Comments on: Business 2.0 - publishing 1.0 = 0 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/ by Jeff Jarvis Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:46:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Sans Internet, la presse meure » Adverbe.com - Ecrire pour le Web, formation, travail en réseau à distance, conseil éditorial, rédaction http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-377068 Sans Internet, la presse meure » Adverbe.com - Ecrire pour le Web, formation, travail en réseau à distance, conseil éditorial, rédaction Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:43:05 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-377068 [...] est un non sens pour un magazine comme le rappelle Alexis qui nous a traduit l’opinion de Jeff Jarvis sur ce décès prématuré :  ” Pourquoi diable [Business 2.0] n’a pas commencé ou [...] [...] est un non sens pour un magazine comme le rappelle Alexis qui nous a traduit l’opinion de Jeff Jarvis sur ce décès prématuré :  ” Pourquoi diable [Business 2.0] n’a pas commencé ou [...]

]]> By: KoopTech » Medien » Business 2.0 - vom Magazin zur Community? http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-373614 KoopTech » Medien » Business 2.0 - vom Magazin zur Community? Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:45:13 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-373614 [...] Ähnlich sieht das auch Jeff Jarvis, der schrieb: [...] [...] Ähnlich sieht das auch Jeff Jarvis, der schrieb: [...]

]]> By: Agel http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-373218 Agel Sun, 13 Apr 2008 03:57:56 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-373218 Business 2.0 was a good read, much more interesting than Fortune and highly relevant to today’s business. I wonder if Time will fold the mag into Fortune? Business 2.0 was a good read, much more interesting than Fortune and highly relevant to today’s business. I wonder if Time will fold the mag into Fortune?

]]> By: Serge Lescouarnec http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-360350 Serge Lescouarnec Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:30:00 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-360350 Jeff I wonder if the (ugly to my taste) redesign of the magazine hurt it as well, at least its image. I did like the stories though. Has their demise got to do with being a monthly? Serge 'The French Guy from New Jersey' Blog http://www.sergetheconcierge.com Jeff

I wonder if the (ugly to my taste) redesign of the magazine hurt it as well, at least its image.

I did like the stories though.

Has their demise got to do with being a monthly?

Serge
‘The French Guy from New Jersey’
Blog
http://www.sergetheconcierge.com

]]> By: Sean Schroeder http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359505 Sean Schroeder Sat, 08 Sep 2007 16:26:33 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359505 This is truly a bummer...I LOVED Business 2.0 and looked forward to every issue. I have to agree with Jeff's analysis, they totally 1.0'd it. Fast company would have been a great fit for them, too bad that wasn't an option. I'm gonna miss it. This is truly a bummer…I LOVED Business 2.0 and looked forward to every issue. I have to agree with Jeff’s analysis, they totally 1.0′d it. Fast company would have been a great fit for them, too bad that wasn’t an option. I’m gonna miss it.

]]> By: Matt Keegan http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359318 Matt Keegan Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:12:35 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359318 Man, what a bummer. I had recently referenced a "fun to read" article from that magazine, but now it will cease publication after the October 2007 issue. Business 2.0 was a good read, much more interesting than Fortune and highly relevant to today's business. I wonder if Time will fold the mag into Fortune? Man, what a bummer. I had recently referenced a “fun to read” article from that magazine, but now it will cease publication after the October 2007 issue.

Business 2.0 was a good read, much more interesting than Fortune and highly relevant to today’s business. I wonder if Time will fold the mag into Fortune?

]]> By: Hoover’s Business Insight Zone » R.I.P., Business 2.0 - Hoover's http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359317 Hoover’s Business Insight Zone » R.I.P., Business 2.0 - Hoover's Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:54:00 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359317 [...] Jarvis shares some short but apt thoughts on B2.0’s demise. Key excerpt: Business 2.0 should not have been a product but a community; [...] [...] Jarvis shares some short but apt thoughts on B2.0’s demise. Key excerpt: Business 2.0 should not have been a product but a community; [...]

]]> By: afsd http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359309 afsd Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:35:17 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359309 i subscribed till 2009. i don't trust aol time warner anymore. big freaking billion dollar company can't send paper to half a million people. i subscribed till 2009.

i don’t trust aol time warner anymore.

big freaking billion dollar company can’t send paper to half a million
people.

]]> By: Transnets » Blog Archive » Assistez à Office 2.0 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359284 Transnets » Blog Archive » Assistez à Office 2.0 Thu, 06 Sep 2007 06:23:48 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359284 [...] est toujours une triste nouvelle pour un journaliste, mais j’apprécie particulièrement le commentaire de Jeff Jarvis . Ça aurait dû être online et pas sur [...] [...] est toujours une triste nouvelle pour un journaliste, mais j’apprécie particulièrement le commentaire de Jeff Jarvis . Ça aurait dû être online et pas sur [...]

]]> By: rajendran sambandam http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359218 rajendran sambandam Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:58:18 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359218 hi the cuny link doesnt work for me i would be happy to get another link for it thanks hi
the cuny link doesnt work for me
i would be happy to get another link for it
thanks

]]> By: Will Pollard http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359216 Will Pollard Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:29:03 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359216 Jeff, I followed the CUNY link but there is still no info on the conference Oct 10th that you otherwise assume is known when you mention it. Anyone else know a link? Will Jeff,

I followed the CUNY link but there is still no info on the conference Oct 10th that you otherwise assume is known when you mention it.

Anyone else know a link?

Will

]]> By: Get A New Browser » Blog Archive » RIP Business 2.0 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359212 Get A New Browser » Blog Archive » RIP Business 2.0 Wed, 05 Sep 2007 15:29:40 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/05/business-20-publishing-10-0/#comment-359212 [...] know who is to blame don’t you? The internet. Jarvis says it’s because the magazine was made by a “1.0 [...] [...] know who is to blame don’t you? The internet. Jarvis says it’s because the magazine was made by a “1.0 [...]

]]>