<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portfolio preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rexblog.com: Rex Hammock&#8217;s weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Portfolio countdown</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347829</link>
		<dc:creator>rexblog.com: Rex Hammock&#8217;s weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Portfolio countdown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347829</guid>
		<description>[...] business magazine, Portfolio. After he read* my whinning post the other day oozing jealously that Jeff Jarvis got to preview the magazine&#8217;s website while all I got was an umbrella, CondÃ© Nast Business president and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] business magazine, Portfolio. After he read* my whinning post the other day oozing jealously that Jeff Jarvis got to preview the magazine&#8217;s website while all I got was an umbrella, CondÃ© Nast Business president and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talking Biz News &#187; An exclusive look at Portfolio&#8217;s web site</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347737</link>
		<dc:creator>Talking Biz News &#187; An exclusive look at Portfolio&#8217;s web site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347737</guid>
		<description>[...] more here.   Posted by Chris Roush [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here.   Posted by Chris Roush [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347723</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 01:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347723</guid>
		<description>I hope I'm wrong, but this looks like an expensive flop in the making, the web side anyway. Building a presence on the web is completely different than in any other environment, and whenever established companies--specifically their marketing people--try to deliberately create another (or yet another) new place for people to go, they seem to have a lot of trouble as Zach wrote above. I think that part of the problem is that there's what I would describe as a "broadcast" mentality at work, in which people think that a strong brand (which clearly Conde has no trouble developing) is capable in of itself of packaging together disparate pieces of content to attract a sustainable level of traffic. 

That may work fine for a magazine, newspaper, or TV show, where competition is limited &#38; barriers to entry are high, but the web is an altogether different animal. I realize that maybe part of this thinking reflects a dependency on longstanding brand advertiser relationships and/or ad agency sloth and conservatism, but web audiences--or perhaps more accurately, the interests of each person on the web--could simply be too fragmented for this approach to work. 

I notice that there's been no discussion of Conde Nast's teen-oriented Flip site (288,000 visitors in March according to ComScore), which granted has only been around for a little while. On paper it looks like it could be a winner (though it is a little derivative) due in part to the emphasis on UGC, but the question is always how do you get people to go there when so many other sites out there do the same thing just as well if not better--and are run by ten people with no overhead and no marketing budget?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope I&#8217;m wrong, but this looks like an expensive flop in the making, the web side anyway. Building a presence on the web is completely different than in any other environment, and whenever established companies&#8211;specifically their marketing people&#8211;try to deliberately create another (or yet another) new place for people to go, they seem to have a lot of trouble as Zach wrote above. I think that part of the problem is that there&#8217;s what I would describe as a &#8220;broadcast&#8221; mentality at work, in which people think that a strong brand (which clearly Conde has no trouble developing) is capable in of itself of packaging together disparate pieces of content to attract a sustainable level of traffic. </p>
<p>That may work fine for a magazine, newspaper, or TV show, where competition is limited &amp; barriers to entry are high, but the web is an altogether different animal. I realize that maybe part of this thinking reflects a dependency on longstanding brand advertiser relationships and/or ad agency sloth and conservatism, but web audiences&#8211;or perhaps more accurately, the interests of each person on the web&#8211;could simply be too fragmented for this approach to work. </p>
<p>I notice that there&#8217;s been no discussion of Conde Nast&#8217;s teen-oriented Flip site (288,000 visitors in March according to ComScore), which granted has only been around for a little while. On paper it looks like it could be a winner (though it is a little derivative) due in part to the emphasis on UGC, but the question is always how do you get people to go there when so many other sites out there do the same thing just as well if not better&#8211;and are run by ten people with no overhead and no marketing budget?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Coelius</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347718</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Coelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347718</guid>
		<description>Great post as usual.  What I find curious is that I find it hard to think of a single web property started by mainstream media that has really succeeded in a big way.  Maybe I am being dense but all I can see is lots of money spent and little achieved.  We'll see though.  Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post as usual.  What I find curious is that I find it hard to think of a single web property started by mainstream media that has really succeeded in a big way.  Maybe I am being dense but all I can see is lots of money spent and little achieved.  We&#8217;ll see though.  Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; With A Week Until Launch, The Buzz About Conde Nast Portfolioâ€™s Site Photo Morgue: Where dead photos lay</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347716</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; With A Week Until Launch, The Buzz About Conde Nast Portfolioâ€™s Site Photo Morgue: Where dead photos lay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347716</guid>
		<description>[...] will be hitting stands next week and its companion website will be released in conjunction. Jeff Jarvis was given a sneak preview of the site and, after detailing a skein of disclosures, he pronounces it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will be hitting stands next week and its companion website will be released in conjunction. Jeff Jarvis was given a sneak preview of the site and, after detailing a skein of disclosures, he pronounces it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347715</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347715</guid>
		<description>I, like Jarvis, must make my own disclaimer, that being that I worked alongside Ari Brandt at Yahoo! 

Portfolio will be interesting for many reasons, not the least of which the amount of muscle behind the Digital side - and the double-barreled approach Conde is taking to bringing it to market. And it will be a bit of a betting man's game to see which side of the house prospers.

Knowing Brandt's history at Yahoo! makes me curious to see what will be rolled out in the weeks and months to come. Experience suggests it will be more than shovel/brochure ware as the one thing that Yahoo! instills in its people, despite some other shortcomings, is understanding advertiser's needs and bringing those advertisers the audience they desire. 

This leads me to believe Portfolio (Digital) may be the tail that wags the dog and will help bring some of the more high end consumer goods marketers into the online realm. And as the luxury goods market is yet to really explode on the web - Portfolio, among other things, might be the digital home for all the LVMH and PPR brands that want to reach the Alpha Consumer/Overachiever in the comfort of their own boardroom or luxury suite. 

And that might be a good thing for Conde Nast's portfolio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, like Jarvis, must make my own disclaimer, that being that I worked alongside Ari Brandt at Yahoo! </p>
<p>Portfolio will be interesting for many reasons, not the least of which the amount of muscle behind the Digital side - and the double-barreled approach Conde is taking to bringing it to market. And it will be a bit of a betting man&#8217;s game to see which side of the house prospers.</p>
<p>Knowing Brandt&#8217;s history at Yahoo! makes me curious to see what will be rolled out in the weeks and months to come. Experience suggests it will be more than shovel/brochure ware as the one thing that Yahoo! instills in its people, despite some other shortcomings, is understanding advertiser&#8217;s needs and bringing those advertisers the audience they desire. </p>
<p>This leads me to believe Portfolio (Digital) may be the tail that wags the dog and will help bring some of the more high end consumer goods marketers into the online realm. And as the luxury goods market is yet to really explode on the web - Portfolio, among other things, might be the digital home for all the LVMH and PPR brands that want to reach the Alpha Consumer/Overachiever in the comfort of their own boardroom or luxury suite. </p>
<p>And that might be a good thing for Conde Nast&#8217;s portfolio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347696</link>
		<dc:creator>J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347696</guid>
		<description>serious competition for &lt;a href="http://www.monocle.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Monocle&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>serious competition for <a href="http://www.monocle.com" rel="nofollow">Monocle</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NXTblog - The blog of NXTbook Media &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Portfolio Poised to Launch</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347688</link>
		<dc:creator>NXTblog - The blog of NXTbook Media &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Portfolio Poised to Launch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347688</guid>
		<description>[...] Conde Naste&#8217;s portfolio has gotten some buzz over at Jeff Jarvis&#8217;s blog, where he got a preview of their website. What&#8217;s to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Conde Naste&#8217;s portfolio has gotten some buzz over at Jeff Jarvis&#8217;s blog, where he got a preview of their website. What&#8217;s to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Hodgkin</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347684</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Hodgkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347684</guid>
		<description>Some follow on thoughts (eg in relation to Monocle) here
http://exacteditions.blogspot.com/2007/04/portfolio.html

I am wondering whether a cloud of bloggers can be really helpful in building a community for a monthly publication. The gap in periodicity is a real issue. A daily newspaper and the hourly business-news cycle give conflicting demands -- and the monthly publication cycle is very slooooowwww</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some follow on thoughts (eg in relation to Monocle) here<br />
<a href="http://exacteditions.blogspot.com/2007/04/portfolio.html" rel="nofollow">http://exacteditions.blogspot.com/2007/04/portfolio.html</a></p>
<p>I am wondering whether a cloud of bloggers can be really helpful in building a community for a monthly publication. The gap in periodicity is a real issue. A daily newspaper and the hourly business-news cycle give conflicting demands &#8212; and the monthly publication cycle is very slooooowwww</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jens</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347682</link>
		<dc:creator>jens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/11/portfolio-preview/#comment-347682</guid>
		<description>i like the cn (online-)strategy - clever and daring. 
the german vanifty fair was just launched with an accompanying website and numerous blogs that shake up the national blogosphere quite a bit.  

the navy fighting in pirate-style.
only that they are much better looking and they have all these wonderful resources at hand and easily integrate some outside bloggers too

a very self-confident way of embracing new seas - which are in fact - "blue oceans". - it is a lot of free advertising. and it definitely is a way to build a media brand.

two thumbs up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like the cn (online-)strategy - clever and daring.<br />
the german vanifty fair was just launched with an accompanying website and numerous blogs that shake up the national blogosphere quite a bit.  </p>
<p>the navy fighting in pirate-style.<br />
only that they are much better looking and they have all these wonderful resources at hand and easily integrate some outside bloggers too</p>
<p>a very self-confident way of embracing new seas - which are in fact - &#8220;blue oceans&#8221;. - it is a lot of free advertising. and it definitely is a way to build a media brand.</p>
<p>two thumbs up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
