<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Murdoch clip job</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/25/murdoch-clip-job/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/25/murdoch-clip-job/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: THE MURDOCH-BANCROFTS DEAL at WHAT&#8217;S NEXT: INNOVATIONS IN NEWSPAPERS</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/25/murdoch-clip-job/#comment-353378</link>
		<dc:creator>THE MURDOCH-BANCROFTS DEAL at WHAT&#8217;S NEXT: INNOVATIONS IN NEWSPAPERS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/25/murdoch-clip-job/#comment-353378</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis says in his great blog, they are justÂ  &#8220;absentee [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis says in his great blog, they are justÂ  &#8220;absentee [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Boriss</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/25/murdoch-clip-job/#comment-353288</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Boriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/25/murdoch-clip-job/#comment-353288</guid>
		<description>I'd say it was a "miss-job" instead of a hit-job, and it hit an unintended, though not innocent, bystander.  I've just &lt;a href="http://thefutureofnews.com/2007/06/25/todays-ny-times-miss-piece-on-murdoch-indicts-the-federal-government-not-him/" rel="nofollow"&gt;posted&lt;/a&gt; my take at &lt;a href="http://www.thefutureofnews.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Future of News&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say it was a &#8220;miss-job&#8221; instead of a hit-job, and it hit an unintended, though not innocent, bystander.  I&#8217;ve just <a href="http://thefutureofnews.com/2007/06/25/todays-ny-times-miss-piece-on-murdoch-indicts-the-federal-government-not-him/" rel="nofollow">posted</a> my take at <a href="http://www.thefutureofnews.com" rel="nofollow">The Future of News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
