine the rule of international public trust law, and<br />
condone  and actively facilitate corporations benefiting and<br />
profiting from war.</p>
<p>Article 24<br />
we oppose the  promulgation,  globalization, deregulation and<br />
privatization through trade agreements, such as the WTO/FTAA/NAFTA<br />
etc that undermine the rule of international public trust law.</p>
<p>Article 25<br />
We abandon  the IMF structural adjustment program which has led to<br />
the violation of human rights,  has exploited citizens in the<br />
developing world and has adversely  impacted on vulnerable and indigenous<br />
peoples around the world.</p>
<p>Article 26<br />
We oppose the privatization of public services such as water and<br />
health care, we will increase funding to Universities to counter<br />
the corporate funding of education including the corporate direction<br />
of research and declare that these be the responsibility of governments.</p>
<p>Article 27<br />
We will finally implement the long standing international commitment<br />
to transfer .7% of the GDP for overseas aid, and to cancel  third<br />
world deb.</p>
<p>Article 28<br />
We will no longer subsidize and invest in companies that have<br />
developed weapons of mass destruction, that have violated human<br />
rights, that have denied social justice, that have exploited workers,<br />
and that have destroyed the environment.</p>
<p>Article 29<br />
we will implement the commitment made  to ensure that corporations,<br />
including transnational corporations comply .. with international<br />
law, and that they pay compensation for any previous health and<br />
environmental consequences of their actions.</p>
<p>Article 30<br />
We will revoke charters and licences of corporations that have<br />
violated human rights, including labour rights, that have contributed<br />
to war and violence, and that have led to the destruction of the<br />
environment.</p>
<p>Article 31<br />
We support Mandatory International Ethical Normative (MIEN) standards<br />
and enforceable regulations to drive industry to conform to<br />
international law, and oppose corporate &#8220;voluntary compliance&#8221;.</p>
<p>Article 32<br />
We will ban practices that contribute to environmentally induced<br />
diseases and we will address poverty related health problems and<br />
ensure universal access, to publicly funded not for profit health<br />
care system.</p>
<p>Article 33<br />
We will end the production of toxic, hazardous, atomic waste, and  we<br />
will  prevent the transfer to other states of substances and<br />
activities that are harmful to human health or the environment as<br />
agreed at the UN Conferences on the Environment and Development, 1992.</p>
<p>Article 34<br />
We will ban the production, approval and promotion of<br />
genetically engineered foods and crops which have  led to a deterioration of<br />
the food supply, and to loss of heritage seeds.</p>
<p>Article 35<br />
We will protect Biodiversity by signing and ratifying   the<br />
Convention on Biological Diversity and oppose &#8220;megadiversity&#8221;<br />
&#8211;resulting from genetic engineering.</p>
<p>Article 36<br />
We will be forthright in acknowledging that the Biosafety Protocol is<br />
a disguised trade agreement, and serves to promote the acceptance of<br />
Genetically modified living organisms.</p>
<p>Article 37<br />
We will accept the warnings of the Intergovernmental panel on Climate<br />
change, and no longer disregard obligations under the Framework<br />
Convention on Climate Change and its protocol to reduce greenhouse<br />
gas emissions, and to preserve carbon sinks.. We will oppose any<br />
suggestion that civil nuclear energy is the solution to climate change.</p>
<p>Article 38<br />
We will rescind anti-terrorism legislation because it violates civil<br />
and political rights, and results in racial profiling.</p>
<p>Article 39<br />
We will no longer target, intimidate and discriminate against<br />
activists on the grounds of political and other opinion  (a listed<br />
ground in the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights}</p>
<p>Article 40<br />
We will clearly distinguish legitimate dissent from criminal acts of<br />
subversion.</p>
<p>Article 41<br />
We will end all  discrimination  on the  following grounds:<br />
- race, tribe, or culture;<br />
- colour, ethnicity, national ethnic or social origin, or language;<br />
nationality, place of birth, or nature of residence (refugee or<br />
immigrant, migrant worker);<br />
- gender, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, or form<br />
of family, [including same-sex marriage]<br />
- disability or age;<br />
- religion or conviction, political or other opinion, or &#8211; class, economic<br />
position, or other status.</p>
<p>Article 42<br />
We will end the discrimination against immigrants, and refugees and<br />
we sign and ratify the Convention for the Protection of Migrant<br />
Workers and their Families; and the Convention on Refugees.</p>
<p>Article 43<br />
We will respect women&#8217;s reproductive rights, and abide by commitments<br />
made under the International Conference on Population and<br />
Development, and the Beijing Platform.</p>
<p>Article 44<br />
We oppose religious extremism and proselytizing including the spread of<br />
Evangelical Christianity around the world, which has undermined local<br />
indigenous cultures, instilled fear through the dangerous, belief in<br />
the &#8220;rapture&#8221;, &#8220;Armageddon&#8221; and &#8220;left behind&#8221;, has promulgated<br />
dispensationalist &#8220;end times&#8221; scenario which has serious irreversible<br />
consequences. and has led to the denigrating other established<br />
beliefs and practices.</p>
<p>Article 45<br />
We support the institution of an International Court of Compliance<br />
linked to the International Court of Justice; The Court of Compliance<br />
will hear evidence from citizens of state non compliance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Hunkins &#124; Joe Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/25/davos07-terrorism/#comment-305770</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Hunkins &#124; Joe Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2433#comment-305770</guid>
		<description>Liveblogging Davos!   Jeff, you are a credit to techies and journalists the world around.  Thanks for the insider view!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liveblogging Davos!   Jeff, you are a credit to techies and journalists the world around.  Thanks for the insider view!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pakistan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; * * * * *</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/25/davos07-terrorism/#comment-305488</link>
		<dc:creator>Pakistan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; * * * * *</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2433#comment-305488</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8211; more &#8211; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; more &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

