<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glam for Geeks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/11/13/glam-for-geeks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/11/13/glam-for-geeks/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Musings &#38; Meanderings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; User Definitions</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/11/13/glam-for-geeks/#comment-363675</link>
		<dc:creator>Musings &#38; Meanderings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; User Definitions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 04:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/11/13/glam-for-geeks/#comment-363675</guid>
		<description>[...] conversation about Glam, on Michael Arrington&#8217;s and Jeff Jarvis&#8217;s blogs (here and here), got me thinking about this again, and realizing just how overly broad the definitions of our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] conversation about Glam, on Michael Arrington&#8217;s and Jeff Jarvis&#8217;s blogs (here and here), got me thinking about this again, and realizing just how overly broad the definitions of our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Build the Echo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-11-17</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/11/13/glam-for-geeks/#comment-363402</link>
		<dc:creator>Build the Echo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-11-17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/11/13/glam-for-geeks/#comment-363402</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» Glam for Geeks (tags: buildtheecho business_models social_network)     Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» Glam for Geeks (tags: buildtheecho business_models social_network)     Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/11/13/glam-for-geeks/#comment-363326</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/11/13/glam-for-geeks/#comment-363326</guid>
		<description>&quot;Michael Arrington argues that Glam is, in essence, cheating by calling itself the largest womenâ€™s site when itâ€™s really not a site but a network.&quot;

Well no one complains when Google is categorized as a Search company when really it&#039;s an Advertising company......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Michael Arrington argues that Glam is, in essence, cheating by calling itself the largest womenâ€™s site when itâ€™s really not a site but a network.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well no one complains when Google is categorized as a Search company when really it&#8217;s an Advertising company&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lark Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/11/13/glam-for-geeks/#comment-363226</link>
		<dc:creator>Lark Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/11/13/glam-for-geeks/#comment-363226</guid>
		<description>iVillage: $100MM in revenue and profitable

Glam: $20MM and loses money

QED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iVillage: $100MM in revenue and profitable</p>
<p>Glam: $20MM and loses money</p>
<p>QED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glam Media launches new platform &#124; Startup Addict Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/11/13/glam-for-geeks/#comment-363216</link>
		<dc:creator>Glam Media launches new platform &#124; Startup Addict Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/11/13/glam-for-geeks/#comment-363216</guid>
		<description>[...] and Buzzmachine have some great fodder on this topic as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Buzzmachine have some great fodder on this topic as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

