<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ch-ch-ch-ch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/04/ch-ch-ch-ch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/04/ch-ch-ch-ch/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom O'Leary</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/04/ch-ch-ch-ch/#comment-368534</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Leary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/04/ch-ch-ch-ch/#comment-368534</guid>
		<description>That's really funny! Do you think anyone wants change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s really funny! Do you think anyone wants change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cooler Heads</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/04/ch-ch-ch-ch/#comment-368499</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooler Heads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/04/ch-ch-ch-ch/#comment-368499</guid>
		<description>Jeff, you asked in the comments in a post below why people are so excited when Obama says "change."  What does change actually mean, why does it mean something when he says it?

(Full disclosure: I have tended to vote GOP recently, and deeply regret a vote for Bush II.)

The biggest change that Obama proposes is the end of divisive partisan politics. He says it a lot, and so far I have not heard him engage in the deep ugliness that has swallowed up both parties in recent years. The Clintons have mastered the art of dirty politics, mudslinging, and name calling. Look at Bill's romp through South Carolina for proof of that.

And the Republicans? Do I need to list their activities or can we just stipulate?

This is why Obama is catching on. It's not health care, it's not some policy plank or party line. It's that he represents the potential end of "fight to death" partisan politics. He embraces "compromise," a strategy that marked US governance through about 1950. Since then, it's been "winner take all" politics, better to die than compromise. And look where it's gotten us.

When I hear Obama say "change," that's what I hear. When I say Clinton say "change," I think she means "It's time for the Bush's to go and the Clintons to take over again."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, you asked in the comments in a post below why people are so excited when Obama says &#8220;change.&#8221;  What does change actually mean, why does it mean something when he says it?</p>
<p>(Full disclosure: I have tended to vote GOP recently, and deeply regret a vote for Bush II.)</p>
<p>The biggest change that Obama proposes is the end of divisive partisan politics. He says it a lot, and so far I have not heard him engage in the deep ugliness that has swallowed up both parties in recent years. The Clintons have mastered the art of dirty politics, mudslinging, and name calling. Look at Bill&#8217;s romp through South Carolina for proof of that.</p>
<p>And the Republicans? Do I need to list their activities or can we just stipulate?</p>
<p>This is why Obama is catching on. It&#8217;s not health care, it&#8217;s not some policy plank or party line. It&#8217;s that he represents the potential end of &#8220;fight to death&#8221; partisan politics. He embraces &#8220;compromise,&#8221; a strategy that marked US governance through about 1950. Since then, it&#8217;s been &#8220;winner take all&#8221; politics, better to die than compromise. And look where it&#8217;s gotten us.</p>
<p>When I hear Obama say &#8220;change,&#8221; that&#8217;s what I hear. When I say Clinton say &#8220;change,&#8221; I think she means &#8220;It&#8217;s time for the Bush&#8217;s to go and the Clintons to take over again.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/04/ch-ch-ch-ch/#comment-368469</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/04/ch-ch-ch-ch/#comment-368469</guid>
		<description>Whenever I hear one of them say CHANGE, I instantly change the channel.  My clicker is wearing out--so damned many changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I hear one of them say CHANGE, I instantly change the channel.  My clicker is wearing out&#8211;so damned many changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob carlton</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/04/ch-ch-ch-ch/#comment-368454</link>
		<dc:creator>bob carlton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/04/ch-ch-ch-ch/#comment-368454</guid>
		<description>interesting, jeff, that you did not comment on:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IA8Wy51Ionk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting, jeff, that you did not comment on:  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IA8Wy51Ionk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IA8Wy51Ionk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: insignificant thoughts &#187; Change&#8230; The buzzword of 2008&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/04/ch-ch-ch-ch/#comment-368440</link>
		<dc:creator>insignificant thoughts &#187; Change&#8230; The buzzword of 2008&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/04/ch-ch-ch-ch/#comment-368440</guid>
		<description>[...] via Buzzmachine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Buzzmachine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
