<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Davos08: Condoleeza Rice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/23/davos08-condoleeza-rice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/23/davos08-condoleeza-rice/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lucasjosh.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Links for 1/30/08 [my NetNewsWire tabs]</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/23/davos08-condoleeza-rice/#comment-367921</link>
		<dc:creator>lucasjosh.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Links for 1/30/08 [my NetNewsWire tabs]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 05:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/23/davos08-condoleeza-rice/#comment-367921</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» Davos08: Condoleeza Rice [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» Davos08: Condoleeza Rice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Kirsch</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/23/davos08-condoleeza-rice/#comment-367699</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Kirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/23/davos08-condoleeza-rice/#comment-367699</guid>
		<description>Her comment just shows that future is still something we think about in a positive way. Which is a good thing, yet in her situation bringing up the illusion of supporting future and the associated terms of progress and (positive) change is a lame gesture as the US history shows, but then again she asks us not to look at history and I (begin to) wonder why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her comment just shows that future is still something we think about in a positive way. Which is a good thing, yet in her situation bringing up the illusion of supporting future and the associated terms of progress and (positive) change is a lame gesture as the US history shows, but then again she asks us not to look at history and I (begin to) wonder why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan foster</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/23/davos08-condoleeza-rice/#comment-367528</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/23/davos08-condoleeza-rice/#comment-367528</guid>
		<description>Politics aside for a moment (is that possible?) this is, in my opinion, a very healthy way to live.  Of course, this doesn&#039;t absolve you from seeking justice and forgiveness where appropriate but in my vocational area (pastoring/counseling) I find a lot of people locked in the past.  It&#039;s over.  Move on.  thanks for the post!  www.theproblemwithreligion.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics aside for a moment (is that possible?) this is, in my opinion, a very healthy way to live.  Of course, this doesn&#8217;t absolve you from seeking justice and forgiveness where appropriate but in my vocational area (pastoring/counseling) I find a lot of people locked in the past.  It&#8217;s over.  Move on.  thanks for the post!  <a href="http://www.theproblemwithreligion.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.theproblemwithreligion.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Stacy</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/23/davos08-condoleeza-rice/#comment-367495</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/23/davos08-condoleeza-rice/#comment-367495</guid>
		<description>Refusing to take responsibility for the past, only the future, is a favourite trick of politicians.  Its a neat one, because it means that they actually never have to take responsibility for anything they do, but it makes for a nice positive sound-bite.  Its Tony Blair&#039;s standard response when asked about Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Refusing to take responsibility for the past, only the future, is a favourite trick of politicians.  Its a neat one, because it means that they actually never have to take responsibility for anything they do, but it makes for a nice positive sound-bite.  Its Tony Blair&#8217;s standard response when asked about Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Pollard</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/23/davos08-condoleeza-rice/#comment-367474</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Pollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/23/davos08-condoleeza-rice/#comment-367474</guid>
		<description>No sense of history, just optimism. Excuse me, this comment is not another example of &quot;Anti=Americanism&quot; as you call it but are you sure about this? For example did George Bush and Tony Blair ever discuss bombing the offices of al Jazeera? The media seem less interesting at Davos than last year but this sort of thing may be in the background. Here in the UK the Official Secrets Act and the views of judges prevent the reporting of a trial and a report in the Daily Mirror as if they were a joined up story. Not so for media outside the UK, including the Jurist. Good for them, reporting current events in context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No sense of history, just optimism. Excuse me, this comment is not another example of &#8220;Anti=Americanism&#8221; as you call it but are you sure about this? For example did George Bush and Tony Blair ever discuss bombing the offices of al Jazeera? The media seem less interesting at Davos than last year but this sort of thing may be in the background. Here in the UK the Official Secrets Act and the views of judges prevent the reporting of a trial and a report in the Daily Mirror as if they were a joined up story. Not so for media outside the UK, including the Jurist. Good for them, reporting current events in context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/23/davos08-condoleeza-rice/#comment-367459</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/01/23/davos08-condoleeza-rice/#comment-367459</guid>
		<description>George Bush and seven of his administration&#039;s top officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, made at least 935 false statements in the two years following September 11, 2001, 
http://www.publicintegrity.org/WarCard/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Bush and seven of his administration&#8217;s top officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, made at least 935 false statements in the two years following September 11, 2001,<br />
<a href="http://www.publicintegrity.org/WarCard/" rel="nofollow">http://www.publicintegrity.org/WarCard/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

