<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DLD: Wales v. Calacanis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 11:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: .::.Crea tus Blogs.::. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Lo quieren los clientes&#8221;: Nielsen se propone medir la audiencia online de los shows de televisión</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-375436</link>
		<dc:creator>.::.Crea tus Blogs.::. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Lo quieren los clientes&#8221;: Nielsen se propone medir la audiencia online de los shows de televisión</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 04:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-375436</guid>
		<description>[...] merece otro libro que él no va a escribir al escuchar palabras de otro megamogul de la red, Jason Calacanis. La frase bien vale una misa por lo que podría tener de certero: the fat tail will be human, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] merece otro libro que él no va a escribir al escuchar palabras de otro megamogul de la red, Jason Calacanis. La frase bien vale una misa por lo que podría tener de certero: the fat tail will be human, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikia Search, Mahalo and Google &#171; PlayerSearch Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-371609</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikia Search, Mahalo and Google &#171; PlayerSearch Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-371609</guid>
		<description>[...] (Wikia and Mahalo) vs. Algorithmic search (Google). Jeff Jarvis of Buzz Machine was live blogging here and the Long Tail blog covered it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Wikia and Mahalo) vs. Algorithmic search (Google). Jeff Jarvis of Buzz Machine was live blogging here and the Long Tail blog covered it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob zand &#187; Blog Archive &#187; quickly connecting two ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-370826</link>
		<dc:creator>rob zand &#187; Blog Archive &#187; quickly connecting two ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 08:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-370826</guid>
		<description>[...] Jimmy Wales (Wikia) and Jason Calacanis (Mahalo), with Marissa Meyer (Google) discussing human-driven search (Mahalo and Wikia) vs. algorithmic search (Google). &#8220;Esther Dyson says the problem with their model is the long tail. If she were starting a company sheâ€™d do something else. â€œOk, Iâ€™m going to kill myself now,â€ laughed [Calacanis] He says that the fat tail will be human, the medium tail social, the long tail algorithmic. And he says that the ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jimmy Wales (Wikia) and Jason Calacanis (Mahalo), with Marissa Meyer (Google) discussing human-driven search (Mahalo and Wikia) vs. algorithmic search (Google). &#8220;Esther Dyson says the problem with their model is the long tail. If she were starting a company sheâ€™d do something else. â€œOk, Iâ€™m going to kill myself now,â€ laughed [Calacanis] He says that the fat tail will be human, the medium tail social, the long tail algorithmic. And he says that the &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Searching for video online &#171; Gordon Mattey&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-369514</link>
		<dc:creator>Searching for video online &#171; Gordon Mattey&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-369514</guid>
		<description>[...] for video&#160;online  Interesting discussion out of a panel at the Digital, Life, Design conference from Munich a month ago. Mahalo, Wikia, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for video&nbsp;online  Interesting discussion out of a panel at the Digital, Life, Design conference from Munich a month ago. Mahalo, Wikia, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rainer Blome</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367475</link>
		<dc:creator>Rainer Blome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367475</guid>
		<description>&#62; Jason says he doesnâ€™t think Jimmy will be unsuccessful

Is this correct?  Shouldn't this be "doesn't think Jimmy will be successful"?  An important difference in this case.  And what would success mean, slowing the train, or being run over by it (:-)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Jason says he doesnâ€™t think Jimmy will be unsuccessful</p>
<p>Is this correct?  Shouldn&#8217;t this be &#8220;doesn&#8217;t think Jimmy will be successful&#8221;?  An important difference in this case.  And what would success mean, slowing the train, or being run over by it (:-)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The short head is human, middle fat is social and long tail is algorithmic &#171; MPL&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367436</link>
		<dc:creator>The short head is human, middle fat is social and long tail is algorithmic &#171; MPL&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367436</guid>
		<description>[...] It is an interesting way to think about it.Â  Of course, it is all ad-supported and it does make a good case for Mahalo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is an interesting way to think about it.Â  Of course, it is all ad-supported and it does make a good case for Mahalo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edelman: Wikipedia vertrauenswÃ¼rdiger als klassische Medien at viralmythen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367433</link>
		<dc:creator>Edelman: Wikipedia vertrauenswÃ¼rdiger als klassische Medien at viralmythen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367433</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis, der die ganze Diskussion gewissenhaft mitgeschrieben hat, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis, der die ganze Diskussion gewissenhaft mitgeschrieben hat, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edelman: Wikipedia vertrauenswÃ¼rdiger als klassische Medien at viralmythen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367434</link>
		<dc:creator>Edelman: Wikipedia vertrauenswÃ¼rdiger als klassische Medien at viralmythen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367434</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis, der die ganze Diskussion gewissenhaft mitgeschrieben hat, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis, der die ganze Diskussion gewissenhaft mitgeschrieben hat, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShinyRed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital, Life, Design - a smÃ¶rgÃ¥sbord of soundbites</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367379</link>
		<dc:creator>ShinyRed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital, Life, Design - a smÃ¶rgÃ¥sbord of soundbites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367379</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason CalcanisÂ squares off against Jimmy WalesÂ in a discussion around human vs. algorithmic search. Jeff Jarvis&#8217; post picks out a juicy Calcanis quote: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason CalcanisÂ squares off against Jimmy WalesÂ in a discussion around human vs. algorithmic search. Jeff Jarvis&#8217; post picks out a juicy Calcanis quote: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MediaBlog &#187; &#8220;The fat tail will be human, the medium tail social, the long tail algorithmic&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367367</link>
		<dc:creator>MediaBlog &#187; &#8220;The fat tail will be human, the medium tail social, the long tail algorithmic&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367367</guid>
		<description>[...] de post van Anderson grijpt weer terug op een verslag van blogger Jeff Jarvis]  Stem of voeg toe aan  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de post van Anderson grijpt weer terug op een verslag van blogger Jeff Jarvis]  Stem of voeg toe aan  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367360</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367360</guid>
		<description>Awesome break-down of the panel. Thanks Jeff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome break-down of the panel. Thanks Jeff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367349</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367349</guid>
		<description>@Matt - I think he means "head," not fat tail, which doesn't really make sense unless he's referring to the larger part of the tail in a typical Pareto or Zipf distribution curve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt - I think he means &#8220;head,&#8221; not fat tail, which doesn&#8217;t really make sense unless he&#8217;s referring to the larger part of the tail in a typical Pareto or Zipf distribution curve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoniaC</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367347</link>
		<dc:creator>SoniaC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367347</guid>
		<description>Nice coverage...Hybrids appear to be a safe passage in light of the dissatisfaction.  Sorry - don't have the actual stat but have heard it more than once.  Local search in particular suffers from poor experience which is a key driver to directories rushing to get "human" generated content in the form of reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice coverage&#8230;Hybrids appear to be a safe passage in light of the dissatisfaction.  Sorry - don&#8217;t have the actual stat but have heard it more than once.  Local search in particular suffers from poor experience which is a key driver to directories rushing to get &#8220;human&#8221; generated content in the form of reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt schulte</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367336</link>
		<dc:creator>matt schulte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367336</guid>
		<description>what's a short sweet definition of the "fat tail" in the context of this discussion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s a short sweet definition of the &#8220;fat tail&#8221; in the context of this discussion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Buckley</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367332</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367332</guid>
		<description>I'm sure the same stats Jason is offering apply to lots of things (Windows OS comes to mind). LOTS of people are ok with "good enough" even if they say it ain't so in a survey. So much so that huge brands are made on "good enough".

What matters is how consumers actually behave and consume. Not so much how they answer a survey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure the same stats Jason is offering apply to lots of things (Windows OS comes to mind). LOTS of people are ok with &#8220;good enough&#8221; even if they say it ain&#8217;t so in a survey. So much so that huge brands are made on &#8220;good enough&#8221;.</p>
<p>What matters is how consumers actually behave and consume. Not so much how they answer a survey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertdfeinman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367323</link>
		<dc:creator>robertdfeinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367323</guid>
		<description>Information retrieval is complex. The big three do a fairly good job on the straightforward types of searches that are most common, that is: people, products and events. If they didn't people wouldn't be using their services and they wouldn't be attracting advertisers.

Specialized searches (say for scholarly research) are not going to be moneymakers and this could be a useful area for an open source or non-profit entity to tackle. One size does not fit all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Information retrieval is complex. The big three do a fairly good job on the straightforward types of searches that are most common, that is: people, products and events. If they didn&#8217;t people wouldn&#8217;t be using their services and they wouldn&#8217;t be attracting advertisers.</p>
<p>Specialized searches (say for scholarly research) are not going to be moneymakers and this could be a useful area for an open source or non-profit entity to tackle. One size does not fit all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367322</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/21/dld-wales-v-calacanis/#comment-367322</guid>
		<description>Mahalo is just SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mahalo is just SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
