<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls Weblog &#183; Looking toward life beyond advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-361439</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls Weblog &#183; Looking toward life beyond advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-361439</guid>
		<description>[...] also points to Jeff Jarvis, responding to this report, which says online advertising will be bigger than newspaper advertising by 2011: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also points to Jeff Jarvis, responding to this report, which says online advertising will be bigger than newspaper advertising by 2011: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-08-13 &#171; David Black</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356806</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-08-13 &#171; David Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356806</guid>
		<description>[...] Media evolution - BuzzMachine &#8220;our total media usage is declining, though whatâ€™s interesting to me is that part of this, they say, comes from efficiency&#8221; And time spent on consumer-supported media grew 19.8% (2001-6 CAGR), vs decline of 6.3% on ad-supported media. (tags: internet advertising marketsize audience newspapers stats trends migration forecasts) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Media evolution &#8211; BuzzMachine &#8220;our total media usage is declining, though whatâ€™s interesting to me is that part of this, they say, comes from efficiency&#8221; And time spent on consumer-supported media grew 19.8% (2001-6 CAGR), vs decline of 6.3% on ad-supported media. (tags: internet advertising marketsize audience newspapers stats trends migration forecasts) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riley Central &#187; Brave New World, Without Advertising!</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356663</link>
		<dc:creator>Riley Central &#187; Brave New World, Without Advertising!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356663</guid>
		<description>[...] also points to Jeff Jarvis, responding to this report, which says online advertising will be bigger than newspaper advertising by 2011: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also points to Jeff Jarvis, responding to this report, which says online advertising will be bigger than newspaper advertising by 2011: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leading Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356536</link>
		<dc:creator>Leading Questions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356536</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Quick Takes: Another Cue to the Growing Conversation...&lt;/strong&gt;

Doc Searls points to a posting by Terry Heaton who points to a posting by Jeff Jarvis who is commenting on this report on the shift in advertising usage . Here are a few quotes. Terry Heaton: Nielsen has released...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Quick Takes: Another Cue to the Growing Conversation&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Doc Searls points to a posting by Terry Heaton who points to a posting by Jeff Jarvis who is commenting on this report on the shift in advertising usage . Here are a few quotes. Terry Heaton: Nielsen has released&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Stabler</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356447</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stabler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356447</guid>
		<description>0.5%?  

Any idea what the margin of error on this data may be?

Also, they forecast low single digit growth for newspaper advertising in U.S. over the next several years.

Given recent results from several Npp companies (ad revenue down as much as 12% y/y), somehow I just don&#039;t see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0.5%?  </p>
<p>Any idea what the margin of error on this data may be?</p>
<p>Also, they forecast low single digit growth for newspaper advertising in U.S. over the next several years.</p>
<p>Given recent results from several Npp companies (ad revenue down as much as 12% y/y), somehow I just don&#8217;t see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tansley - addendum</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356385</link>
		<dc:creator>Tansley - addendum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 23:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356385</guid>
		<description>And this is really no surprise at all.

When a portal user, or anyone seeking out news directly, hits a home page, there are all the story headlines for them to choose from.  A few clicks, and the specific pieces they want are read.

What is pushing the expansion of advertising spending is more intelligent design in advertising, as well as targeting specific demographics.  Those wonderful &#039;cookies&#039; that get left on our machines enable sophisticated software to glean our browsing habits, supplying adverstising more directly targeted to specific consumers&#039; browsing habits and intersts.  AND, advertising designers and studios are shying away from insulting our intelligence and are focusing instead on blending entertainment into the advertising they create.  This draws the viewer in, and guarantees that there will be a memory trigger left behind after the laughter, or whatever, has passed...

     The best ads are so good that you wish they&#039;d go ON a bit further.  That is the real artistry in advertising.  It&#039;s going to help us, the people who WORK in advertising, also - Darwin in action - paring out the HACKS and leaving the people with talent.  Nobody likes an ad that bludgeons you with the facts..or screams at you to &#039;BUY!&#039;  It&#039;s far better to entertain...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80sWifG40B0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this is really no surprise at all.</p>
<p>When a portal user, or anyone seeking out news directly, hits a home page, there are all the story headlines for them to choose from.  A few clicks, and the specific pieces they want are read.</p>
<p>What is pushing the expansion of advertising spending is more intelligent design in advertising, as well as targeting specific demographics.  Those wonderful &#8216;cookies&#8217; that get left on our machines enable sophisticated software to glean our browsing habits, supplying adverstising more directly targeted to specific consumers&#8217; browsing habits and intersts.  AND, advertising designers and studios are shying away from insulting our intelligence and are focusing instead on blending entertainment into the advertising they create.  This draws the viewer in, and guarantees that there will be a memory trigger left behind after the laughter, or whatever, has passed&#8230;</p>
<p>     The best ads are so good that you wish they&#8217;d go ON a bit further.  That is the real artistry in advertising.  It&#8217;s going to help us, the people who WORK in advertising, also &#8211; Darwin in action &#8211; paring out the HACKS and leaving the people with talent.  Nobody likes an ad that bludgeons you with the facts..or screams at you to &#8216;BUY!&#8217;  It&#8217;s far better to entertain&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80sWifG40B0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80sWifG40B0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurence haughton</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356370</link>
		<dc:creator>laurence haughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356370</guid>
		<description>The &quot;greatest fear&quot; of the advertisers I&#039;ve met (several thousand to date) is not &quot;being [unable] to push unwanted advertising upon the (formerly) more resigned consumer.&quot;  

Their fear is that their money will be wasted and they won&#039;t get no satisfaction.  (It happens a lot.) 

That&#039;s the fear that&#039;s driving this change in advertising spending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;greatest fear&#8221; of the advertisers I&#8217;ve met (several thousand to date) is not &#8220;being [unable] to push unwanted advertising upon the (formerly) more resigned consumer.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Their fear is that their money will be wasted and they won&#8217;t get no satisfaction.  (It happens a lot.) </p>
<p>That&#8217;s the fear that&#8217;s driving this change in advertising spending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrizia Broghammer</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356357</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrizia Broghammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356357</guid>
		<description>I agree with Fred.
The migration to the web is for many reasons.
The economical was the beginning, then other factors kept the readers.
One of them is  the fact that it is the user who choses what and how and when and can say no to unwanted ads, or just ignore them.
To be succesful the advertisement must look more like entertainment than suggestion.
The user is not anymore a passive consumer, he likes to decide and likes to interact.
That explains the huge success of Social Networks.
The marketing of the future has to keep that in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Fred.<br />
The migration to the web is for many reasons.<br />
The economical was the beginning, then other factors kept the readers.<br />
One of them is  the fact that it is the user who choses what and how and when and can say no to unwanted ads, or just ignore them.<br />
To be succesful the advertisement must look more like entertainment than suggestion.<br />
The user is not anymore a passive consumer, he likes to decide and likes to interact.<br />
That explains the huge success of Social Networks.<br />
The marketing of the future has to keep that in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bwl zwei null &#187; Ein neues Blog: Digitale Verlage</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356339</link>
		<dc:creator>bwl zwei null &#187; Ein neues Blog: Digitale Verlage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356339</guid>
		<description>[...] Aufmerksamkeit des Publikums und mit ihr die Werbung wandern immer stÃ¤rker ins Netz, wie aktuell Jeff Jarvis (Buzzmachine) anhand einer Studie fÃ¼r die USA belegt. Lassen wir uns also Ã¼berraschen, was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aufmerksamkeit des Publikums und mit ihr die Werbung wandern immer stÃ¤rker ins Netz, wie aktuell Jeff Jarvis (Buzzmachine) anhand einer Studie fÃ¼r die USA belegt. Lassen wir uns also Ã¼berraschen, was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Gerendasy</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356310</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Gerendasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 03:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356310</guid>
		<description>I wonder if this report, if the trend continues, even more strongly conveys the idea that advertising is not dead, per se,  (or heading in that direct, necessarily) but that it will have to come to terms with advertisers (it seems) greatest fear, not being able to push unwanted advertising upon the (formerly) more resigned consumer.

I think what Dave Winer said eons ago in an interview with Amanda Congdon from Rocketboom was prophetic. Advertising will morph into being more like content, educational and entertaining, and most important, it will be the consumer that makes the decision whether they want to ingest it.

Or, maybe the report means nothing of the kind. Media consumption may be down because Americans whose productivity continues to climb, are simply exhausted, and have no energy for as much media indulgence as before.

I hope for the former!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this report, if the trend continues, even more strongly conveys the idea that advertising is not dead, per se,  (or heading in that direct, necessarily) but that it will have to come to terms with advertisers (it seems) greatest fear, not being able to push unwanted advertising upon the (formerly) more resigned consumer.</p>
<p>I think what Dave Winer said eons ago in an interview with Amanda Congdon from Rocketboom was prophetic. Advertising will morph into being more like content, educational and entertaining, and most important, it will be the consumer that makes the decision whether they want to ingest it.</p>
<p>Or, maybe the report means nothing of the kind. Media consumption may be down because Americans whose productivity continues to climb, are simply exhausted, and have no energy for as much media indulgence as before.</p>
<p>I hope for the former!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356282</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/07/media-evolution/#comment-356282</guid>
		<description>Overall media time may be declining but how people are spending that time is changing.  Time spent with recorded music continues to grow and this is creating a large new advertising opportunity.

Check out the Ad-Supported Music Central blog:
http://ad-supported-music.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall media time may be declining but how people are spending that time is changing.  Time spent with recorded music continues to grow and this is creating a large new advertising opportunity.</p>
<p>Check out the Ad-Supported Music Central blog:<br />
<a href="http://ad-supported-music.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://ad-supported-music.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

