<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catching up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/26/catching-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/26/catching-up/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jarvis on AOL: &#8220;BFD&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/26/catching-up/#comment-353448</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarvis on AOL: &#8220;BFD&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/26/catching-up/#comment-353448</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis shows amazement at AOL getting coverage on converting their news site into a blog. I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis shows amazement at AOL getting coverage on converting their news site into a blog. I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Today&#8217;s media links: Slimed &#124; Peoria Pundits</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/26/catching-up/#comment-353445</link>
		<dc:creator>Today&#8217;s media links: Slimed &#124; Peoria Pundits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/26/catching-up/#comment-353445</guid>
		<description>[...] has decided it needs to run it&#8217;s news in a blog-style format. Jeff Jarvis says &#8220;BFD.&#8221; Also, Jarvis thinks the New York Times is right to raise its price to $1.25 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has decided it needs to run it&#8217;s news in a blog-style format. Jeff Jarvis says &#8220;BFD.&#8221; Also, Jarvis thinks the New York Times is right to raise its price to $1.25 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C Abell</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/26/catching-up/#comment-353383</link>
		<dc:creator>John C Abell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/26/catching-up/#comment-353383</guid>
		<description>Before we get too excited, or not excited enough, remember that the purpose of a news site is to inform, no to make sure we all get along or participate in some kind of social experiment about equality.

Seconds before this writing AOL News fills its page with the news -- from just after midnight, though updated 20 minutes ago -- that Paris Hilton has been released from jail. It assures me about the importance of this event by placing it under a banner that says: "Top Stories Right Now" (I digress, but isn't the "Right Now" part redundant, a little shout of unneeded emphasis that tries to convince me of something we both know isn't true?) And yes, I see on AOL the tiny list of "latest headlines" to the right of Paris' head, a nod to the "see -- we are actually prioritizing the news!" criticism they must have anticipated.

Yahoo!, using the same amount of above-the-fold space, tells me "U.S. troops target bomb networks," "Pivotal vote looms on immigration," and "Firefighters gain ground on Calif. blaze." 

Sorry -- this is news, and it isn't good.

The "blog" approach is something some news outlets should employ. They should be open to all kinds of new possibilities and experiment and risk failure. My own mantra is that the solution to the woes facing small newspapers will be addressed, in part, by their use of "real blogs with real people and real voices," as Jeff says.

But at the national level, it looks like a major disservice masquerading as hip that panders to an audience who doesn't know what they are missing -- literally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before we get too excited, or not excited enough, remember that the purpose of a news site is to inform, no to make sure we all get along or participate in some kind of social experiment about equality.</p>
<p>Seconds before this writing AOL News fills its page with the news &#8212; from just after midnight, though updated 20 minutes ago &#8212; that Paris Hilton has been released from jail. It assures me about the importance of this event by placing it under a banner that says: &#8220;Top Stories Right Now&#8221; (I digress, but isn&#8217;t the &#8220;Right Now&#8221; part redundant, a little shout of unneeded emphasis that tries to convince me of something we both know isn&#8217;t true?) And yes, I see on AOL the tiny list of &#8220;latest headlines&#8221; to the right of Paris&#8217; head, a nod to the &#8220;see &#8212; we are actually prioritizing the news!&#8221; criticism they must have anticipated.</p>
<p>Yahoo!, using the same amount of above-the-fold space, tells me &#8220;U.S. troops target bomb networks,&#8221; &#8220;Pivotal vote looms on immigration,&#8221; and &#8220;Firefighters gain ground on Calif. blaze.&#8221; </p>
<p>Sorry &#8212; this is news, and it isn&#8217;t good.</p>
<p>The &#8220;blog&#8221; approach is something some news outlets should employ. They should be open to all kinds of new possibilities and experiment and risk failure. My own mantra is that the solution to the woes facing small newspapers will be addressed, in part, by their use of &#8220;real blogs with real people and real voices,&#8221; as Jeff says.</p>
<p>But at the national level, it looks like a major disservice masquerading as hip that panders to an audience who doesn&#8217;t know what they are missing &#8212; literally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Breeze</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/26/catching-up/#comment-353380</link>
		<dc:creator>James Breeze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/26/catching-up/#comment-353380</guid>
		<description>Yes! and notice that when you go to a newspaper site the most interesting and up-to-date content is found in the user discussion board at the end of the articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! and notice that when you go to a newspaper site the most interesting and up-to-date content is found in the user discussion board at the end of the articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Boriss</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/26/catching-up/#comment-353376</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Boriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/06/26/catching-up/#comment-353376</guid>
		<description>Funny historical fact.  What they are presenting as a "blog" is actually about 500 years old.  The forerunner of newspapers were handwritten newsletters invented in Venice during the Renaissance, and called "Gazzettes."  News was presented in reverse chronological order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny historical fact.  What they are presenting as a &#8220;blog&#8221; is actually about 500 years old.  The forerunner of newspapers were handwritten newsletters invented in Venice during the Renaissance, and called &#8220;Gazzettes.&#8221;  News was presented in reverse chronological order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
