<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The architecture of content and comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The content map and corrections</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-358925</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The content map and corrections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-358925</guid>
		<description>[...] I think there is an elegantly simple solution to the problem of attaching corrections to earlier errors in news: It&#8217;s the link, the tag, and the content map. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I think there is an elegantly simple solution to the problem of attaching corrections to earlier errors in news: It&#8217;s the link, the tag, and the content map. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Bates</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357899</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Bates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357899</guid>
		<description>I suspect the harder problem here will be to actually construct the mapping between the individuals that are involved in the content creation; I suppose a good system, widely used like OpenID, would make that possible.  But I suspect the larger and more interesting question is going to be whether or not people will want to be able to be tracked across the Internet. In my experience, at least, people tend to like to use online personas like a change of clothing -- and truly being trackable will remove that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect the harder problem here will be to actually construct the mapping between the individuals that are involved in the content creation; I suppose a good system, widely used like OpenID, would make that possible.  But I suspect the larger and more interesting question is going to be whether or not people will want to be able to be tracked across the Internet. In my experience, at least, people tend to like to use online personas like a change of clothing &#8212; and truly being trackable will remove that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357823</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357823</guid>
		<description>Google could do (part of) that. 

They could provide you with all the URLs of pages that link to your articles. semantic technology could discern what these connected pages contain (is it a blog, is it a forum, is an online newspaper page etc). So, you coulds see quickly when a new link to one of your articles is created. they could even show you changes to these URLs (meaning comments to comments, how many there are of them, etc).

That would certainly be a start. How cool: you could create an index of the world as it links to Jeff and watch how that changes over time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google could do (part of) that. </p>
<p>They could provide you with all the URLs of pages that link to your articles. semantic technology could discern what these connected pages contain (is it a blog, is it a forum, is an online newspaper page etc). So, you coulds see quickly when a new link to one of your articles is created. they could even show you changes to these URLs (meaning comments to comments, how many there are of them, etc).</p>
<p>That would certainly be a start. How cool: you could create an index of the world as it links to Jeff and watch how that changes over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gauvin</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357806</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gauvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357806</guid>
		<description>okay...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357739</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357739</guid>
		<description>Eric,
No intent to condescend at all; not sure how you hear that. I&#039;m just trying to answer your question and share my best hope for how this can be made elegant and simple. That&#039;s all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,<br />
No intent to condescend at all; not sure how you hear that. I&#8217;m just trying to answer your question and share my best hope for how this can be made elegant and simple. That&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gauvin</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357728</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gauvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357728</guid>
		<description>(Jeff, don&#039;t know if you mean to,  but you seem really condescending...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Jeff, don&#8217;t know if you mean to,  but you seem really condescending&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357721</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357721</guid>
		<description>Well, Eric, so&#039;s the internet, society, and life. But the best response is to find organization it in, making it elegant and simple. Google does that. So does Facebook. So do GoogleMaps. Now I want a combination of all three mapping content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Eric, so&#8217;s the internet, society, and life. But the best response is to find organization it in, making it elegant and simple. Google does that. So does Facebook. So do GoogleMaps. Now I want a combination of all three mapping content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357720</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357720</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine by Jeff Jarvis--&gt;      &#171; The architecture of content and comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine by Jeff Jarvis&#8211;&gt;      &laquo; The architecture of content and comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cubbison</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357719</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cubbison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357719</guid>
		<description>This seems like a job Google ought to be doing in the first place, instead of, or before, peeking in people&#039;s windows with StreetViews or scanning the heavens from Google Earth. Those are cool features, but making sense of the world&#039;s information is more important. But now it seems that Google sees itself as a player, not the scorecard. 

If Google doesn&#039;t do it, who will? The local newspaper? Using human editors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a job Google ought to be doing in the first place, instead of, or before, peeking in people&#8217;s windows with StreetViews or scanning the heavens from Google Earth. Those are cool features, but making sense of the world&#8217;s information is more important. But now it seems that Google sees itself as a player, not the scorecard. </p>
<p>If Google doesn&#8217;t do it, who will? The local newspaper? Using human editors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gauvin</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357714</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gauvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/23/the-architecture-of-content-and-comments/#comment-357714</guid>
		<description>Huh? Sounds complicated...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? Sounds complicated&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

