<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethink a newspaper? Heaven forbid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/rethink-a-newspaper-heaven-forbid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/rethink-a-newspaper-heaven-forbid/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/rethink-a-newspaper-heaven-forbid/#comment-358554</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 03:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/rethink-a-newspaper-heaven-forbid/#comment-358554</guid>
		<description>Excellent analysis as always Steve. Allow me to also note the role of British newspaper &lt;i&gt;slap and tickle&lt;/i&gt; shtick as articulated by &lt;a href="http://www.michaelyon-online.com/wp/there-be-dragons.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Michael Yon&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;blockquote&gt;
The British press often plays slap and tickle: they issue sharp-tongued remarks about American troops (slap), while moments later shamelessly gratifying hometown readers with reports about the superiority of British troops (tickle).
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent analysis as always Steve. Allow me to also note the role of British newspaper <i>slap and tickle</i> shtick as articulated by <a href="http://www.michaelyon-online.com/wp/there-be-dragons.htm" rel="nofollow">Michael Yon</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>
The British press often plays slap and tickle: they issue sharp-tongued remarks about American troops (slap), while moments later shamelessly gratifying hometown readers with reports about the superiority of British troops (tickle).
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/rethink-a-newspaper-heaven-forbid/#comment-358405</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/rethink-a-newspaper-heaven-forbid/#comment-358405</guid>
		<description>Forgive my self-interest in this, but here are two splendid examples of newspapers that thought boldly about design, story forms, content etc. when they changed paper size: The Kansas City Star and the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. You can find links to today's front page of each from the corporate homepage at www.mcclatchy.com.

\-\/\/

P.S. IN KC, daily circulation is even with last year and online uniques up +30% ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive my self-interest in this, but here are two splendid examples of newspapers that thought boldly about design, story forms, content etc. when they changed paper size: The Kansas City Star and the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. You can find links to today&#8217;s front page of each from the corporate homepage at <a href="http://www.mcclatchy.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mcclatchy.com</a>.</p>
<p>\-\/\/</p>
<p>P.S. IN KC, daily circulation is even with last year and online uniques up +30% &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Boriss</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/rethink-a-newspaper-heaven-forbid/#comment-358404</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Boriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/28/rethink-a-newspaper-heaven-forbid/#comment-358404</guid>
		<description>He's right.  Read my post "&lt;a href="http://thefutureofnews.com/2007/08/15/londons-viewsy-witty-and-naughty-newspapers-point-to-the-future-of-online-news/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Londonâ€™s viewsy, witty, and naughty newspapers point to the future of online news&lt;/a&gt;" at &lt;a href="http://www.thefutureofnews.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Future of News&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s right.  Read my post &#8220;<a href="http://thefutureofnews.com/2007/08/15/londons-viewsy-witty-and-naughty-newspapers-point-to-the-future-of-online-news/" rel="nofollow">Londonâ€™s viewsy, witty, and naughty newspapers point to the future of online news</a>&#8221; at <a href="http://www.thefutureofnews.com" rel="nofollow">The Future of News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
