<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cranky meets cranky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/21/cranky-meets-cranky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/21/cranky-meets-cranky/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Kellogg</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/21/cranky-meets-cranky/#comment-346059</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Kellogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/21/cranky-meets-cranky/#comment-346059</guid>
		<description>Unlike Tansley I was not redirected. On the other hand, the page didn't fully load. So you're getting my questions here anyway.

Mr. Dvorak...

Was the decision to put the vowels under the left hand deliberate, or because every other space on the keyboard was ... what?

How long do you give the lever before people tire of it and go back to brute strength to lift things?

How bad a failure was fire?

If code was poetry --- as the WordPress people insist --- how much shorter would the coding for Windows Vista be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike Tansley I was not redirected. On the other hand, the page didn&#8217;t fully load. So you&#8217;re getting my questions here anyway.</p>
<p>Mr. Dvorak&#8230;</p>
<p>Was the decision to put the vowels under the left hand deliberate, or because every other space on the keyboard was &#8230; what?</p>
<p>How long do you give the lever before people tire of it and go back to brute strength to lift things?</p>
<p>How bad a failure was fire?</p>
<p>If code was poetry &#8212; as the WordPress people insist &#8212; how much shorter would the coding for Windows Vista be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Weaver</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/21/cranky-meets-cranky/#comment-345597</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Weaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/21/cranky-meets-cranky/#comment-345597</guid>
		<description>Glad *you* wrrote this headline, Jeff :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad *you* wrrote this headline, Jeff <img src='http://www.buzzmachine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tansley</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/21/cranky-meets-cranky/#comment-345595</link>
		<dc:creator>Tansley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/03/21/cranky-meets-cranky/#comment-345595</guid>
		<description>Okay, I clicked the Cranky Geeks link referring to questions for you, and it sent me back HERE...  You can use or not use this question as you like...

1) Do you consider the Hillary attack vid to be a harbinger of a new paradigm of campaign interactivity?  Specifically - here's a person with not only the technical savvy to put together a totally professional, high-quality piece - but with the historic perspective to use the leitmotif that helped keep Apple a viable company for years: think different.  Obviously this person has a MIND.  The question is, will it encourage others with both the tech smarts and the historical savvy to put their own efforts into influencing things further?  Was their use of the Apple imagry theft, or flattery, or allegory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I clicked the Cranky Geeks link referring to questions for you, and it sent me back HERE&#8230;  You can use or not use this question as you like&#8230;</p>
<p>1) Do you consider the Hillary attack vid to be a harbinger of a new paradigm of campaign interactivity?  Specifically - here&#8217;s a person with not only the technical savvy to put together a totally professional, high-quality piece - but with the historic perspective to use the leitmotif that helped keep Apple a viable company for years: think different.  Obviously this person has a MIND.  The question is, will it encourage others with both the tech smarts and the historical savvy to put their own efforts into influencing things further?  Was their use of the Apple imagry theft, or flattery, or allegory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
