<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Murdoch victorious?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/06/murdoch-victorious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/06/murdoch-victorious/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:54:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James HH</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/06/murdoch-victorious/#comment-354450</link>
		<dc:creator>James HH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/06/murdoch-victorious/#comment-354450</guid>
		<description>Steve, 

Check out today&#039;s MediaGuardian 100 for the low-down on RM. Hope it&#039;s no problem publishing the link, whilst you&#039;re there you can check out this great regular column from a guy called Jeff Jarvis.... 

http://media.guardian.co.uk/top100/0,,500000,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, </p>
<p>Check out today&#8217;s MediaGuardian 100 for the low-down on RM. Hope it&#8217;s no problem publishing the link, whilst you&#8217;re there you can check out this great regular column from a guy called Jeff Jarvis&#8230;. </p>
<p><a href="http://media.guardian.co.uk/top100/0,,500000,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://media.guardian.co.uk/top100/0,,500000,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penny</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/06/murdoch-victorious/#comment-354333</link>
		<dc:creator>penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 00:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/06/murdoch-victorious/#comment-354333</guid>
		<description>Does Times Select, charging to read content on a website, make any sense?, hardly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Times Select, charging to read content on a website, make any sense?, hardly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Clancy</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/06/murdoch-victorious/#comment-354325</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Clancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/06/murdoch-victorious/#comment-354325</guid>
		<description>Why is Murdoch considered a tech-savvy publisher? Yes he bought MySpace, but MySpace really hasn&#039;t grown much under his ownership, in fact its probably lost ground to Facebook. Fox News and the NY Post both have awful Web sites - not even looking at the actual content. They don&#039;t allow comments, they&#039;re poorly designed, and they dont do multimedia very well. Yet Murdoch is hailed as a hero who will usher the newspaper biz into the future. For all its feet dragging, the NY Times seems to be doing a much better job than any of the News Corp. sites. So what&#039;s so great about Murdoch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Murdoch considered a tech-savvy publisher? Yes he bought MySpace, but MySpace really hasn&#8217;t grown much under his ownership, in fact its probably lost ground to Facebook. Fox News and the NY Post both have awful Web sites &#8211; not even looking at the actual content. They don&#8217;t allow comments, they&#8217;re poorly designed, and they dont do multimedia very well. Yet Murdoch is hailed as a hero who will usher the newspaper biz into the future. For all its feet dragging, the NY Times seems to be doing a much better job than any of the News Corp. sites. So what&#8217;s so great about Murdoch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
