<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New rule: Cover what you do best. Link to the rest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 11:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paradigm Shift: News is Community &#171; Just Another Meme Vector</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-378229</link>
		<dc:creator>Paradigm Shift: News is Community &#171; Just Another Meme Vector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-378229</guid>
		<description>[...] goes back to Jeff Jarvis&#8217; maxim: do what you do best, link to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] goes back to Jeff Jarvis&#8217; maxim: do what you do best, link to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New Architecture Of News &#171; Andrew McMillen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-376848</link>
		<dc:creator>The New Architecture Of News &#171; Andrew McMillen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 11:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-376848</guid>
		<description>[...] discussing online news, Jarvis says it best: Cover what you do best. Link to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussing online news, Jarvis says it best: Cover what you do best. Link to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where are all the IT bloggers? &#124; Media Money</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-376791</link>
		<dc:creator>Where are all the IT bloggers? &#124; Media Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-376791</guid>
		<description>[...] for running the awards should go to the editors of a trade paper that practices Jeff Jarvis&#8217;s maxim: &#8220;Cover what you do best and link to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for running the awards should go to the editors of a trade paper that practices Jeff Jarvis&#8217;s maxim: &#8220;Cover what you do best and link to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outside.in &#187; Hyperlocal in the News</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-376640</link>
		<dc:creator>outside.in &#187; Hyperlocal in the News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-376640</guid>
		<description>[...] they can shift resources towards the more scalable model of aggregating and adding value on top. Jeff Jarvis says &#8220;Cover what you do best. Link to the rest.&#8221; We agree. Interested in hearing your comments on this story and the ongoing debate of hyperlocal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they can shift resources towards the more scalable model of aggregating and adding value on top. Jeff Jarvis says &#8220;Cover what you do best. Link to the rest.&#8221; We agree. Interested in hearing your comments on this story and the ongoing debate of hyperlocal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The ethic of the link layer on news</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-376396</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The ethic of the link layer on news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-376396</guid>
		<description>[...] This ethic of the link will become all the more important as news organizations pare down to their essence. I&#8217;ve said often that they will have to do what they do best and link to the rest. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This ethic of the link will become all the more important as news organizations pare down to their essence. I&#8217;ve said often that they will have to do what they do best and link to the rest. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New Architecture of News &#171; Upendra Shardanand</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-375976</link>
		<dc:creator>The New Architecture of News &#171; Upendra Shardanand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 02:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-375976</guid>
		<description>[...] When we first started Daylife, we were unsure whether traditional news companies would be receptive to the notion of linking to their competitors and the wider web. After all, this was an industry which not too long ago was worried about deep linking. But news companies are rapidly realizing that to best serve their readers’ news needs, publishers can&#8217;t rely just on their own original content. They have to show their readers what&#8217;s out there on the web. Or, as Jeff Jarvis says, do what you do best and link to the rest.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When we first started Daylife, we were unsure whether traditional news companies would be receptive to the notion of linking to their competitors and the wider web. After all, this was an industry which not too long ago was worried about deep linking. But news companies are rapidly realizing that to best serve their readers’ news needs, publishers can&#8217;t rely just on their own original content. They have to show their readers what&#8217;s out there on the web. Or, as Jeff Jarvis says, do what you do best and link to the rest.&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A System of Loyalties and Protections &#171; Co-render.com</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-375335</link>
		<dc:creator>A System of Loyalties and Protections &#171; Co-render.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-375335</guid>
		<description>[...] we should curate more as we create less. That’s another way to say what I’ve said other ways: Do what we do best and link to the rest. Also: We need to gather more and produce less, so we also need to encourage others to produce more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we should curate more as we create less. That’s another way to say what I’ve said other ways: Do what we do best and link to the rest. Also: We need to gather more and produce less, so we also need to encourage others to produce more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Reverse syndication</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-369147</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Reverse syndication</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-369147</guid>
		<description>[...] which is also engaging in layoffs, can&#8217;t afford to do everything anymore and so it has to do what it does best and link to the rest. Granted that the ad revenue on a Baghdad story won&#8217;t be great but added traffic would add [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which is also engaging in layoffs, can&#8217;t afford to do everything anymore and so it has to do what it does best and link to the rest. Granted that the ad revenue on a Baghdad story won&#8217;t be great but added traffic would add [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Glam: The success of the network</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-369034</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Glam: The success of the network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-369034</guid>
		<description>[...] curate more as we create less. That&#8217;s another way to say what I&#8217;ve said other ways: Do what we do best and link to the rest. Also: We need to gather more and produce less, so we also need to encourage others to produce more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] curate more as we create less. That&#8217;s another way to say what I&#8217;ve said other ways: Do what we do best and link to the rest. Also: We need to gather more and produce less, so we also need to encourage others to produce more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What can I cover best? &#171; my Voice is in here somewhere&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-366176</link>
		<dc:creator>What can I cover best? &#171; my Voice is in here somewhere&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-366176</guid>
		<description>[...] Within the post he links to an earlier post which really struck a cord with me. Jeff asserts that a key principle of blogging is to &#8220;Cover what you do best, and link to the rest.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Within the post he links to an earlier post which really struck a cord with me. Jeff asserts that a key principle of blogging is to &#8220;Cover what you do best, and link to the rest.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Halfway &#8217;round the track</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-366172</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Halfway &#8217;round the track</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-366172</guid>
		<description>[...] too (the Glam model). Then I&#8217;d still have the benefit of his best-of-breed coverage &#8212; doing what I did best while linking to the rest &#8212; with less expense &#8212; none, really, because I&#8217;m just sharing revenue for sold [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] too (the Glam model). Then I&#8217;d still have the benefit of his best-of-breed coverage &#8212; doing what I did best while linking to the rest &#8212; with less expense &#8212; none, really, because I&#8217;m just sharing revenue for sold [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Novos links adicionados &#171; Innovation Economics</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-363230</link>
		<dc:creator>Novos links adicionados &#171; Innovation Economics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-363230</guid>
		<description>[...] New Rule: Cover what you do better, link to the rest! &#8211;&#62; Sobre uma tendÃªncia identificada pelo autor na qual seria mais produtivo se os agentes de mÃ­dia fizessem somente o que Ã© de sua mÃ¡xima expertise e linkassem o resto (e aÃ­ teriam tambÃ©m que ser bons para linkar com a coisa certa!) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Rule: Cover what you do better, link to the rest! &#8211;&gt; Sobre uma tendÃªncia identificada pelo autor na qual seria mais produtivo se os agentes de mÃ­dia fizessem somente o que Ã© de sua mÃ¡xima expertise e linkassem o resto (e aÃ­ teriam tambÃ©m que ser bons para linkar com a coisa certa!) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: softexpose.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is local news doomed? Naw.</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-358546</link>
		<dc:creator>softexpose.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is local news doomed? Naw.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 01:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-358546</guid>
		<description>[...] * Report, damnit, report. The most important thing we can do is, of course, bring journalism to the community: report. We need to become known as the indispensable sources of local help and information and Iâ€™d argue â€” contrary to the Shorenstein report â€” that this comes not from trying to compete with the big guys in national, commodity news but by putting all our resources behind what we do best and what no one else â€” including, ferchrissakes, local TV â€” can afford to do: report. We have to make our value absolutely clear and we need to increase that value even as our resources are diminished. How? Do what you do best and link to the rest.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] * Report, damnit, report. The most important thing we can do is, of course, bring journalism to the community: report. We need to become known as the indispensable sources of local help and information and Iâ€™d argue â€” contrary to the Shorenstein report â€” that this comes not from trying to compete with the big guys in national, commodity news but by putting all our resources behind what we do best and what no one else â€” including, ferchrissakes, local TV â€” can afford to do: report. We have to make our value absolutely clear and we need to increase that value even as our resources are diminished. How? Do what you do best and link to the rest.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Networked journalism: Pro-pro</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-355364</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Networked journalism: Pro-pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-355364</guid>
		<description>[...] You can&#8217;t do it all yourself. The story gets better when the story can get bigger. Do what you do best and link to the rest. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can&#8217;t do it all yourself. The story gets better when the story can get bigger. Do what you do best and link to the rest. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digikko</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-343859</link>
		<dc:creator>Digikko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-343859</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Keskity siihen minkÃ¤ osaat - ja linkitÃ¤ loput...&lt;/strong&gt;

Olen viime aikoina ihmetellyt pitkÃ¤n linjan journalistien marmatusta siitÃ¤ kammottavasta tosiasiasta, ettÃ¤ heidÃ¤n on tÃ¤ytynyt raahautua Susan Kurosen kirjan julkistustilaisuuteen. MistÃ¤ moinen kÃ¤ytÃ¶s johtuu? Oma arvaukseni on, ettÃ¤ journalisti...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Keskity siihen minkÃ¤ osaat - ja linkitÃ¤ loput&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Olen viime aikoina ihmetellyt pitkÃ¤n linjan journalistien marmatusta siitÃ¤ kammottavasta tosiasiasta, ettÃ¤ heidÃ¤n on tÃ¤ytynyt raahautua Susan Kurosen kirjan julkistustilaisuuteen. MistÃ¤ moinen kÃ¤ytÃ¶s johtuu? Oma arvaukseni on, ettÃ¤ journalisti&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Was/Is/Will be</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-343857</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Was/Is/Will be</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-343857</guid>
		<description>[...] way it is: Newspapers try to cover all the news themselves. The way it will be: â€œCover what you do best. Link to the rest.â€ â€” Jeff Jarvis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] way it is: Newspapers try to cover all the news themselves. The way it will be: â€œCover what you do best. Link to the rest.â€ â€” Jeff Jarvis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The platform paradox</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-343855</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The platform paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-343855</guid>
		<description>[...] I noodle around with the notion of a new architecture of news, I wonder whether news organizations start to look more like platforms and less like closed content [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I noodle around with the notion of a new architecture of news, I wonder whether news organizations start to look more like platforms and less like closed content [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmmtc</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-343852</link>
		<dc:creator>jmmtc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-343852</guid>
		<description>... and when you can't do anything at all... just link to it! like the daily free newspapers that you get everyday delivered to your hand on subways and trains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and when you can&#8217;t do anything at all&#8230; just link to it! like the daily free newspapers that you get everyday delivered to your hand on subways and trains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Age of the Link, Helps Us Focus on Our Best &#171; Movin&#8217; Ahead</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-343836</link>
		<dc:creator>Age of the Link, Helps Us Focus on Our Best &#171; Movin&#8217; Ahead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-343836</guid>
		<description>[...] in Tom Foremski&#8217;s NewRulesCommunications.Â  Tom references BuzzMachine.com&#8217;s story New rule: Cover what you do best. Link to the restÂ about how local papers might do better by coveringÂ their communityÂ and taking wire/Internet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Tom Foremski&#8217;s NewRulesCommunications.Â  Tom references BuzzMachine.com&#8217;s story New rule: Cover what you do best. Link to the restÂ about how local papers might do better by coveringÂ their communityÂ and taking wire/Internet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newscoma</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-343674</link>
		<dc:creator>newscoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-343674</guid>
		<description>Very good advice. As I work in news, I am currently transferring our internet site to a new direction, the advice was quite helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good advice. As I work in news, I am currently transferring our internet site to a new direction, the advice was quite helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cubre sÃ³lo lo que hagas bien y enlaza el resto &#187; eCuaderno</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-343639</link>
		<dc:creator>Cubre sÃ³lo lo que hagas bien y enlaza el resto &#187; eCuaderno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 09:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-343639</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis propone como nueva regla para los cibermedios concentrarse en la cobertura de aquellos temas para los que cada medio estÃ¡ mejor preparado y enlazar el resto: New rule: Cover what you do best. Link to the rest. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis propone como nueva regla para los cibermedios concentrarse en la cobertura de aquellos temas para los que cada medio estÃ¡ mejor preparado y enlazar el resto: New rule: Cover what you do best. Link to the rest. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-343511</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-343511</guid>
		<description>Jeff;
I think you are reading way too much into how a general daily paper like the Times decides what to cover. The Anna Nicole Smith story meets the first criterion of any news source that is serving what is, by definition, a general readership: it's bloody interesting. Why should we media workers - be you an old-school reporter, blogger, editor, photographer - try to impose some technocratic limitations on that cardinal rule between journalist and news consumer...If it's interesting and worth analyzing, then cover it.
I've worked in every old-school medium going - in the UK and now here in the US - and I remember well the days when BBC senior news managers threatened to start establishing corporation-wide rules for what was "worth" throwing reporter-power at. Ultimately, you have to allow individual programmes, or sites, or papers, who aim at a GENERAL audience, to edit their own product. Falling into some trendy zeitgeist would be a disaster for reporting everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff;<br />
I think you are reading way too much into how a general daily paper like the Times decides what to cover. The Anna Nicole Smith story meets the first criterion of any news source that is serving what is, by definition, a general readership: it&#8217;s bloody interesting. Why should we media workers - be you an old-school reporter, blogger, editor, photographer - try to impose some technocratic limitations on that cardinal rule between journalist and news consumer&#8230;If it&#8217;s interesting and worth analyzing, then cover it.<br />
I&#8217;ve worked in every old-school medium going - in the UK and now here in the US - and I remember well the days when BBC senior news managers threatened to start establishing corporation-wide rules for what was &#8220;worth&#8221; throwing reporter-power at. Ultimately, you have to allow individual programmes, or sites, or papers, who aim at a GENERAL audience, to edit their own product. Falling into some trendy zeitgeist would be a disaster for reporting everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Friday squibs</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-343504</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Friday squibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-343504</guid>
		<description>[...] New rule: Cover what you do best. Link to the rest. Jeff Jarvis has a suggestion for newspapers and the headline pretty much says it all. Not sure, in an age of media messiness, we need more &#8220;rules,&#8221; but the idea seems sound. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New rule: Cover what you do best. Link to the rest. Jeff Jarvis has a suggestion for newspapers and the headline pretty much says it all. Not sure, in an age of media messiness, we need more &#8220;rules,&#8221; but the idea seems sound. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the anti-thesis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-343407</link>
		<dc:creator>the anti-thesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-343407</guid>
		<description>as a &lt;b&gt;former&lt;/b&gt; news person, I asked and sought out the "best" info on the Libby trial, and wound up at firedoglake.com.

I've been saying this for years in response to some lame-o coverage of some stories. Now, it's very easy to  say, it's up to the reader:
"New Rule: Your Own Best Editor"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a <b>former</b> news person, I asked and sought out the &#8220;best&#8221; info on the Libby trial, and wound up at firedoglake.com.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been saying this for years in response to some lame-o coverage of some stories. Now, it&#8217;s very easy to  say, it&#8217;s up to the reader:<br />
&#8220;New Rule: Your Own Best Editor&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cubbison</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/02/22/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest/#comment-343134</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cubbison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2533#comment-343134</guid>
		<description>It would be easier for a newspaper to start from scratch as a small focused publication that doesn't try to do it all. It would win admirers that way. But as the traditional full-service newspaper tries to become that, all it does is lose readers a handful at a time. A hundred people might miss the stock listings and not care about the TV listings. A hundred others might miss the TV listings and not care about the stocks. When they get together, they'll complain that "there's nothing in the paper anymore." 

It will be interesting to see if a sizeable metropolitan newspaper gets rid of its wire services and becomes like the country weekly that won't have anything about 9/11, the tsunami, Katrina or the Iraq war unless a local person is involved. Maybe a metro tabloid that covers its home turf fiercely is the way to go. Maybe the Christian Science Monitor can become a Parade magazine-like insert for newspapers that have gotten rid of their wires. No more West Coast scores. 

I wouldn't be surprised if, after all this happens, the publisher of a local shopper starts running wire news for that smaller and older group of readers who still aren't at the same place as the future-of-media thinkers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be easier for a newspaper to start from scratch as a small focused publication that doesn&#8217;t try to do it all. It would win admirers that way. But as the traditional full-service newspaper tries to become that, all it does is lose readers a handful at a time. A hundred people might miss the stock listings and not care about the TV listings. A hundred others might miss the TV listings and not care about the stocks. When they get together, they&#8217;ll complain that &#8220;there&#8217;s nothing in the paper anymore.&#8221; </p>
<p>It will be interesting to see if a sizeable metropolitan newspaper gets rid of its wire services and becomes like the country weekly that won&#8217;t have anything about 9/11, the tsunami, Katrina or the Iraq war unless a local person is involved. Maybe a metro tabloid that covers its home turf fiercely is the way to go. Maybe the Christian Science Monitor can become a Parade magazine-like insert for newspapers that have gotten rid of their wires. No more West Coast scores. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if, after all this happens, the publisher of a local shopper starts running wire news for that smaller and older group of readers who still aren&#8217;t at the same place as the future-of-media thinkers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
