<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Me vs NYT at OPA re WWGD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eve</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-372601</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-372601</guid>
		<description>Google the new God? It becomes a more viable solution everyday. No doubt people will talk about the Prophet G in 2000 years time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google the new God? It becomes a more viable solution everyday. No doubt people will talk about the Prophet G in 2000 years time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Guardian column: Whither the destination (and brand)?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-360616</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Guardian column: Whither the destination (and brand)?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-360616</guid>
		<description>[...] and I got into a theatrical tiff over my contention that we in media should all be asking WWGD (What would Google do) and getting ourselves distributed widely. Martin held that some brands are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and I got into a theatrical tiff over my contention that we in media should all be asking WWGD (What would Google do) and getting ourselves distributed widely. Martin held that some brands are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howardowens.com: media blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News now is all about time</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358851</link>
		<dc:creator>howardowens.com: media blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News now is all about time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358851</guid>
		<description>[...] Maybe. Google news offers two sorts (relevance and date), and it&#8217;s never a bad idea to ask yourself &#8220;what would Google do.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Maybe. Google news offers two sorts (relevance and date), and it&#8217;s never a bad idea to ask yourself &#8220;what would Google do.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: softexpose.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Site or network? Own or join?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358548</link>
		<dc:creator>softexpose.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Site or network? Own or join?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 02:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358548</guid>
		<description>[...] WWGD. What would Google do? Google would network. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WWGD. What would Google do? Google would network. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-08-29 &#171; David Black</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358456</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-08-29 &#171; David Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358456</guid>
		<description>[...] Me vs NYT at OPA re WWGD - BuzzMachine &#8220;We were arguing about the centralized-v-distributed architecture of media. Martin is arguing that some media brands â€” yes, the Times â€” are worth coming to,,, I say that they all â€” yes, even the Times â€” must look at new ways in which we can do mor (tags: internet newspapers newspapersites journalism distribution unbundling aggregators blogging nyt) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Me vs NYT at OPA re WWGD - BuzzMachine &#8220;We were arguing about the centralized-v-distributed architecture of media. Martin is arguing that some media brands â€” yes, the Times â€” are worth coming to,,, I say that they all â€” yes, even the Times â€” must look at new ways in which we can do mor (tags: internet newspapers newspapersites journalism distribution unbundling aggregators blogging nyt) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contentious.com - links for 2007-08-28</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358425</link>
		<dc:creator>contentious.com - links for 2007-08-28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358425</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» Me vs NYT at OPA re WWGD &#8220;We were also disagreeing about something more fundamental or at least refreshingly different from the old blogger-v-msm debate. We were arguing about the centralized-v-distributed architecture of media.&#8221; (tags: adversarial events controversy blogging journalism mindset media+evolution tidbits+fodder) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» Me vs NYT at OPA re WWGD &#8220;We were also disagreeing about something more fundamental or at least refreshingly different from the old blogger-v-msm debate. We were arguing about the centralized-v-distributed architecture of media.&#8221; (tags: adversarial events controversy blogging journalism mindset media+evolution tidbits+fodder) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Vs. Thinking&#8217; Watch: OPA in London &#124; Television Blog Online</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358401</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Vs. Thinking&#8217; Watch: OPA in London &#124; Television Blog Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358401</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis points us to video from a panel he was on at the Online Publishers Association conference in London last week that presents yet another case [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis points us to video from a panel he was on at the Online Publishers Association conference in London last week that presents yet another case [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wfstuff.info &#187; â€˜Vs. Thinkingâ€™ Watch: OPA in London</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358394</link>
		<dc:creator>wfstuff.info &#187; â€˜Vs. Thinkingâ€™ Watch: OPA in London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358394</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis points us to video from a panel he was on at the Online Publishers Association conference in London last week that presents yet another case [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis points us to video from a panel he was on at the Online Publishers Association conference in London last week that presents yet another case [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Vs. Thinking&#8217; Watch: OPA in London - Lost Remote TV Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358390</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Vs. Thinking&#8217; Watch: OPA in London - Lost Remote TV Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358390</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis points us to video from a panel he was on at the Online Publishers Association conference in London last week that presents yet another case [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis points us to video from a panel he was on at the Online Publishers Association conference in London last week that presents yet another case [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WWAD?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358383</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WWAD?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-358383</guid>
		<description>[...] Kara Swisher is pleased to be a part of an Amanda Congdon report and so am I. Amanda&#8217;s smitted with the catch-question WWGD. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kara Swisher is pleased to be a part of an Amanda Congdon report and so am I. Amanda&#8217;s smitted with the catch-question WWGD. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Site or network? Own or join?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-356988</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Site or network? Own or join?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-356988</guid>
		<description>[...] WWGD. What would Google do? Google would network. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WWGD. What would Google do? Google would network. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Is &#8216;What would Google do&#8217; really the right question? &#124; Digital Markets &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-350241</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Is &#8216;What would Google do&#8217; really the right question? &#124; Digital Markets &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-350241</guid>
		<description>[...] Is &#34;Google&#160;the new God,&#34; as Jeff Jarvis not so modestly proclaims? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is &quot;Google&nbsp;the new God,&quot; as Jeff Jarvis not so modestly proclaims? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WWGD: What has Google done?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-350030</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WWGD: What has Google done?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 22:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-350030</guid>
		<description>[...] So once again, even as we make our own articles, we should be following Google&#8217;s example and asking WWGD. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So once again, even as we make our own articles, we should be following Google&#8217;s example and asking WWGD. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Smartest media quote of the year</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-349807</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Smartest media quote of the year</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-349807</guid>
		<description>[...] their mental map of the world and realize that they are not at center, we are. What they defined as inside is outside. This requires them to turn their world inside out. CBS is doing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their mental map of the world and realize that they are not at center, we are. What they defined as inside is outside. This requires them to turn their world inside out. CBS is doing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More sand</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-349411</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More sand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 22:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-349411</guid>
		<description>[...] Well said. The problem for the controllers of media is that they still want to be and think they can be in control. But the obvious rule of nature is that we will be in control whenever we can be and we will cede it only unwillingly, only by necessity. So the key is to find out how to succeed by enabling us to do what we want to do. That is what the technology companies &#8212; Google, Facebook, et al &#8212; do. How can media companies do likewise? WWGD? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well said. The problem for the controllers of media is that they still want to be and think they can be in control. But the obvious rule of nature is that we will be in control whenever we can be and we will cede it only unwillingly, only by necessity. So the key is to find out how to succeed by enabling us to do what we want to do. That is what the technology companies &#8212; Google, Facebook, et al &#8212; do. How can media companies do likewise? WWGD? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donloeb.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-03-22</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-346027</link>
		<dc:creator>donloeb.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-03-22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-346027</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» Me vs NYT at OPA re WWGD (tags: jeffjarvis nytimes yahoo google) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» Me vs NYT at OPA re WWGD (tags: jeffjarvis nytimes yahoo google) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howardowens.com: media blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yahoo and Google, two different media models</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-345384</link>
		<dc:creator>howardowens.com: media blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yahoo and Google, two different media models</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-345384</guid>
		<description>[...] don&#8217;t usually do quotes of the day, but this bit from Jeff Jarvis deserves to stand on its own with no commentary from me: I talked about Yahoo as the last old media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] don&#8217;t usually do quotes of the day, but this bit from Jeff Jarvis deserves to stand on its own with no commentary from me: I talked about Yahoo as the last old media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tansley</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-345375</link>
		<dc:creator>Tansley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-345375</guid>
		<description>Correx:  ...with what WAS evolving out here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correx:  &#8230;with what WAS evolving out here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tansley</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-345374</link>
		<dc:creator>Tansley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-345374</guid>
		<description>Journalist - Blogger - Metajournalist - Metablogger...whatever.  I started reading you because you were firmly on-target with what what evolving out here.

Sticks and stones.  The media evolves regardless of what anyone wants to believe.  It's all about OPTIONS.  I may still read a newspaper, but it's because one is delivered to my DESK every day...more often than not I'll finish my online newsreading first, since that's where I get the bulk of my world news.  Then I'll check the paper for the local stuff, drive home, check out the News Hour on PBS, and later for entertainment, I might even put on a vinyl album of old time radio programs...or I might just read the latest SF novel I've purchased...unless I'm writing...

The concept of being able to RESPOND to journalists is, to me, like being handed the key to the city.  Not only is it almost impossible for anyone to do anything that affects others anymore without it being reported somewhere...it's now almost impossible to do so and not get feedback on it...and THAT is the natural evolution of democracy, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journalist - Blogger - Metajournalist - Metablogger&#8230;whatever.  I started reading you because you were firmly on-target with what what evolving out here.</p>
<p>Sticks and stones.  The media evolves regardless of what anyone wants to believe.  It&#8217;s all about OPTIONS.  I may still read a newspaper, but it&#8217;s because one is delivered to my DESK every day&#8230;more often than not I&#8217;ll finish my online newsreading first, since that&#8217;s where I get the bulk of my world news.  Then I&#8217;ll check the paper for the local stuff, drive home, check out the News Hour on PBS, and later for entertainment, I might even put on a vinyl album of old time radio programs&#8230;or I might just read the latest SF novel I&#8217;ve purchased&#8230;unless I&#8217;m writing&#8230;</p>
<p>The concept of being able to RESPOND to journalists is, to me, like being handed the key to the city.  Not only is it almost impossible for anyone to do anything that affects others anymore without it being reported somewhere&#8230;it&#8217;s now almost impossible to do so and not get feedback on it&#8230;and THAT is the natural evolution of democracy, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-345318</link>
		<dc:creator>David Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-345318</guid>
		<description>pwned: Jeff, it seems to come down to who "owns" what. My sense is the dead tree guys feel that we, as readers, belong to them; they own our attention and intend to find every way possible to resell it. Not that ad supported media shouldn't be doing that but they also need to find creative ways to add value and create wealth in game-changing creative collaboration and innovation. Low marks for them on plays well with others. More and more this sounds like legacy media playing Pope Leo X to your Martin Luther. In this case 95+ bloggers have already spread the word, the message is way, way out there. Whereas the NYT folks might want it to be day one in Wittenberg, we are far beyond that moment. I applaud your efforts to move the conversation forward to some productive and far more interesting ends. FYI - hope - reading in Dave Winer this AM a Timesman has set up a NYT Twitter account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pwned: Jeff, it seems to come down to who &#8220;owns&#8221; what. My sense is the dead tree guys feel that we, as readers, belong to them; they own our attention and intend to find every way possible to resell it. Not that ad supported media shouldn&#8217;t be doing that but they also need to find creative ways to add value and create wealth in game-changing creative collaboration and innovation. Low marks for them on plays well with others. More and more this sounds like legacy media playing Pope Leo X to your Martin Luther. In this case 95+ bloggers have already spread the word, the message is way, way out there. Whereas the NYT folks might want it to be day one in Wittenberg, we are far beyond that moment. I applaud your efforts to move the conversation forward to some productive and far more interesting ends. FYI - hope - reading in Dave Winer this AM a Timesman has set up a NYT Twitter account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-345290</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-345290</guid>
		<description>What check is there on media?

Suppose that Pinch decided to print that the earth was flat.  What would stop him?  (His cite-checkers could find support for that proposition.)

They may think that they have layers, but they're a parfait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What check is there on media?</p>
<p>Suppose that Pinch decided to print that the earth was flat.  What would stop him?  (His cite-checkers could find support for that proposition.)</p>
<p>They may think that they have layers, but they&#8217;re a parfait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Danicki &#187; WWGD?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-345239</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Danicki &#187; WWGD?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-345239</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis: Yahoo [is] the last old media company to look at the world this way (along with all the older media companies): â€˜We control content. We market to get you to come to us. Then we feed you as much advertising as we can, until you leave.â€™ Thatâ€™s the centralized model of media. I contrasted this with the decentralized, distributed model embodied by nobody better than Google: â€˜We go to where you are and put service and advertising there. Your pageview is then our pageview. And we have enabled you to do what you want to do. And we can all do more of it.â€™&#8230;[M]edia companies should ask WWGD â€” â€˜what would Google do?â€™ (and, yes, Google is the new God).   Posted by Jackie Danicki &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis: Yahoo [is] the last old media company to look at the world this way (along with all the older media companies): â€˜We control content. We market to get you to come to us. Then we feed you as much advertising as we can, until you leave.â€™ Thatâ€™s the centralized model of media. I contrasted this with the decentralized, distributed model embodied by nobody better than Google: â€˜We go to where you are and put service and advertising there. Your pageview is then our pageview. And we have enabled you to do what you want to do. And we can all do more of it.â€™&#8230;[M]edia companies should ask WWGD â€” â€˜what would Google do?â€™ (and, yes, Google is the new God).   Posted by Jackie Danicki | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptiousNut</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-345232</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptiousNut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/18/me-v-nyt-at-opa-over-wwgd/#comment-345232</guid>
		<description>The NYT has raise cluelessness to dizzying heights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NYT has raise cluelessness to dizzying heights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
