<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The hack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: avneron</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/#comment-354569</link>
		<dc:creator>avneron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/#comment-354569</guid>
		<description>i heard an interview with him on NPR a few weeks ago.
he made very weak arguments. and the interviewer (i think it was Brian Lehrer) did not do a good enough job in digging deeper.

does not worth buying the book. and probably should not get airtime either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i heard an interview with him on NPR a few weeks ago.<br />
he made very weak arguments. and the interviewer (i think it was Brian Lehrer) did not do a good enough job in digging deeper.</p>
<p>does not worth buying the book. and probably should not get airtime either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tansley - addendum</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/#comment-354556</link>
		<dc:creator>Tansley - addendum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/#comment-354556</guid>
		<description>For Ms. Conrad:
You both overestimate the weight the Times carries, and underestimate the regard many of us hold for people like Jeff.

It IS possible to be an intellectual without being an effete snob, as is the fashion of Mr. Keen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Ms. Conrad:<br />
You both overestimate the weight the Times carries, and underestimate the regard many of us hold for people like Jeff.</p>
<p>It IS possible to be an intellectual without being an effete snob, as is the fashion of Mr. Keen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Conrad</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/#comment-354520</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/#comment-354520</guid>
		<description>The NYT did not find this book to be useless piffle. You'll argue that the review is from the gasping mouth of old media. But without an actual debate, you leave we readers of both Keen and Jarvis at an ambivalent impasse. Not fun. Not productive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NYT did not find this book to be useless piffle. You&#8217;ll argue that the review is from the gasping mouth of old media. But without an actual debate, you leave we readers of both Keen and Jarvis at an ambivalent impasse. Not fun. Not productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le culte de l&#8217;amateur, encore</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/#comment-354382</link>
		<dc:creator>Le culte de l&#8217;amateur, encore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/#comment-354382</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis revient un brin sur le livre &#8220;The cult of the amateur&#8221; d&#8217;Andrew Keen. Comme plusieurs autres, Jarvis a refusÃ© de dÃ©battre avec l&#8217;auteur, jugeant que ce serait une mauvaise idÃ©e d&#8217;accorder de l&#8217;importance Ã  ce livre mal foutu. &#8220;I said the book is just plain bad. Itâ€™s sloppily researched and written. It is link- and PR-bait disguised as a polemic. If it were intelligently, thoughtfully presented, Iâ€™d be happy to talk about these ideas. But itâ€™s not. The irony is that Keen accuses us all of being hacks but his book is just a hack. I told them I chose not to play into this publicity mill on my blog and wouldnâ€™t do so on the air, either. Hereâ€™s the interesting part: They each said theyâ€™d heard just this same perspective from a lot of people theyâ€™d called looking for debaters.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis revient un brin sur le livre &#8220;The cult of the amateur&#8221; d&#8217;Andrew Keen. Comme plusieurs autres, Jarvis a refusÃ© de dÃ©battre avec l&#8217;auteur, jugeant que ce serait une mauvaise idÃ©e d&#8217;accorder de l&#8217;importance Ã  ce livre mal foutu. &#8220;I said the book is just plain bad. Itâ€™s sloppily researched and written. It is link- and PR-bait disguised as a polemic. If it were intelligently, thoughtfully presented, Iâ€™d be happy to talk about these ideas. But itâ€™s not. The irony is that Keen accuses us all of being hacks but his book is just a hack. I told them I chose not to play into this publicity mill on my blog and wouldnâ€™t do so on the air, either. Hereâ€™s the interesting part: They each said theyâ€™d heard just this same perspective from a lot of people theyâ€™d called looking for debaters.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evelyn Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/#comment-354368</link>
		<dc:creator>Evelyn Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/#comment-354368</guid>
		<description>Great response! Keen is always harping about our culture being "destroyed," as if his contributions to culture and beauty and art and literature and civilization are anything more than PR drivel, fluff and fanfare for himself. 

I think the Web medium is one way to push the envelope of creativity and language, and we're surfing the edges of our own culture rather than having be spoon-fed to us by the appropriately appointed "culture engineers," as Terence McKenna would say. 

Short sweet video of McKenna talking about cultural diversion, and reclaiming our own culture - and mind and soul: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARIG-BQRATs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great response! Keen is always harping about our culture being &#8220;destroyed,&#8221; as if his contributions to culture and beauty and art and literature and civilization are anything more than PR drivel, fluff and fanfare for himself. </p>
<p>I think the Web medium is one way to push the envelope of creativity and language, and we&#8217;re surfing the edges of our own culture rather than having be spoon-fed to us by the appropriately appointed &#8220;culture engineers,&#8221; as Terence McKenna would say. </p>
<p>Short sweet video of McKenna talking about cultural diversion, and reclaiming our own culture - and mind and soul:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARIG-BQRATs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARIG-BQRATs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike G</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/#comment-354363</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 17:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/#comment-354363</guid>
		<description>There you bloggers go, lowering NPR to your level...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There you bloggers go, lowering NPR to your level&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amyloo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/#comment-354357</link>
		<dc:creator>Amyloo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 13:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/07/the-hack/#comment-354357</guid>
		<description>Excellent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
