<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DLD: Wales v. Calacanis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: .::.Crea tus Blogs.::. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Lo quieren los clientes&#8221;: Nielsen se propone medir la audiencia online de los shows de televisión</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-375436</link>
		<dc:creator>.::.Crea tus Blogs.::. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Lo quieren los clientes&#8221;: Nielsen se propone medir la audiencia online de los shows de televisión</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 04:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-375436</guid>
		<description>[...] merece otro libro que él no va a escribir al escuchar palabras de otro megamogul de la red, Jason Calacanis. La frase bien vale una misa por lo que podría tener de certero: the fat tail will be human, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] merece otro libro que él no va a escribir al escuchar palabras de otro megamogul de la red, Jason Calacanis. La frase bien vale una misa por lo que podría tener de certero: the fat tail will be human, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikia Search, Mahalo and Google &#171; PlayerSearch Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-371609</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikia Search, Mahalo and Google &#171; PlayerSearch Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-371609</guid>
		<description>[...] (Wikia and Mahalo) vs. Algorithmic search (Google). Jeff Jarvis of Buzz Machine was live blogging here and the Long Tail blog covered it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Wikia and Mahalo) vs. Algorithmic search (Google). Jeff Jarvis of Buzz Machine was live blogging here and the Long Tail blog covered it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob zand &#187; Blog Archive &#187; quickly connecting two ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-370826</link>
		<dc:creator>rob zand &#187; Blog Archive &#187; quickly connecting two ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 08:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-370826</guid>
		<description>[...] Jimmy Wales (Wikia) and Jason Calacanis (Mahalo), with Marissa Meyer (Google) discussing human-driven search (Mahalo and Wikia) vs. algorithmic search (Google). &#8220;Esther Dyson says the problem with their model is the long tail. If she were starting a company sheâ€™d do something else. â€œOk, Iâ€™m going to kill myself now,â€ laughed [Calacanis] He says that the fat tail will be human, the medium tail social, the long tail algorithmic. And he says that the ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jimmy Wales (Wikia) and Jason Calacanis (Mahalo), with Marissa Meyer (Google) discussing human-driven search (Mahalo and Wikia) vs. algorithmic search (Google). &#8220;Esther Dyson says the problem with their model is the long tail. If she were starting a company sheâ€™d do something else. â€œOk, Iâ€™m going to kill myself now,â€ laughed [Calacanis] He says that the fat tail will be human, the medium tail social, the long tail algorithmic. And he says that the &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Searching for video online &#171; Gordon Mattey&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-369514</link>
		<dc:creator>Searching for video online &#171; Gordon Mattey&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-369514</guid>
		<description>[...] for video&#160;online  Interesting discussion out of a panel at the Digital, Life, Design conference from Munich a month ago. Mahalo, Wikia, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for video&nbsp;online  Interesting discussion out of a panel at the Digital, Life, Design conference from Munich a month ago. Mahalo, Wikia, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rainer Blome</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367475</link>
		<dc:creator>Rainer Blome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367475</guid>
		<description>&gt; Jason says he doesnâ€™t think Jimmy will be unsuccessful

Is this correct?  Shouldn&#039;t this be &quot;doesn&#039;t think Jimmy will be successful&quot;?  An important difference in this case.  And what would success mean, slowing the train, or being run over by it (:-)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Jason says he doesnâ€™t think Jimmy will be unsuccessful</p>
<p>Is this correct?  Shouldn&#8217;t this be &#8220;doesn&#8217;t think Jimmy will be successful&#8221;?  An important difference in this case.  And what would success mean, slowing the train, or being run over by it (:-)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The short head is human, middle fat is social and long tail is algorithmic &#171; MPL&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367436</link>
		<dc:creator>The short head is human, middle fat is social and long tail is algorithmic &#171; MPL&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367436</guid>
		<description>[...] It is an interesting way to think about it.Â  Of course, it is all ad-supported and it does make a good case for Mahalo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is an interesting way to think about it.Â  Of course, it is all ad-supported and it does make a good case for Mahalo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edelman: Wikipedia vertrauenswÃ¼rdiger als klassische Medien at viralmythen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367433</link>
		<dc:creator>Edelman: Wikipedia vertrauenswÃ¼rdiger als klassische Medien at viralmythen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367433</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis, der die ganze Diskussion gewissenhaft mitgeschrieben hat, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis, der die ganze Diskussion gewissenhaft mitgeschrieben hat, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edelman: Wikipedia vertrauenswÃ¼rdiger als klassische Medien at viralmythen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367434</link>
		<dc:creator>Edelman: Wikipedia vertrauenswÃ¼rdiger als klassische Medien at viralmythen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367434</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis, der die ganze Diskussion gewissenhaft mitgeschrieben hat, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis, der die ganze Diskussion gewissenhaft mitgeschrieben hat, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShinyRed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital, Life, Design - a smÃ¶rgÃ¥sbord of soundbites</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367379</link>
		<dc:creator>ShinyRed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital, Life, Design - a smÃ¶rgÃ¥sbord of soundbites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367379</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason CalcanisÂ squares off against Jimmy WalesÂ in a discussion around human vs. algorithmic search. Jeff Jarvis&#8217; post picks out a juicy Calcanis quote: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason CalcanisÂ squares off against Jimmy WalesÂ in a discussion around human vs. algorithmic search. Jeff Jarvis&#8217; post picks out a juicy Calcanis quote: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MediaBlog &#187; &#8220;The fat tail will be human, the medium tail social, the long tail algorithmic&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367367</link>
		<dc:creator>MediaBlog &#187; &#8220;The fat tail will be human, the medium tail social, the long tail algorithmic&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367367</guid>
		<description>[...] de post van Anderson grijpt weer terug op een verslag van blogger Jeff Jarvis]  Stem of voeg toe aan  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de post van Anderson grijpt weer terug op een verslag van blogger Jeff Jarvis]  Stem of voeg toe aan  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367360</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367360</guid>
		<description>Awesome break-down of the panel. Thanks Jeff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome break-down of the panel. Thanks Jeff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367349</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367349</guid>
		<description>@Matt - I think he means &quot;head,&quot; not fat tail, which doesn&#039;t really make sense unless he&#039;s referring to the larger part of the tail in a typical Pareto or Zipf distribution curve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt &#8211; I think he means &#8220;head,&#8221; not fat tail, which doesn&#8217;t really make sense unless he&#8217;s referring to the larger part of the tail in a typical Pareto or Zipf distribution curve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoniaC</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367347</link>
		<dc:creator>SoniaC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367347</guid>
		<description>Nice coverage...Hybrids appear to be a safe passage in light of the dissatisfaction.  Sorry - don&#039;t have the actual stat but have heard it more than once.  Local search in particular suffers from poor experience which is a key driver to directories rushing to get &quot;human&quot; generated content in the form of reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice coverage&#8230;Hybrids appear to be a safe passage in light of the dissatisfaction.  Sorry &#8211; don&#8217;t have the actual stat but have heard it more than once.  Local search in particular suffers from poor experience which is a key driver to directories rushing to get &#8220;human&#8221; generated content in the form of reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt schulte</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367336</link>
		<dc:creator>matt schulte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367336</guid>
		<description>what&#039;s a short sweet definition of the &quot;fat tail&quot; in the context of this discussion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s a short sweet definition of the &#8220;fat tail&#8221; in the context of this discussion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Buckley</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367332</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367332</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure the same stats Jason is offering apply to lots of things (Windows OS comes to mind). LOTS of people are ok with &quot;good enough&quot; even if they say it ain&#039;t so in a survey. So much so that huge brands are made on &quot;good enough&quot;.

What matters is how consumers actually behave and consume. Not so much how they answer a survey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure the same stats Jason is offering apply to lots of things (Windows OS comes to mind). LOTS of people are ok with &#8220;good enough&#8221; even if they say it ain&#8217;t so in a survey. So much so that huge brands are made on &#8220;good enough&#8221;.</p>
<p>What matters is how consumers actually behave and consume. Not so much how they answer a survey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertdfeinman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367323</link>
		<dc:creator>robertdfeinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367323</guid>
		<description>Information retrieval is complex. The big three do a fairly good job on the straightforward types of searches that are most common, that is: people, products and events. If they didn&#039;t people wouldn&#039;t be using their services and they wouldn&#039;t be attracting advertisers.

Specialized searches (say for scholarly research) are not going to be moneymakers and this could be a useful area for an open source or non-profit entity to tackle. One size does not fit all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Information retrieval is complex. The big three do a fairly good job on the straightforward types of searches that are most common, that is: people, products and events. If they didn&#8217;t people wouldn&#8217;t be using their services and they wouldn&#8217;t be attracting advertisers.</p>
<p>Specialized searches (say for scholarly research) are not going to be moneymakers and this could be a useful area for an open source or non-profit entity to tackle. One size does not fit all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367322</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367322</guid>
		<description>Mahalo is just SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mahalo is just SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
