<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: County censors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Fester</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/#comment-347377</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Fester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/#comment-347377</guid>
		<description>You know, the censoring program is probably in place to keep the employees from wandering the Net, and the public is caught in the lockdown.

Not that government employees would do that.....or private sector employees either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, the censoring program is probably in place to keep the employees from wandering the Net, and the public is caught in the lockdown.</p>
<p>Not that government employees would do that&#8230;..or private sector employees either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/#comment-347290</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 16:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/#comment-347290</guid>
		<description>But brie and merlot are so yesterday, I'll bet only heartland conservatives nosh and imbibe it. 

I did not need access to discuss the case so, Mumblix, your argument is as leaky as a wine glass made of Kleenex. 

I do think there is a principle at work here: The county (or possibly the state) offers access and then decides what we can and cannot see. They prevent me from seeing and publishing to the sites I want. There can be no argument about children; children do not use the service. This is government censorship, pure and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But brie and merlot are so yesterday, I&#8217;ll bet only heartland conservatives nosh and imbibe it. </p>
<p>I did not need access to discuss the case so, Mumblix, your argument is as leaky as a wine glass made of Kleenex. </p>
<p>I do think there is a principle at work here: The county (or possibly the state) offers access and then decides what we can and cannot see. They prevent me from seeing and publishing to the sites I want. There can be no argument about children; children do not use the service. This is government censorship, pure and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve baker</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/#comment-347289</link>
		<dc:creator>steve baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 16:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/#comment-347289</guid>
		<description>Interesting that Mumblix G. suggests that you want to gossip over brie and merlot.  Would it be any different if the gossiping took place over pork rinds and beer? Or is the implication that the only people who complain about things like censorship are privileged and liberal elites who don't have more important things to grumble about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that Mumblix G. suggests that you want to gossip over brie and merlot.  Would it be any different if the gossiping took place over pork rinds and beer? Or is the implication that the only people who complain about things like censorship are privileged and liberal elites who don&#8217;t have more important things to grumble about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mumblix Grumph</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/#comment-347209</link>
		<dc:creator>Mumblix Grumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 14:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/#comment-347209</guid>
		<description>Do you feel that your civil rights would be violated if the judge tells you to not discuss your case over the weekend?  Isn't he infringing on your God-given right to gossip with your friends over brie and merlot?

The ACLU lawyers can go back to headquarters...this is a false alarm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you feel that your civil rights would be violated if the judge tells you to not discuss your case over the weekend?  Isn&#8217;t he infringing on your God-given right to gossip with your friends over brie and merlot?</p>
<p>The ACLU lawyers can go back to headquarters&#8230;this is a false alarm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: countertop</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/#comment-347133</link>
		<dc:creator>countertop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 18:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/#comment-347133</guid>
		<description>Heh

Your lucky

I had a hearing to attend in Prince George's County Maryland and they wouldn't let me bring either my laptop or my cell phone into the court house because both had built in cameras.

And I am a lawyer trying to represent my client!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh</p>
<p>Your lucky</p>
<p>I had a hearing to attend in Prince George&#8217;s County Maryland and they wouldn&#8217;t let me bring either my laptop or my cell phone into the court house because both had built in cameras.</p>
<p>And I am a lawyer trying to represent my client!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/#comment-347126</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 16:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/#comment-347126</guid>
		<description>Hmm ... this might be an interesting test. According to civil-liberties groups, censorware is difficult to circumvent, while according to the US goverment, censorware is easy to circumvent. So which is it? Can you circumvent it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm &#8230; this might be an interesting test. According to civil-liberties groups, censorware is difficult to circumvent, while according to the US goverment, censorware is easy to circumvent. So which is it? Can you circumvent it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tansley</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/#comment-347124</link>
		<dc:creator>Tansley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 16:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/06/county-censors/#comment-347124</guid>
		<description>As you well know, Jeff, all jury trials in New Jersey are matters of National Security...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you well know, Jeff, all jury trials in New Jersey are matters of National Security&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
