Comments on: Guardian column: YouTube debate

By: dini videolar

dini videolar — Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:06:52 +0000

Much!like your site and your comments. Comment too perfect. I recommend your site to buddylist. wep here to enjoy the site as a quote to write reviews of your site. I hope to publish an excerpt with your signature that does not mind. thank you admin 25-2-2011_3_7_42

By: Katharina Waldvogel

Katharina Waldvogel — Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:51:00 +0000

Reminds me of:I got the bill for my surgery. Now I know what those doctors were wearing masks for. ~James H. Boren

By: jonny goldstein

jonny goldstein — Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:36:28 +0000

I think having the debate as it was was much better than the previous debates, even with its shortcomings. Having non-pros ask questions felt good, and despite some fluff questions, yielded some interesting questions asked in interesting ways.

By: ITV News falls into the citizen journalism trap « Online Journalism Blog

ITV News falls into the citizen journalism trap « Online Journalism Blog — Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:07:26 +0000

[...] inclined to agree with Jeff Jarvis, who said of the CNN-YouTube election debate experiment: TV doesnâ€™t know how to have a conversation. TV knows how to perform. The eventâ€™s moderator, [...]

By: Greg

Greg — Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:28:11 +0000

It’s a shame that the Republican candidates (minus The Mayor and McCain) might feel degraded by participating in a YouTube debate. They focus on YouTube the brand, the website where kids can post videos of skateboarding accidents or stupid experiments with Mentos and Coke! They don’t get YouTube the medium or more broadly the interaction of people-to-people online conversation. The potential for citizen input and constituent/candidate dialog is immense, if only they would participate in the burgeoning online video medium and get past their YouTube stigmas and stereotypes.