Comments on: Post-media journalism

By: Niet de macht van het medium maar de kracht van het verhaal |

Niet de macht van het medium maar de kracht van het verhaal | — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:09:00 +0000

[...] betekent niet dat journalisten overbodig worden. Ook experts verdwijnen niet. Maar post-media-journalisten moeten begrijpen dat ze het niet meer moeten hebben van de macht van hun medium, maar van de kracht [...]

By: MediaBlog » Niet de Macht van het Medium maar de Kracht van het Verhaal

MediaBlog » Niet de Macht van het Medium maar de Kracht van het Verhaal — Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:02:41 +0000

By: Journalism Daily - Today’s Top Blog Posts on Journalism - Powered by SocialRank

Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:05:33 +0000

[...] Post-media journalism [...]

By: Dear Mr. Winer: « Network(ed)News

Dear Mr. Winer: « Network(ed)News — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:48:36 +0000

[...] think Mr. Jarvis likes this general idea of maps, which I’ve been publicly and privately writing about for upwards [...]

By: Beta Alfa » BloggosfÃ¤ren krymper — postbloggosfÃ¤ren

Beta Alfa » BloggosfÃ¤ren krymper — postbloggosfÃ¤ren — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:47:51 +0000

[...] Jeff Jarvis skrev igÃ¥r om post-media-journalistik. Vi Ã¤r i en tid dÃ¥ mediet i sig inte spelar roll. Det Ã¤r konversationen som Ã¤r det viktiga. [...]

By: MediaBlog » Journalistiek in het post-media tijdperk

MediaBlog » Journalistiek in het post-media tijdperk — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:18:40 +0000

[...] term las ik bij Jeff Jarvis: It beats social-media for what follows in news is more than media and more than social. We donâ€™t [...]

By: MÃ¡rio

MÃ¡rio — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:17:03 +0000

The medium is no more the message

By: Charlie Beckett

Charlie Beckett — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:55:49 +0000

I don’t think you can be ‘post-media’. I am not sure you can be post-journalism either. That’s like being ‘post-economic’ or ‘post society’. Mainstream mass journalism was a type of media and now its changing. I think ‘Networked Journalism’ is a label for ‘post-mainstream mass news media’ that covers most bases. But people have always communicated about topical issues and events outside of the professional news media. The difference now is that ‘citizen media’ is being enpowered and blossoms in to new forms.

By: Ydobon

Ydobon — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:46:59 +0000

“Journalism” was perfect but is now perfectly debased.

Neo-journalism? “New” journalism in name but really journalism as it should have been all along, plus the frisson of fear from the partial connection to neo-conservative.

What is a web log but a journal in it’s original, purest form?

By: Caplan

Caplan — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:37:34 +0000

Herbert Marshall McLuhan long ago exposed the charade of ‘media-journalism’ in his most popular work– “Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man” (1964).

McLuhan would have well understood current flaps over TV news-anchors Dan Rather & Katie Couric; they are not journalists, but media performers. Their alleged news-content/journalism is trivial compared to the impact of the huge media stage (..circus ?) they use to communicate with the masses. The internet medium is much less fertile to celebrity performers & pretenders.

MSM “news-content” is unimportant… and usually non-existent.

The medium is the message.

By: Steve Boriss

Steve Boriss — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:23:47 +0000

Actually, I would prefer the term “post-journalism media,” given how much of the journalism dogma of the past century has been found to be untrue, unwanted by news consumers, and unable to survive in a newly competitive environment, e.g. objectivity, the discipline of verification, the public’s right to know, and the limited ability of journalists to deliver real truth given their limited resources. (Steve Boriss, The Future of News)