<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I wouldn&#8217;t go shorting GOOG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wedding Photographers</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-366158</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedding Photographers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-366158</guid>
		<description>Google hasn't made many successful inroads into the social side of the web, and it seems that the likes of Facebook will be hard to counter.  But google is ingenious in some ways, and I have a feeling they will do something soon that will put them on the map in a big way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google hasn&#8217;t made many successful inroads into the social side of the web, and it seems that the likes of Facebook will be hard to counter.  But google is ingenious in some ways, and I have a feeling they will do something soon that will put them on the map in a big way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle S.</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-359131</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 06:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-359131</guid>
		<description>Google will adapt.  It's that simple.  They understand the market is and will be changing.  It's not about information, it's about advertising and they have and will continue to attract the advertising revenue based on their rep and stats.  New media and social networks to kill Google?  Pshaw!  They will incorporate these into their existing business.  Everyone else is doing it and so will they.

Cheers!
Danielle
www.studiozone.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google will adapt.  It&#8217;s that simple.  They understand the market is and will be changing.  It&#8217;s not about information, it&#8217;s about advertising and they have and will continue to attract the advertising revenue based on their rep and stats.  New media and social networks to kill Google?  Pshaw!  They will incorporate these into their existing business.  Everyone else is doing it and so will they.</p>
<p>Cheers!<br />
Danielle<br />
<a href="http://www.studiozone.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.studiozone.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358467</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 03:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358467</guid>
		<description>Although google electrified me back in 1999 it's now too superficial for my needs. When Scoble speaks of algorithms he means people such as me routinely skipping to page 3 of a google search to save time by jumping over the topmost cruft. For all its faults Wikipedia typically enables me to go deep fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although google electrified me back in 1999 it&#8217;s now too superficial for my needs. When Scoble speaks of algorithms he means people such as me routinely skipping to page 3 of a google search to save time by jumping over the topmost cruft. For all its faults Wikipedia typically enables me to go deep fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Obstructionist &#187; What hath Scoble nailed to the door?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358438</link>
		<dc:creator>The Obstructionist &#187; What hath Scoble nailed to the door?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358438</guid>
		<description>[...] advocated online companies adopt a WWGD mantra, completely&#8211;and respectfully&#8211; disagrees. He also, I know, must disagree with the Extreme CU of Scoble&#8217;s can&#8217;t-contain-it face [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] advocated online companies adopt a WWGD mantra, completely&#8211;and respectfully&#8211; disagrees. He also, I know, must disagree with the Extreme CU of Scoble&#8217;s can&#8217;t-contain-it face [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerd Kamp</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358436</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerd Kamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358436</guid>
		<description>I definitely second Matthias opinion. Not only blogs, but all the people in MSM i talked with about this interview were wondering about the rationale behind it. It is so obvious that expertise in the field definitely is not the reason.

Just two remarks:

1. Even if GOOG is dead in 10 years. The company or companies that will substitute them will definitely not be MSM companies (at least companies headed by managers like Mr. DuMont SchÃ¼tte. I'm not sure if  Mr. SchÃ¼tte is aware of the fact that he is acknowledging this when he is saying:  "The lifecycle of internet ideas, in terms of content and technology, is completely different from conventional companies in the old economy. . . ."

2. But at least Mr.SchÃ¼tte should be knowledgeable wrt. MSM facts. I especially would be very interested in the reasoning that led him to a 9 Billion Euro figure that MSM companies in Germany spend for news gathering each year. That would be around 60 times the news gathering budget of the NYT and at least 100 times the revenue of germanys biggest news agency dpa (disclosure: i'm working for the online subsidiary of dpa). BTW: Does anybody know the aggregated news gathering budget of american newspapers (media companies or a pointer where i can find them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely second Matthias opinion. Not only blogs, but all the people in MSM i talked with about this interview were wondering about the rationale behind it. It is so obvious that expertise in the field definitely is not the reason.</p>
<p>Just two remarks:</p>
<p>1. Even if GOOG is dead in 10 years. The company or companies that will substitute them will definitely not be MSM companies (at least companies headed by managers like Mr. DuMont SchÃ¼tte. I&#8217;m not sure if  Mr. SchÃ¼tte is aware of the fact that he is acknowledging this when he is saying:  &#8220;The lifecycle of internet ideas, in terms of content and technology, is completely different from conventional companies in the old economy. . . .&#8221;</p>
<p>2. But at least Mr.SchÃ¼tte should be knowledgeable wrt. MSM facts. I especially would be very interested in the reasoning that led him to a 9 Billion Euro figure that MSM companies in Germany spend for news gathering each year. That would be around 60 times the news gathering budget of the NYT and at least 100 times the revenue of germanys biggest news agency dpa (disclosure: i&#8217;m working for the online subsidiary of dpa). BTW: Does anybody know the aggregated news gathering budget of american newspapers (media companies or a pointer where i can find them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Warfield</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358434</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Warfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358434</guid>
		<description>It's the dynamics of the Big Competitors that make this interesting.  I don't think Mahalo will knock off Google.  I'm not sure Scoble does either, I think he just writes headlines that drive readership.

OTOH, Seth mentioned Yahoo way up top.  Yahoo, Microsoft, and many others large and small don't want Google to own the front door to the Web.  They have the power to do some revolutionary things that are in the spirit of what Scoble has suggested:

http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/social-graph-search-engines-part-3/

Will an Open Social Network Search ever be created?  Hard to say.  People have a hard time cooperating most of the time, and then other times it happens very suddenly.

The one thing Scoble is absolutely right about is that Social Networks need to factor into Page Rank.

Cheers,

BW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the dynamics of the Big Competitors that make this interesting.  I don&#8217;t think Mahalo will knock off Google.  I&#8217;m not sure Scoble does either, I think he just writes headlines that drive readership.</p>
<p>OTOH, Seth mentioned Yahoo way up top.  Yahoo, Microsoft, and many others large and small don&#8217;t want Google to own the front door to the Web.  They have the power to do some revolutionary things that are in the spirit of what Scoble has suggested:</p>
<p><a href="http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/social-graph-search-engines-part-3/" rel="nofollow">http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/social-graph-search-engines-part-3/</a></p>
<p>Will an Open Social Network Search ever be created?  Hard to say.  People have a hard time cooperating most of the time, and then other times it happens very suddenly.</p>
<p>The one thing Scoble is absolutely right about is that Social Networks need to factor into Page Rank.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>BW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358426</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358426</guid>
		<description>My experience is that NEWCO rarely "kills" ESTABLISHEDCO. Typically, markets get bigger, product offerings get more robust, and marketshare shifts around. IF a company does implode its typically the fault of the management NOT because of the external factor. 

That being said, NEWCOs in the search space can build a very robust business with even a small % of the ever expanding global search traffic marketplace.

*That* being said, Scoble is correct in that HUMANS+MACHINES+SOCIAL NETWORKS will ALWAYS be better than machines or social networks alone. 

It's going to be a VERY interesting five years.

all the best,

Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience is that NEWCO rarely &#8220;kills&#8221; ESTABLISHEDCO. Typically, markets get bigger, product offerings get more robust, and marketshare shifts around. IF a company does implode its typically the fault of the management NOT because of the external factor. </p>
<p>That being said, NEWCOs in the search space can build a very robust business with even a small % of the ever expanding global search traffic marketplace.</p>
<p>*That* being said, Scoble is correct in that HUMANS+MACHINES+SOCIAL NETWORKS will ALWAYS be better than machines or social networks alone. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be a VERY interesting five years.</p>
<p>all the best,</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonny goldstein</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358414</link>
		<dc:creator>jonny goldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358414</guid>
		<description>Also, Google is making moves into telephony. Called 1-800-GOOG-411 lately? Definitely don't count 'em out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Google is making moves into telephony. Called 1-800-GOOG-411 lately? Definitely don&#8217;t count &#8216;em out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358406</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358406</guid>
		<description>Mr. DuMont SchÃ¼tte got a lot of replies in german blogs for his "expertise" about Google. The interview with him is really worth reading as it shows that this man hasn't yet understood very much about the internet, its dynamics and logic. 

It's bit a bit different with Robert Scoble as he knows much better about what he is talking. Anyway I do agree with you and not with him: It is too early to take Facebook (and others) as a dangerous thread for Google yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. DuMont SchÃ¼tte got a lot of replies in german blogs for his &#8220;expertise&#8221; about Google. The interview with him is really worth reading as it shows that this man hasn&#8217;t yet understood very much about the internet, its dynamics and logic. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s bit a bit different with Robert Scoble as he knows much better about what he is talking. Anyway I do agree with you and not with him: It is too early to take Facebook (and others) as a dangerous thread for Google yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358403</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/i-wouldnt-go-shorting-goog/#comment-358403</guid>
		<description>I thought of you as soon as he looked into the screen and whispered "watch Yahoo". Jeff, Do you really think Yahoo's over? Or are they a "wildcard"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought of you as soon as he looked into the screen and whispered &#8220;watch Yahoo&#8221;. Jeff, Do you really think Yahoo&#8217;s over? Or are they a &#8220;wildcard&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
