<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Networked journalism in The Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/08/networked-journalism-in-the-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/08/networked-journalism-in-the-times/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Framtider.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-02-11</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/08/networked-journalism-in-the-times/#comment-326677</link>
		<dc:creator>Framtider.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-02-11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/02/08/networked-journalism-in-the-times/#comment-326677</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine: Networked journalism in The Times Journalistiken blir bÃ¤ttre nÃ¤r lÃ¤sarna slÃ¤pps in. (tags: journalistik deltagande_journalistik buzzmachine jeff_jarvis david_pogue newyorktimes) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine: Networked journalism in The Times Journalistiken blir bÃ¤ttre nÃ¤r lÃ¤sarna slÃ¤pps in. (tags: journalistik deltagande_journalistik buzzmachine jeff_jarvis david_pogue newyorktimes) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david pogue</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/08/networked-journalism-in-the-times/#comment-325699</link>
		<dc:creator>david pogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 22:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/02/08/networked-journalism-in-the-times/#comment-325699</guid>
		<description>&quot;But Jeff, according to his blog, David uses a Nikon D80 (as I do), a 10.2 megapixel camera. Why doesnâ€™t he practice what he pundits?&quot;

As Shawn noted above, the D80 is a review unit from Nikon.

Me, I think I&#039;m gonna go for the 6-megapixel D40 when I have to buy one.

--Pogue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But Jeff, according to his blog, David uses a Nikon D80 (as I do), a 10.2 megapixel camera. Why doesnâ€™t he practice what he pundits?&#8221;</p>
<p>As Shawn noted above, the D80 is a review unit from Nikon.</p>
<p>Me, I think I&#8217;m gonna go for the 6-megapixel D40 when I have to buy one.</p>
<p>&#8211;Pogue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn King</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/08/networked-journalism-in-the-times/#comment-324839</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 03:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/02/08/networked-journalism-in-the-times/#comment-324839</guid>
		<description>&quot;David uses a Nikon D80...&quot;

It&#039;s a loaner from Nikon, not his personal camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;David uses a Nikon D80&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a loaner from Nikon, not his personal camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Mumblings</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/08/networked-journalism-in-the-times/#comment-323763</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Mumblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 03:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/02/08/networked-journalism-in-the-times/#comment-323763</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;After the fire, everything&#039;s changed&lt;/strong&gt;

 Michael Patrick / News Sentinel staff The early bloggers, people like Jeff Jarvis and Glenn Reynolds, point to 9/11 as the seminal event that forever changed their blogs and blogging as a way of writing about and interpreting news....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>After the fire, everything&#8217;s changed</strong></p>
<p> Michael Patrick / News Sentinel staff The early bloggers, people like Jeff Jarvis and Glenn Reynolds, point to 9/11 as the seminal event that forever changed their blogs and blogging as a way of writing about and interpreting news&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill K.</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/08/networked-journalism-in-the-times/#comment-323762</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 03:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/02/08/networked-journalism-in-the-times/#comment-323762</guid>
		<description>Hey Jeff:

In his Times articles Pogue says, &quot;The actual lesson, then, is this: &#039;For the nonprofessional, five or six megapixels is plenty, even if you intend to make poster-size prints.&#039;&quot;

But Jeff, according to his blog, David uses a Nikon D80 (as I do), a 10.2 megapixel camera. Why doesnâ€™t he practice what he pundits?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jeff:</p>
<p>In his Times articles Pogue says, &#8220;The actual lesson, then, is this: &#8216;For the nonprofessional, five or six megapixels is plenty, even if you intend to make poster-size prints.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>But Jeff, according to his blog, David uses a Nikon D80 (as I do), a 10.2 megapixel camera. Why doesnâ€™t he practice what he pundits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

