<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now this is a valuable community</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:43:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The social media revolution (in 15 minutes)</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-349289</link>
		<dc:creator>The social media revolution (in 15 minutes)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 10:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-349289</guid>
		<description>[...] posts on the rise of collaborative social neworks (Our Spaces rather than MySpaces) and also the Reuters MySpace [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posts on the rise of collaborative social neworks (Our Spaces rather than MySpaces) and also the Reuters MySpace [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Bruno</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-344528</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 04:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-344528</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand... why do we need another closed social network?  Don&#039;t we need a better way to communicate and converse across the financial blogs that already exist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand&#8230; why do we need another closed social network?  Don&#8217;t we need a better way to communicate and converse across the financial blogs that already exist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The social media revolution (in 15 minutes)</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-344421</link>
		<dc:creator>The social media revolution (in 15 minutes)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-344421</guid>
		<description>[...] be one of the core commnications competencies of the future. Here are examples of two approaches. Reuters (via Jeff Jarvis) is going to be using an existing infrastucture (MySpace) to create a network for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be one of the core commnications competencies of the future. Here are examples of two approaches. Reuters (via Jeff Jarvis) is going to be using an existing infrastucture (MySpace) to create a network for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurence haughton</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-344358</link>
		<dc:creator>laurence haughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 19:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-344358</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s to stop The Wall Street Journal, the Financial Times, etc from creating their own version later?  Are you suggesting there&#039;s some kind of &quot;first movers&quot; advantage that will accrue to Reuters?  What would it be and what would it be worth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s to stop The Wall Street Journal, the Financial Times, etc from creating their own version later?  Are you suggesting there&#8217;s some kind of &#8220;first movers&#8221; advantage that will accrue to Reuters?  What would it be and what would it be worth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg0658</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-344346</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg0658</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-344346</guid>
		<description>ps - I wonder if NSA analysts spend &quot;on the clock time&quot; (or off - that would be insider trading) padding their bank accounts instead of performing requested tasks. I can&#039;t blame them - it&#039;s human nature. I sure wish we humans could switch off of the cash standard somehow. I think life would be more peaceful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps &#8211; I wonder if NSA analysts spend &#8220;on the clock time&#8221; (or off &#8211; that would be insider trading) padding their bank accounts instead of performing requested tasks. I can&#8217;t blame them &#8211; it&#8217;s human nature. I sure wish we humans could switch off of the cash standard somehow. I think life would be more peaceful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Downes</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-344345</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-344345</guid>
		<description>Ick, Feedburner display ads in your RSS feed. Subscription to this site on the bubble...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ick, Feedburner display ads in your RSS feed. Subscription to this site on the bubble&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg0658</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-344344</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg0658</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-344344</guid>
		<description>Hum - seems like another dilution to me.

Does anyone own the supercomputer that can search out the superstars across various blogs? This cartel could keep those opinions to ones self to become / maintain the trophy of &quot;Fittest Entity&quot; ... besides the NSA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hum &#8211; seems like another dilution to me.</p>
<p>Does anyone own the supercomputer that can search out the superstars across various blogs? This cartel could keep those opinions to ones self to become / maintain the trophy of &#8220;Fittest Entity&#8221; &#8230; besides the NSA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hasan Jafri</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-344341</link>
		<dc:creator>Hasan Jafri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 13:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/03/now-this-is-a-valuable-community/#comment-344341</guid>
		<description>Between Reuters and your earlier post about the BBC on YouTube it looks like  a wave of openness  is coming our way from Britain. It&#039;s not too surprising, though, given how open their daily newspapers such as The Guardian already are. Comment Is Free probably has more open threads than the op-ed sections of The New York Times, Los Angeles Times and USA Today combined. It was a matter of time before the same openness arrived on the financial and business pages. Good deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between Reuters and your earlier post about the BBC on YouTube it looks like  a wave of openness  is coming our way from Britain. It&#8217;s not too surprising, though, given how open their daily newspapers such as The Guardian already are. Comment Is Free probably has more open threads than the op-ed sections of The New York Times, Los Angeles Times and USA Today combined. It was a matter of time before the same openness arrived on the financial and business pages. Good deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
