<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox fights free speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tansley - addendum</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362380</link>
		<dc:creator>Tansley - addendum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362380</guid>
		<description>Hi, Nut...miss me?  

Um...this is just really totally predictable, Jeff.  In fact, I seriously doubt Citizen Murdoch had anything to do with the ruckus in question.

Networks are like large, semi-sentient colonial organisms...they graze placidly but if they recognize anything that even HINTS of piracy, they go ballistic...often for the most idiotic of reasons.

All McCain has to do is place a personal call to Rupert and this will most likely all go bye-bye...with the requisite reprimands issued to overzealous flunkies, of course...

In the meantime, for anybody to take ANYTHING Fox has to say prima facie is nearly as dumb as the furor Fox has stirred up in the name of copyrights, here.  Too bad O'Reilly didn't get hold of this sooner so he could stuff one of his wingtips in his gob over it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Nut&#8230;miss me?  </p>
<p>Um&#8230;this is just really totally predictable, Jeff.  In fact, I seriously doubt Citizen Murdoch had anything to do with the ruckus in question.</p>
<p>Networks are like large, semi-sentient colonial organisms&#8230;they graze placidly but if they recognize anything that even HINTS of piracy, they go ballistic&#8230;often for the most idiotic of reasons.</p>
<p>All McCain has to do is place a personal call to Rupert and this will most likely all go bye-bye&#8230;with the requisite reprimands issued to overzealous flunkies, of course&#8230;</p>
<p>In the meantime, for anybody to take ANYTHING Fox has to say prima facie is nearly as dumb as the furor Fox has stirred up in the name of copyrights, here.  Too bad O&#8217;Reilly didn&#8217;t get hold of this sooner so he could stuff one of his wingtips in his gob over it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptiousNut</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362346</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptiousNut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362346</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

How many times have you complained about the FCC, Howard Stern's woes, and other censoring of profane speech?

Add them up and compare, or should I say 'contrast' it to the paucity of your token complaints against McCain-Feingold (and other suppressions of political speech).

When the ratio is inverted I will find another note to sing.  Meanwhile I will occasionally do you the favor of adding much needed 'diversity' to your blog threads.  Where did all the fun commenters go anyway?  The stooges you've attracted these days are boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>How many times have you complained about the FCC, Howard Stern&#8217;s woes, and other censoring of profane speech?</p>
<p>Add them up and compare, or should I say &#8216;contrast&#8217; it to the paucity of your token complaints against McCain-Feingold (and other suppressions of political speech).</p>
<p>When the ratio is inverted I will find another note to sing.  Meanwhile I will occasionally do you the favor of adding much needed &#8216;diversity&#8217; to your blog threads.  Where did all the fun commenters go anyway?  The stooges you&#8217;ve attracted these days are boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362334</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362334</guid>
		<description>Nut,
Would you please take a memory course? I long ago questioned McCain Feingold. Find another note to sing, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nut,<br />
Would you please take a memory course? I long ago questioned McCain Feingold. Find another note to sing, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptiousNut</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362333</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptiousNut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362333</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

You are against this First Amendment "abuse" but not against McCain-Feingold?  I

It's ironic and ridiculous all at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>You are against this First Amendment &#8220;abuse&#8221; but not against McCain-Feingold?  I</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ironic and ridiculous all at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lukasiewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362287</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lukasiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362287</guid>
		<description>NBC News and MSNBC have a debate usage policy posted at www.debatepolicy.msnbc.com.   Check it out.  The policy would allow this kind of use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC News and MSNBC have a debate usage policy posted at <a href="http://www.debatepolicy.msnbc.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.debatepolicy.msnbc.com</a>.   Check it out.  The policy would allow this kind of use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Terenzio</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362257</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Terenzio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362257</guid>
		<description>Outrageous.

I can't help, however, to think there is a cynical crack in there somewhere about the reality of our two party spectrum being about as diverse and intelligent as network TV. ; }</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outrageous.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help, however, to think there is a cynical crack in there somewhere about the reality of our two party spectrum being about as diverse and intelligent as network TV. ; }</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorian</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362252</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362252</guid>
		<description>Video now says "no longer available."  Hmmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Video now says &#8220;no longer available.&#8221;  Hmmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362251</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362251</guid>
		<description>Why on earth would it be to Fox News's disadvantage to have their logo shown?  It's publicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why on earth would it be to Fox News&#8217;s disadvantage to have their logo shown?  It&#8217;s publicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg0658</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362241</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg0658</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362241</guid>
		<description>I agree Eric, a USA Presidential debate is public domain, I don't care who paid for the hall.

The Fox logo should be blanked out tho. You know when video docu is walking the street doing a shot and t-shirts have to be blurred out, same thing.

Is this a 1st for footage used and threat of legal action from Fox? Do they (News Corp or the Queens territories) have a stake in Woodstock or the museum?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Eric, a USA Presidential debate is public domain, I don&#8217;t care who paid for the hall.</p>
<p>The Fox logo should be blanked out tho. You know when video docu is walking the street doing a shot and t-shirts have to be blurred out, same thing.</p>
<p>Is this a 1st for footage used and threat of legal action from Fox? Do they (News Corp or the Queens territories) have a stake in Woodstock or the museum?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Jaffa</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362239</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Jaffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362239</guid>
		<description>My point is that people making commercial documentaries (as well as campaign commercials) should be free to use debate footage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is that people making commercial documentaries (as well as campaign commercials) should be free to use debate footage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Jaffa</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362238</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Jaffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/26/fox-fights-free-speech/#comment-362238</guid>
		<description>RE "But one way to solve this is for all the candidates to pledge that they will not appear on any networkâ€™s debate unless that network frees the footage for all candidates and citizens."

The candidates should require "permission for anyone to make any commercial or non-commercial use of a debate video" before agreeing to a debate on that network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE &#8220;But one way to solve this is for all the candidates to pledge that they will not appear on any networkâ€™s debate unless that network frees the footage for all candidates and citizens.&#8221;</p>
<p>The candidates should require &#8220;permission for anyone to make any commercial or non-commercial use of a debate video&#8221; before agreeing to a debate on that network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
