<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reverse syndication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:21:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: All the news that&#8217;s fit to monetize (part II) &#187; Tell it slant</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-452766</link>
		<dc:creator>All the news that&#8217;s fit to monetize (part II) &#187; Tell it slant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 05:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-452766</guid>
		<description>[...] news is less certain. On the advertising side, a smart bet seems to be Jeff Jarvis’ concept of reverse syndication. The Oakland Tribune, for instance, would link to relevant business news from the WSJ instead of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news is less certain. On the advertising side, a smart bet seems to be Jeff Jarvis’ concept of reverse syndication. The Oakland Tribune, for instance, would link to relevant business news from the WSJ instead of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s the price of bread, stupid &#124; The Fullrunner</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-433189</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s the price of bread, stupid &#124; The Fullrunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-433189</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis suggests, we must focus on what we do well &#8212; and link to the rest. A bit of reverse syndication wouldn&#8217;t go amiss, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis suggests, we must focus on what we do well &#8212; and link to the rest. A bit of reverse syndication wouldn&#8217;t go amiss, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: come cambia la redazione giornalistica con il digitale? &#124; Ebook Lab Italia 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-432498</link>
		<dc:creator>come cambia la redazione giornalistica con il digitale? &#124; Ebook Lab Italia 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 17:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-432498</guid>
		<description>[...] la questione da un altro punto di vista: prendo in prestito l&#8217;espressione di Jeff Jarvis, Reverse Syndication per ipotizzare un processo, e quindi una redazione, diversa. La tecnologia digitale dovrebbe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] la questione da un altro punto di vista: prendo in prestito l&#8217;espressione di Jeff Jarvis, Reverse Syndication per ipotizzare un processo, e quindi una redazione, diversa. La tecnologia digitale dovrebbe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggasm &#187; Very Cool: New York Times linking to competitors&#8217; articles on its homepage</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-416056</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggasm &#187; Very Cool: New York Times linking to competitors&#8217; articles on its homepage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 02:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-416056</guid>
		<description>[...] so it now links to outside news sources. Is this one step closer to Jeff Jarvis&#8217; vision of reverse syndication? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so it now links to outside news sources. Is this one step closer to Jeff Jarvis&#8217; vision of reverse syndication? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Soir aime ses internautes &#171; On a des choses à se dire</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-414849</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Soir aime ses internautes &#171; On a des choses à se dire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 10:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-414849</guid>
		<description>[...] le principe est bon. Il repose sur le concept de reverse syndication, cher à Jeff [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] le principe est bon. Il repose sur le concept de reverse syndication, cher à Jeff [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On a des choses à se dire &#187; Archive du blog &#187; Nourrir l&#8217;écosystème du web</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-412823</link>
		<dc:creator>On a des choses à se dire &#187; Archive du blog &#187; Nourrir l&#8217;écosystème du web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-412823</guid>
		<description>[...] Sauf que ces ressources existent et sont opérationnelles. Si elles se professionnalisent et se mettent à produire, chacune dans leur niche, des produits structurés, les journaux pourront fonctionner comme des plate-formes. Ce seront des partenariats win-win. Nous leur fournirons les contenus, ils nous donneront accès aux lecteurs. Ce que Jeff Jarvis appelle la reverse syndication. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sauf que ces ressources existent et sont opérationnelles. Si elles se professionnalisent et se mettent à produire, chacune dans leur niche, des produits structurés, les journaux pourront fonctionner comme des plate-formes. Ce seront des partenariats win-win. Nous leur fournirons les contenus, ils nous donneront accès aux lecteurs. Ce que Jeff Jarvis appelle la reverse syndication. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Worthless readers &#171; BuzzMachine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-405071</link>
		<dc:creator>Worthless readers &#171; BuzzMachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-405071</guid>
		<description>[...] ad even after leaving and going to a harder-to-target local site). I&#8217;ve been arguing for reverse syndication as a means of maximizing ad value and even suggested that papers should link together to sell their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ad even after leaving and going to a harder-to-target local site). I&#8217;ve been arguing for reverse syndication as a means of maximizing ad value and even suggested that papers should link together to sell their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1. Solve journalism&#8217;s data problem. 2. Kill the AP. 3. Invest in the next market. &#171; BuzzMachine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-392792</link>
		<dc:creator>1. Solve journalism&#8217;s data problem. 2. Kill the AP. 3. Invest in the next market. &#171; BuzzMachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-392792</guid>
		<description>[...] to the Post to monetize that audience. This could be aided, though, by a marketplace that supports reverse syndication, which would send traffic to original journalism and even share revenue with those who send links [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the Post to monetize that audience. This could be aided, though, by a marketplace that supports reverse syndication, which would send traffic to original journalism and even share revenue with those who send links [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s the price of bread, stupid &#124; Media Money</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-391885</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s the price of bread, stupid &#124; Media Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-391885</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis suggests, we must focus on what we do well &#8212; and link to the rest. A bit of reverse syndication wouldn&#8217;t go amiss, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis suggests, we must focus on what we do well &#8212; and link to the rest. A bit of reverse syndication wouldn&#8217;t go amiss, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newspapers and How I Would Change Them &#124; Social Media in the Real World</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-389442</link>
		<dc:creator>Newspapers and How I Would Change Them &#124; Social Media in the Real World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-389442</guid>
		<description>[...] Businesses like the Travel Channel are turning aspiring filmmakers into travel journalists, and newspapers can do this too (it&#8217;s called reverse syndication). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Businesses like the Travel Channel are turning aspiring filmmakers into travel journalists, and newspapers can do this too (it&#8217;s called reverse syndication). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Printed Matters &#187; New business models for news: another step required</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-387544</link>
		<dc:creator>Printed Matters &#187; New business models for news: another step required</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-387544</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis calls this reverse syndication. If you&#8217;re like me, you have trouble getting your head around the notion of reverse [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis calls this reverse syndication. If you&#8217;re like me, you have trouble getting your head around the notion of reverse [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A new business model in action</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-387347</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A new business model in action</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-387347</guid>
		<description>[...] groundbreaking use of the reverse-syndication model has now expanded with Reuters acting as a distributor and marketer.  The agreement will offer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] groundbreaking use of the reverse-syndication model has now expanded with Reuters acting as a distributor and marketer.  The agreement will offer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El nuevo escenario informativo (traducción del anterior) : Centro de Estudios de Medios</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-387152</link>
		<dc:creator>El nuevo escenario informativo (traducción del anterior) : Centro de Estudios de Medios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-387152</guid>
		<description>[...] mismo se puede aplicar a la cobertura informativa de Washington D.C.; es lo que ha empezado a hacer Politico. Lo mismo va a ocurrir con las corresponsalías en el extranjero (véase el caso de la oficina en [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mismo se puede aplicar a la cobertura informativa de Washington D.C.; es lo que ha empezado a hacer Politico. Lo mismo va a ocurrir con las corresponsalías en el extranjero (véase el caso de la oficina en [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A scenario for news</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-385983</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A scenario for news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-385983</guid>
		<description>[...] on other sites with its ads attached. The same can be true of Washington coverage; that is what Politico has started. The same will happen with foreign bureau coverage (see The Time&#8217;s Baghdad bureau, which the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on other sites with its ads attached. The same can be true of Washington coverage; that is what Politico has started. The same will happen with foreign bureau coverage (see The Time&#8217;s Baghdad bureau, which the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The birth of networks</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-385470</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The birth of networks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-385470</guid>
		<description>[...] a vastly different base of shared knowledge. But domestically and locally, I think that sharing and reverse syndication (a la Political) will win the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a vastly different base of shared knowledge. But domestically and locally, I think that sharing and reverse syndication (a la Political) will win the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newsgator Widgets NFL Widget Campaign &#124; Widgets Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-385009</link>
		<dc:creator>Newsgator Widgets NFL Widget Campaign &#124; Widgets Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-385009</guid>
		<description>[...] are embarking on. (For an excellent introduction to reverse syndication, I highly recommend you read Jeff Jarvis&#8217; excellent post on the topic.)&#160; We&#8217;re in the process of launching &quot;Across the Field&quot; widgets with 32 online [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are embarking on. (For an excellent introduction to reverse syndication, I highly recommend you read Jeff Jarvis&#8217; excellent post on the topic.)&#160; We&#8217;re in the process of launching &quot;Across the Field&quot; widgets with 32 online [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inessential.com: &#8216;Reverse syndication&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-384720</link>
		<dc:creator>inessential.com: &#8216;Reverse syndication&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-384720</guid>
		<description>[...] model is called reverse syndication: you can read more about it.  28 Oct 2008 12:03 pm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] model is called reverse syndication: you can read more about it.  28 Oct 2008 12:03 pm [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Larson</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-384561</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Larson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-384561</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

A superb post on this subject.  I&#039;ve linked to it in the NewsGator widget blog as we are embarking on a reverse syndication/atomization of content strategy.

Best,

     Josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>A superb post on this subject.  I&#8217;ve linked to it in the NewsGator widget blog as we are embarking on a reverse syndication/atomization of content strategy.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>     Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will wire services fall first as newspapers decline?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-384269</link>
		<dc:creator>Will wire services fall first as newspapers decline?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-384269</guid>
		<description>[...] an interesting idea, and you can read Jarvis&#8217; full explanation in this post. It is possible that one day a model some what like what Jarvis is suggesting will come to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an interesting idea, and you can read Jarvis&#8217; full explanation in this post. It is possible that one day a model some what like what Jarvis is suggesting will come to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The start of reverse syndication (and end of the AP?)</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-382621</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The start of reverse syndication (and end of the AP?)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-382621</guid>
		<description>[...] will share revenue with the papers. Politico&#8217;s deal is the first major substantiation of the reverse-syndication model, a product of the link economy. It&#8217;s another nail in the heart of the Associated Press, which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will share revenue with the papers. Politico&#8217;s deal is the first major substantiation of the reverse-syndication model, a product of the link economy. It&#8217;s another nail in the heart of the Associated Press, which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laketahoepublictv</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-380739</link>
		<dc:creator>laketahoepublictv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-380739</guid>
		<description>Thanks. Great blog bro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Great blog bro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The ethic of the link layer on news</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-376401</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The ethic of the link layer on news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-376401</guid>
		<description>[...] it is not hampered as a cooperative and is building a consumer brand? I&#8217;ve talked about a reverse syndication model as a new opportunity, which was actually sprung from a talk with an AP executive but it is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it is not hampered as a cooperative and is building a consumer brand? I&#8217;ve talked about a reverse syndication model as a new opportunity, which was actually sprung from a talk with an AP executive but it is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trouble for NPR</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-370614</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trouble for NPR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 07:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-370614</guid>
		<description>[...] there are other models for local support. When I wrote about reverse syndication as a model for national coverage in newspapers, served up by the New York Times and its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there are other models for local support. When I wrote about reverse syndication as a model for national coverage in newspapers, served up by the New York Times and its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Mims</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-370158</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Mims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-370158</guid>
		<description>This already exists. Except in the model that already exists, companies syndicate content (for free) to other sites that post it on their own domain, where they can monetize it themselves. The benefit to the syndicator is that the articles are filled with links back to the parent site.

So everyone wins: in your metaphor, if the Times did this, the Tribune would get free (!) war coverage, the Times would get more traffic, and both could monetize the results. And they don&#039;t even have to establish some kind of complicated revenue-sharing agreement!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This already exists. Except in the model that already exists, companies syndicate content (for free) to other sites that post it on their own domain, where they can monetize it themselves. The benefit to the syndicator is that the articles are filled with links back to the parent site.</p>
<p>So everyone wins: in your metaphor, if the Times did this, the Tribune would get free (!) war coverage, the Times would get more traffic, and both could monetize the results. And they don&#8217;t even have to establish some kind of complicated revenue-sharing agreement!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Proffitt</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-369510</link>
		<dc:creator>John Proffitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/02/15/reverse-syndication/#comment-369510</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve begun to promote a similar idea, specifically in the public media world. Local public TV and public radio stations today pay hundreds of thousands and sometimes millions to NPR, PBS, APTS, PRI, APM and other content providers (with NPR and PBS being the most obvious). This has stifled the local public media companies&#039; ability to produce local content. They blow all their cash paying the networks.

Reverse syndication in this world, to my thinking, is to have the networks sell their content to the public (ads, membership revenue) and give all the content to the local media outlets for free -- with the caveat that embedded ads pass through with the content. Local outlets could then produce local media and still pick from the best national media and arrange it into locally-relevant streams/blocks on the web, on transmitters, etc.

This would also clean up the nasty co-dependent relationships between the local stations and the networks, as it would clarify the roles of each.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve begun to promote a similar idea, specifically in the public media world. Local public TV and public radio stations today pay hundreds of thousands and sometimes millions to NPR, PBS, APTS, PRI, APM and other content providers (with NPR and PBS being the most obvious). This has stifled the local public media companies&#8217; ability to produce local content. They blow all their cash paying the networks.</p>
<p>Reverse syndication in this world, to my thinking, is to have the networks sell their content to the public (ads, membership revenue) and give all the content to the local media outlets for free &#8212; with the caveat that embedded ads pass through with the content. Local outlets could then produce local media and still pick from the best national media and arrange it into locally-relevant streams/blocks on the web, on transmitters, etc.</p>
<p>This would also clean up the nasty co-dependent relationships between the local stations and the networks, as it would clarify the roles of each.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

