<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pulver does God&#8217;s work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/20/pulver-does-gods-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/20/pulver-does-gods-work/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 07:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/20/pulver-does-gods-work/#comment-345566</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/20/pulver-does-gods-work/#comment-345566</guid>
		<description>Good causes can be undermined by weak advocates making weak arguments, and that appears to be happening with this Pulver character: 

&lt;i&gt;Internet Video is an American-led phenomenon that allows professionals and non-professionals alike to produce a wide variety of high-quality video content and to make it available to anyone, anywhere, at any time, and at little or no incremental cost to anyone.&lt;/i&gt;

Lame and misleading. It would be best for all concerned if he kept his feelings to himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good causes can be undermined by weak advocates making weak arguments, and that appears to be happening with this Pulver character: </p>
<p><i>Internet Video is an American-led phenomenon that allows professionals and non-professionals alike to produce a wide variety of high-quality video content and to make it available to anyone, anywhere, at any time, and at little or no incremental cost to anyone.</i></p>
<p>Lame and misleading. It would be best for all concerned if he kept his feelings to himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Elbows</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/20/pulver-does-gods-work/#comment-345519</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Elbows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/20/pulver-does-gods-work/#comment-345519</guid>
		<description>Im not sure about that Steve Tatta, well at least the bit about not having time to setup an association - I didnt read anything about an association, but rather a petition to the FCC, something I believe Pulver has done sucessfully back when the V stood for Voice rather than video.

What Im interested in is exactly what sort of regulation people fear, because I read the EU stuff that was rfernced, and a lot of it is to do with regulation of advertising. I support various forms of regulation of advertising, though obviously the devil is in the detail.

I have been a rather vocal critic of Pulver's network 2 venture, so I am prone to be cynical about the motives and timing of this stuff, but it could still be an actual initiative that does something, time will tell. Certainly I think its publicity for network2, something they need to be able to succeed. But a lot of the awareness of network2 seems to be amoungst industry people, due to the sorts of people such publicity techniques reach, and I guess network2 really need the masses of potential viewers to hear of them, im not sure that this FCC stuff will be a vehicle to achieve that. Thats the sort of thing the netowrk2 commpetition was supposed to achieve I assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im not sure about that Steve Tatta, well at least the bit about not having time to setup an association - I didnt read anything about an association, but rather a petition to the FCC, something I believe Pulver has done sucessfully back when the V stood for Voice rather than video.</p>
<p>What Im interested in is exactly what sort of regulation people fear, because I read the EU stuff that was rfernced, and a lot of it is to do with regulation of advertising. I support various forms of regulation of advertising, though obviously the devil is in the detail.</p>
<p>I have been a rather vocal critic of Pulver&#8217;s network 2 venture, so I am prone to be cynical about the motives and timing of this stuff, but it could still be an actual initiative that does something, time will tell. Certainly I think its publicity for network2, something they need to be able to succeed. But a lot of the awareness of network2 seems to be amoungst industry people, due to the sorts of people such publicity techniques reach, and I guess network2 really need the masses of potential viewers to hear of them, im not sure that this FCC stuff will be a vehicle to achieve that. Thats the sort of thing the netowrk2 commpetition was supposed to achieve I assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Tatta</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/20/pulver-does-gods-work/#comment-345517</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Tatta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/20/pulver-does-gods-work/#comment-345517</guid>
		<description>All this press release is doing is trying to get some marketing for pulver during his conference. The website and press release don't actually say how they are going to do any of this and what it plasn to accomplish. We've seen this many times before. Someone says they are starting an association and then some members get together and end up doing nothing for the industry. Pulver does not even have time to answer his own e-mails let alone do this properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this press release is doing is trying to get some marketing for pulver during his conference. The website and press release don&#8217;t actually say how they are going to do any of this and what it plasn to accomplish. We&#8217;ve seen this many times before. Someone says they are starting an association and then some members get together and end up doing nothing for the industry. Pulver does not even have time to answer his own e-mails let alone do this properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Chapman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/20/pulver-does-gods-work/#comment-345505</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/20/pulver-does-gods-work/#comment-345505</guid>
		<description>Great job.  This is will be a massive fight.  Keep us posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job.  This is will be a massive fight.  Keep us posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
