Comments on: Two laptops per child http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/ by Jeff Jarvis Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:43:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Wedding Photographers http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-366156 Wedding Photographers Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:20:04 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-366156 I wonder how long these laptops will last in the long run? I mean, with one major moving part.... I wonder how long these laptops will last in the long run? I mean, with one major moving part….

]]> By: peter http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-363992 peter Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:26:44 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-363992 Jeff - did you order? Or did you perhaps read Saturday's WSJ & think better of it? Jeff – did you order?

Or did you perhaps read Saturday’s WSJ & think better of it?

]]> By: Greg0658 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-360751 Greg0658 Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:00:21 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-360751 Below this statement is some info I retrieved from WIKI with its link. My question is unanswered, but I understand more. I'm abit abashed for implying its a get rich scheme. Some day I pray balance & equality will abound. But in this age I'm greatfull that legions of consumers enable corporations to be philanthropic. WIKIpedia The project originally aimed for a price of 100 United States dollars. In May 2006, Negroponte told the Red Hat's annual user summit: It is a floating price. We are a nonprofit organization. We have a target of $100 by 2008, but probably it will be $135, maybe $140. That is a start price, but what we have to do is with every release make it cheaper and cheaper we are promising that the price will go down. OLPC is funded by a number of sponsor organizations, including AMD, Brightstar Corporation, eBay, Google, Marvell, News Corporation, SES, Nortel Networks, Red Hat, and most recently Intel. Each company has donated two million dollars. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XO-1_%28laptop%29 Below this statement is some info I retrieved from WIKI with its link. My question is unanswered, but I understand more. I’m abit abashed for implying its a get rich scheme. Some day I pray balance & equality will abound. But in this age I’m greatfull that legions of consumers enable corporations to be philanthropic.

WIKIpedia
The project originally aimed for a price of 100 United States dollars. In May 2006, Negroponte told the Red Hat’s annual user summit: It is a floating price. We are a nonprofit organization. We have a target of $100 by 2008, but probably it will be $135, maybe $140. That is a start price, but what we have to do is with every release make it cheaper and cheaper we are promising that the price will go down.

OLPC is funded by a number of sponsor organizations, including AMD, Brightstar Corporation, eBay, Google, Marvell, News Corporation, SES, Nortel Networks, Red Hat, and most recently Intel. Each company has donated two million dollars.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XO-1_%28laptop%29

]]> By: Greg0658 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-360680 Greg0658 Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:53:39 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-360680 Jeff - for Tom and me do you have a concept of the extraction of wealth for the green machine company and execs and investors? break even at the current price point at say 100K units? or where? Jeff – for Tom and me

do you have a concept of the extraction of wealth for the green machine company and execs and investors?

break even at the current price point at say 100K units? or where?

]]> By: ME http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-360676 ME Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:53:32 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-360676 “It’s naive to believe that any person on this planet doesn’t want the latest, greatest, most stylish, most popular gadget available.” Yeah, you are so wrong, it's not even funny. Have you ever been outside the US? You sound like you have lived your life in a suburban american bubble... “It’s naive to believe that any person on this planet doesn’t want the latest, greatest, most stylish, most popular gadget available.”

Yeah, you are so wrong, it’s not even funny. Have you ever been outside the US? You sound like you have lived your life in a suburban american bubble…

]]> By: Nick Dabloguiman http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-360645 Nick Dabloguiman Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:38:38 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-360645 "It’s naive to believe that any person on this planet doesn’t want the latest, greatest, most stylish, most popular gadget available." I cannot disagree more with you. I can show you more than a hundred places in the Andes where kids could not care less whether it is 2nd- or 5th-rate technology as long as they can learn how to read, write and interact creatively with the rest of the world. “It’s naive to believe that any person on this planet doesn’t want the latest, greatest, most stylish, most popular gadget available.”

I cannot disagree more with you. I can show you more than a hundred places in the Andes where kids could not care less whether it is 2nd- or 5th-rate technology as long as they can learn how to read, write and interact creatively with the rest of the world.

]]> By: Jonny Goldstein http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-360627 Jonny Goldstein Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:31:57 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-360627 I think the fact that these have been designed with kids specifically in mind gives them an edge. Also, it's great that they have been created using open source operating system and software. Keeps them out of Microsoft's clutches and lets them get in and tinker. If nothing else, this will spur other computer makers to start cranking out low cost computers for the 5/6 of the world that doesn't have them. I think the fact that these have been designed with kids specifically in mind gives them an edge. Also, it’s great that they have been created using open source operating system and software. Keeps them out of Microsoft’s clutches and lets them get in and tinker. If nothing else, this will spur other computer makers to start cranking out low cost computers for the 5/6 of the world that doesn’t have them.

]]> By: Tom Pimental http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-360626 Tom Pimental Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:31:36 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-360626 How come the $100 laptop costs $200? How come the $100 laptop costs $200?

]]> By: Bill Koslosky, MD http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-360625 Bill Koslosky, MD Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:26:09 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/24/two-laptops-per-child-2/#comment-360625 Jeff: I think the intentions of Negroponte are well meaning, but these simplified laptops run the risk of being viewed as 2nd-rate technology. The Times article brings up this issue. It's naive to believe that any person on this planet doesn't want the latest, greatest, most stylish, most popular gadget available. It also could lend itself to the balkanization of technology by artificially defining a third world standard for needs and expectations. Believe me, I'm not working against this effort, I'm just raising a point that should be discussed. When I first heard about this project, I thought that a cell phone or small internet pad device would work better. It would solve the ubiquity problem. (I don't know if these green laptops will run on WiMax networks.) There would have to be some negotiation with the carriers in these countries. Jeff:

I think the intentions of Negroponte are well meaning, but these simplified laptops run the risk of being viewed as 2nd-rate technology. The Times article brings up this issue. It’s naive to believe that any person on this planet doesn’t want the latest, greatest, most stylish, most popular gadget available. It also could lend itself to the balkanization of technology by artificially defining a third world standard for needs and expectations.

Believe me, I’m not working against this effort, I’m just raising a point that should be discussed.

When I first heard about this project, I thought that a cell phone or small internet pad device would work better. It would solve the ubiquity problem. (I don’t know if these green laptops will run on WiMax networks.) There would have to be some negotiation with the carriers in these countries.

]]>