<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Davos07: Conversation post mortem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/01/davos07-conversation-post-mortem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/01/davos07-conversation-post-mortem/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lucy Hooberman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/01/davos07-conversation-post-mortem/#comment-314854</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy Hooberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2465#comment-314854</guid>
		<description>Jeff- do you know how many videos were submitted?  Of those, how many were questions that were put to Davos speakers or organisers?  And were all the answers published?  I followed the Davos Conversation, which I thought was a step-change in blogging production at a conference, and a good one - but keen to think about how to measure the Q&#38;A and engagement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff- do you know how many videos were submitted?  Of those, how many were questions that were put to Davos speakers or organisers?  And were all the answers published?  I followed the Davos Conversation, which I thought was a step-change in blogging production at a conference, and a good one - but keen to think about how to measure the Q&amp;A and engagement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
