<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Join the panel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/15/join-the-panel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/15/join-the-panel/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/15/join-the-panel/#comment-344876</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/15/join-the-panel/#comment-344876</guid>
		<description>If getting newspaper editorial board support is so damned important, why don&#039;t candidates spend more money advertising in newspapers?  Or do they covet the endorsement just so they can run a bunch of TV spots hyping the fact?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If getting newspaper editorial board support is so damned important, why don&#8217;t candidates spend more money advertising in newspapers?  Or do they covet the endorsement just so they can run a bunch of TV spots hyping the fact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/15/join-the-panel/#comment-344869</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/15/join-the-panel/#comment-344869</guid>
		<description>I just want to answer this question:  &lt;blockquote&gt;Letâ€™s discuss the danger of the gotcha moment, henceforth known as the macaca moment. Do we need to be more forgiving of gaffes when we hear more? If we want the candidates to be more human do we need to accept their human falliblity?&lt;/blockquote&gt;The problem of human fallibility is not new to the era of online campaigning and blogging.  For a long time, MSM journalists and opposing canddiates have done research into the past on candidates, looking for just this sort of &quot;Macaca Moment&quot; in which a candidate makes some sort of gaffe.  Witness the broadcasting of President Bush&#039;s comments to those next to him when he happened to me micced up.  

Far too often we think some sort of mistake is an example of racism, sexism, or just plain mean heartedness.  But mistakes are a part of human life and we cannot expect our leaders to be perfect or without error in their past.  If we did, we would have to have canddiates raised in a monestary or convent and trotted out just prior to the race, muzzled to prevent misstatements and handled to within an inch of their lives.  What result do we get, someone who has no concept of the problems faced by real people in teh real world.  Not a very good trade off.

The difficulty is that modern technology has made the &quot;Macaca Moment&quot; easy to record and dessminate.  That we in the blogosphere routinely aid and abet such dissemination does not make it news or newsworthy.  In the end, it will be incumbent upon each blogger/reporter to judge for themselves whether one incident is worthy of reporting.  I tend to think not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to answer this question:<br />
<blockquote>Letâ€™s discuss the danger of the gotcha moment, henceforth known as the macaca moment. Do we need to be more forgiving of gaffes when we hear more? If we want the candidates to be more human do we need to accept their human falliblity?</p></blockquote>
<p>The problem of human fallibility is not new to the era of online campaigning and blogging.  For a long time, MSM journalists and opposing canddiates have done research into the past on candidates, looking for just this sort of &#8220;Macaca Moment&#8221; in which a candidate makes some sort of gaffe.  Witness the broadcasting of President Bush&#8217;s comments to those next to him when he happened to me micced up.  </p>
<p>Far too often we think some sort of mistake is an example of racism, sexism, or just plain mean heartedness.  But mistakes are a part of human life and we cannot expect our leaders to be perfect or without error in their past.  If we did, we would have to have canddiates raised in a monestary or convent and trotted out just prior to the race, muzzled to prevent misstatements and handled to within an inch of their lives.  What result do we get, someone who has no concept of the problems faced by real people in teh real world.  Not a very good trade off.</p>
<p>The difficulty is that modern technology has made the &#8220;Macaca Moment&#8221; easy to record and dessminate.  That we in the blogosphere routinely aid and abet such dissemination does not make it news or newsworthy.  In the end, it will be incumbent upon each blogger/reporter to judge for themselves whether one incident is worthy of reporting.  I tend to think not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/15/join-the-panel/#comment-344862</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/15/join-the-panel/#comment-344862</guid>
		<description>Good questions, Jeff.

But, sheesh, how long is that panel going to last?  I hope you&#039;ve got a good 5-6 hours!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good questions, Jeff.</p>
<p>But, sheesh, how long is that panel going to last?  I hope you&#8217;ve got a good 5-6 hours!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Orren</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/15/join-the-panel/#comment-344860</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Orren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/15/join-the-panel/#comment-344860</guid>
		<description>Everyone talks about how new media effects the presidential race? What about city council and school board races in cities and small towns?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone talks about how new media effects the presidential race? What about city council and school board races in cities and small towns?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Newmark</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/15/join-the-panel/#comment-344859</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Newmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/15/join-the-panel/#comment-344859</guid>
		<description>how do we deal with deliberate disinformation campaigns run by professionals, like swiftboaters?

Craig
craig@craigslist.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how do we deal with deliberate disinformation campaigns run by professionals, like swiftboaters?</p>
<p>Craig<br />
<a href="mailto:craig@craigslist.org">craig@craigslist.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

