<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death of the TV critic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/21/death-of-the-tv-critic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/21/death-of-the-tv-critic/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Quixote</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/21/death-of-the-tv-critic/#comment-355093</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Quixote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/21/death-of-the-tv-critic/#comment-355093</guid>
		<description>Virginia Heffernan is seems to be one of the very few people covering online video who seems to have much depth to draw from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virginia Heffernan is seems to be one of the very few people covering online video who seems to have much depth to draw from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Stodder</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/21/death-of-the-tv-critic/#comment-355067</link>
		<dc:creator>John Stodder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/21/death-of-the-tv-critic/#comment-355067</guid>
		<description>Jeff, your use of the Shister quote is more than a little unfair. You make her seem rather grandiose about her beat, but that&#039;s not accurate.  I clicked over to the link and here&#039;s the full context:

&quot;Shister says she&#039;s equally perplexed by the trend.

&quot;&#039;We&#039;re seeing it in all the popular arts, (with) papers cutting back on movie and rock music critics,&#039; she says. &#039;It&#039;s mind-boggling. In my experience, readers have a virtually insatiable appetite for any news about television. If there&#039;s one beat that&#039;s sacrosanct, it should be TV.&#039;&quot;

You make it seem as if she thinks there&#039;s nothing more important than writing reviews of TV shows.  That&#039;s not what she&#039;s saying, as the quote above makes clear.  She&#039;s saying the audience for &quot;news about television&quot; has an &quot;insatiable appetite.&quot;  

Obviously, you&#039;re enjoying a little too much schadenfreude about her fate, but if you thought a second or two longer about her comment, she&#039;s saying her newspaper is choosing to drop a popular feature, despite evident reader interest.  Shister questions this strategy.  Haven&#039;t you also questioned this strategy elsewhere on this blog?  

I don&#039;t recall you demanding that newspapers try to survive by giving their readers broccoli only.  Quite the reverse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, your use of the Shister quote is more than a little unfair. You make her seem rather grandiose about her beat, but that&#8217;s not accurate.  I clicked over to the link and here&#8217;s the full context:</p>
<p>&#8220;Shister says she&#8217;s equally perplexed by the trend.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;We&#8217;re seeing it in all the popular arts, (with) papers cutting back on movie and rock music critics,&#8217; she says. &#8216;It&#8217;s mind-boggling. In my experience, readers have a virtually insatiable appetite for any news about television. If there&#8217;s one beat that&#8217;s sacrosanct, it should be TV.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>You make it seem as if she thinks there&#8217;s nothing more important than writing reviews of TV shows.  That&#8217;s not what she&#8217;s saying, as the quote above makes clear.  She&#8217;s saying the audience for &#8220;news about television&#8221; has an &#8220;insatiable appetite.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obviously, you&#8217;re enjoying a little too much schadenfreude about her fate, but if you thought a second or two longer about her comment, she&#8217;s saying her newspaper is choosing to drop a popular feature, despite evident reader interest.  Shister questions this strategy.  Haven&#8217;t you also questioned this strategy elsewhere on this blog?  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t recall you demanding that newspapers try to survive by giving their readers broccoli only.  Quite the reverse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marjorie</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/21/death-of-the-tv-critic/#comment-354969</link>
		<dc:creator>Marjorie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 01:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/21/death-of-the-tv-critic/#comment-354969</guid>
		<description>Sadly, this is a growing trend as print publications are seeing their budgets and circulations slashed. It&#039;s all the buzz this week at the TCA (Television Critics Association) press tour. Unless they get their blog on soon, the majority of TCA members will be attending the winter tour next year without health insurance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, this is a growing trend as print publications are seeing their budgets and circulations slashed. It&#8217;s all the buzz this week at the TCA (Television Critics Association) press tour. Unless they get their blog on soon, the majority of TCA members will be attending the winter tour next year without health insurance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Chapel</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/21/death-of-the-tv-critic/#comment-354943</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Chapel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/21/death-of-the-tv-critic/#comment-354943</guid>
		<description>Once a TV critic... always a TV critic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once a TV critic&#8230; always a TV critic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Boriss</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/21/death-of-the-tv-critic/#comment-354916</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Boriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/07/21/death-of-the-tv-critic/#comment-354916</guid>
		<description>Yes, and we will particularly be watching the death of the &lt;i&gt;local&lt;/i&gt; critic.  There is no reason to have people in each metro area covering the same mass audience TV/movie productions when we could have a handful of the most talented do it for the whole country. This will be an example of a â€œproductivity gainâ€ our economy will get from the Internet (Steve Boriss, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.TheFutureOfNews.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Future of News&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, and we will particularly be watching the death of the <i>local</i> critic.  There is no reason to have people in each metro area covering the same mass audience TV/movie productions when we could have a handful of the most talented do it for the whole country. This will be an example of a â€œproductivity gainâ€ our economy will get from the Internet (Steve Boriss, <a href="http://www.TheFutureOfNews.com" rel="nofollow">The Future of News</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

