<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social value</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 09:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Delia</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362588</link>
		<dc:creator>Delia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 03:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362588</guid>
		<description>Matt: just to make sure I understand you correctly, are you saying you would consent to ANY use of your private info -- it would be no big deal for you, *however* they chose to use it... you don't even care to know... (as long as the site was free)? D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt: just to make sure I understand you correctly, are you saying you would consent to ANY use of your private info &#8212; it would be no big deal for you, *however* they chose to use it&#8230; you don&#8217;t even care to know&#8230; (as long as the site was free)? D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt T</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362577</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362577</guid>
		<description>Delia, 

Honestly, no, I did not read any of the "fine print" when I joined Facebook.  Just like I did not read the fine print when I signed up with Blogger, Gmail, Flickr, or anyone else who does not take my money.  It's just not that big of a deal to me and a risk I am willing to take.  Apparently you are not, and that's fine.  That's what freedom of choice and competition is about.  

--Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delia, </p>
<p>Honestly, no, I did not read any of the &#8220;fine print&#8221; when I joined Facebook.  Just like I did not read the fine print when I signed up with Blogger, Gmail, Flickr, or anyone else who does not take my money.  It&#8217;s just not that big of a deal to me and a risk I am willing to take.  Apparently you are not, and that&#8217;s fine.  That&#8217;s what freedom of choice and competition is about.  </p>
<p>&#8211;Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katzenbach.info &#187; Facebook und der Wert eines Nutzers</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362477</link>
		<dc:creator>katzenbach.info &#187; Facebook und der Wert eines Nutzers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362477</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine findet 15 Mrd. doch nicht so teuer. Zumindest im Vergleich mit Zeitungen. Laut Analysten sei ein Zeitungsleser 964$ (2004) bzw. 500$ (heute) pro Jahr wert. Die Facebook-Bewertung lÃ¤uft bei 50 Mio. Nutzern auf 300$ pro Nutzer raus. Und das - so Jeff Jarvis - obwohl Nutzer nur 41 Minuten pro Monat auf Nachrichten-Websites, aber 30 Minuten tÃ¤glich auf Facebook. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine findet 15 Mrd. doch nicht so teuer. Zumindest im Vergleich mit Zeitungen. Laut Analysten sei ein Zeitungsleser 964$ (2004) bzw. 500$ (heute) pro Jahr wert. Die Facebook-Bewertung lÃ¤uft bei 50 Mio. Nutzern auf 300$ pro Nutzer raus. Und das - so Jeff Jarvis - obwohl Nutzer nur 41 Minuten pro Monat auf Nachrichten-Websites, aber 30 Minuten tÃ¤glich auf Facebook. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delia</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362387</link>
		<dc:creator>Delia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362387</guid>
		<description>Matt,

I'm just curious if you read the "fine print" when you joined Facebook and were aware what were the limits (if *any*...) of Facebook using the private info you presumably gave them for the purpose of using Facebook...   

Delia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just curious if you read the &#8220;fine print&#8221; when you joined Facebook and were aware what were the limits (if *any*&#8230;) of Facebook using the private info you presumably gave them for the purpose of using Facebook&#8230;   </p>
<p>Delia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt T</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362383</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362383</guid>
		<description>Geez, everyone freaking out over targeted advertising using information that you knowingly gave to a website?  I'm not totally up to speed on the whole "targeting outside Facebook" thing, but based on my personal experience (of about four years on Facebook) has not shown any increase in spam or any other unsavory side effects of their marketing strategies.  
And that $300 per user per year is probably not far off, considering that is less than $1 work of marketing value per day.  Their in-line news feed advertising even gets by those of us who surf with javascript disabled to get around most online ads.  
Great site, Jeff.  Other than your support of Mrs Clinton, of course.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, everyone freaking out over targeted advertising using information that you knowingly gave to a website?  I&#8217;m not totally up to speed on the whole &#8220;targeting outside Facebook&#8221; thing, but based on my personal experience (of about four years on Facebook) has not shown any increase in spam or any other unsavory side effects of their marketing strategies.<br />
And that $300 per user per year is probably not far off, considering that is less than $1 work of marketing value per day.  Their in-line news feed advertising even gets by those of us who surf with javascript disabled to get around most online ads.<br />
Great site, Jeff.  Other than your support of Mrs Clinton, of course.  <img src='http://www.buzzmachine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seni Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362367</link>
		<dc:creator>Seni Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362367</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

What is the methodology behind the number?  I have to totally disagree with you on this point.

There is a good post here on the over valuation: 

http://senithomas.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/facebooks-over-valuation-the-20-farce/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>What is the methodology behind the number?  I have to totally disagree with you on this point.</p>
<p>There is a good post here on the over valuation: </p>
<p><a href="http://senithomas.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/facebooks-over-valuation-the-20-farce/" rel="nofollow">http://senithomas.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/facebooks-over-valuation-the-20-farce/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bwl zwei null &#187; Facebook, Microsoft und der Deal des Jahres</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362355</link>
		<dc:creator>bwl zwei null &#187; Facebook, Microsoft und der Deal des Jahres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362355</guid>
		<description>[...] gibt sich Jeff Jarvis und Ã¼bernimmt dazu die Argumentation von Paul Ginocchio, einem Analysten der Deutschen Bank, der [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gibt sich Jeff Jarvis und Ã¼bernimmt dazu die Argumentation von Paul Ginocchio, einem Analysten der Deutschen Bank, der [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerd Kamp</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362351</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerd Kamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 06:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362351</guid>
		<description>Slight typo: The referenced article gives a valuation of $962 not $964</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slight typo: The referenced article gives a valuation of $962 not $964</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Heaton</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362332</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Heaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362332</guid>
		<description>Jeff, I can't believe this is coming from you. Targeting based on observed behavior is one thing, but targeting outside Facebook based on private profile information is surely unethical. Follow the dots, man. Where do you draw the line?

My clients are building their own networks with the intent to create local ad networks, the data from which will be used to target based on observed behavior. If they were to build local social networks and later use that information to target people along the network, I'd feel very ashamed of myself for creating such a monster.

Again, where do you draw the line? Because what you're advocating is an utter lack of privacy as regards the Web. Follow the dots. Do you honestly want Madison Avenue or the government watching your every move with an instrument that carries not only your personal identity, but your gender, where you live, your martial and political status, sexual preference, age, where you work, where you went to school, the people you hang out with, the groups you belong to, and so forth?

I strongly suggest you rethink your position.

Terry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, I can&#8217;t believe this is coming from you. Targeting based on observed behavior is one thing, but targeting outside Facebook based on private profile information is surely unethical. Follow the dots, man. Where do you draw the line?</p>
<p>My clients are building their own networks with the intent to create local ad networks, the data from which will be used to target based on observed behavior. If they were to build local social networks and later use that information to target people along the network, I&#8217;d feel very ashamed of myself for creating such a monster.</p>
<p>Again, where do you draw the line? Because what you&#8217;re advocating is an utter lack of privacy as regards the Web. Follow the dots. Do you honestly want Madison Avenue or the government watching your every move with an instrument that carries not only your personal identity, but your gender, where you live, your martial and political status, sexual preference, age, where you work, where you went to school, the people you hang out with, the groups you belong to, and so forth?</p>
<p>I strongly suggest you rethink your position.</p>
<p>Terry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Kay</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362319</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 05:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362319</guid>
		<description>I think the analyst is wrong.  After all, with Facebook's current business, they're able to make their users be worth a 1/100th each year of what MS is paying.  I posted that &lt;a href="http://www.centristcoalition.com/blog/archives/003979.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;I think the deal is mostly to  keep Goog out&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the analyst is wrong.  After all, with Facebook&#8217;s current business, they&#8217;re able to make their users be worth a 1/100th each year of what MS is paying.  I posted that <a href="http://www.centristcoalition.com/blog/archives/003979.html" rel="nofollow">I think the deal is mostly to  keep Goog out</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delia</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362315</link>
		<dc:creator>Delia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362315</guid>
		<description>Jeff, 

re:"Every single website targets"

interesting statement... does craigslist target?

Delia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, </p>
<p>re:&#8221;Every single website targets&#8221;</p>
<p>interesting statement&#8230; does craigslist target?</p>
<p>Delia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delia</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362314</link>
		<dc:creator>Delia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362314</guid>
		<description>re:"When Facebook uses the private information I give them in a play to target me when Iâ€™m away from Facebook, thatâ€™s a direction I donâ€™t wish to be a part of."

I think you are right, Terry... and I doubt people knowingly consented to Facebook basically using people's private information against *themselves* -- you'd think at some point they are going to feel they got tricked and just walk away...

Delia

P.S. I think a non-profit competitor to Facebook that would safeguard people's private information instead of abusing it would eventually put Facebook out of business... (just like a non-profit competitor to craigslist that would use the profits that have reached ridiculous levels on customer service and improvements instead of ending up in the shareholders' pockets would probably make craigslist irrelevant in time) D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re:&#8221;When Facebook uses the private information I give them in a play to target me when Iâ€™m away from Facebook, thatâ€™s a direction I donâ€™t wish to be a part of.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you are right, Terry&#8230; and I doubt people knowingly consented to Facebook basically using people&#8217;s private information against *themselves* &#8212; you&#8217;d think at some point they are going to feel they got tricked and just walk away&#8230;</p>
<p>Delia</p>
<p>P.S. I think a non-profit competitor to Facebook that would safeguard people&#8217;s private information instead of abusing it would eventually put Facebook out of business&#8230; (just like a non-profit competitor to craigslist that would use the profits that have reached ridiculous levels on customer service and improvements instead of ending up in the shareholders&#8217; pockets would probably make craigslist irrelevant in time) D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PXLated</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362311</link>
		<dc:creator>PXLated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 02:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362311</guid>
		<description>Sorry Jeff, it still sounds crazy. The newspaper figures are probably based on historical data whereas the Facebook figure is just a hope at this point. Whether they can monetize it and to what effect is yet to be determined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Jeff, it still sounds crazy. The newspaper figures are probably based on historical data whereas the Facebook figure is just a hope at this point. Whether they can monetize it and to what effect is yet to be determined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt W</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362309</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 01:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362309</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff,

Love your blog!

Just one quick thing, I think the link you have in there is wrong, it points to a story about the LA Times launching a people finder.  I think you wanted to link here:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003662798

Keep up the excellent work.

-Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff,</p>
<p>Love your blog!</p>
<p>Just one quick thing, I think the link you have in there is wrong, it points to a story about the LA Times launching a people finder.  I think you wanted to link here:<br />
<a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003662798" rel="nofollow">http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003662798</a></p>
<p>Keep up the excellent work.</p>
<p>-Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beta Alfa &#187; Jarvis ger perspektiv pÃ¥ Facebooks prislapp</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362306</link>
		<dc:creator>Beta Alfa &#187; Jarvis ger perspektiv pÃ¥ Facebooks prislapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362306</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis: Social value [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis: Social value [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362304</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362304</guid>
		<description>Terry,
Every single website targets. And in many cases, targeting is helpful - or at least marginally less irrelevant and irritating. How do you think the people you consult for will pay for their work? More efficient -- thus targeted -- advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry,<br />
Every single website targets. And in many cases, targeting is helpful - or at least marginally less irrelevant and irritating. How do you think the people you consult for will pay for their work? More efficient &#8212; thus targeted &#8212; advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Heaton</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362302</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Heaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/10/27/social-value/#comment-362302</guid>
		<description>This is one of the few things I completely disagree with you about, Jeff. When Facebook uses the private information I give them in a play to target me when I'm away from Facebook, that's a direction I don't wish to be a part of. The love affair with Facebook's hype is about to come crashing down in a sinister form of greed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the few things I completely disagree with you about, Jeff. When Facebook uses the private information I give them in a play to target me when I&#8217;m away from Facebook, that&#8217;s a direction I don&#8217;t wish to be a part of. The love affair with Facebook&#8217;s hype is about to come crashing down in a sinister form of greed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
