<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elected by Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/03/28/elected-by-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/03/28/elected-by-google/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Twitter y estrategia polÃ­tica en internet &#124; Ciudadanos y Consumidores</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/03/28/elected-by-google/#comment-373024</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter y estrategia polÃ­tica en internet &#124; Ciudadanos y Consumidores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 08:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/03/28/elected-by-google/#comment-373024</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama sÃ­ lo ha comprendido, lo que se refleja tambiÃ©n en sus gastos de campaÃ±a. Como informan BuzzMachine y WebGuild, Obama ha gastado mucho mÃ¡s dinero en nuevos medios, mientras que Hillary Clinton [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama sÃ­ lo ha comprendido, lo que se refleja tambiÃ©n en sus gastos de campaÃ±a. Como informan BuzzMachine y WebGuild, Obama ha gastado mucho mÃ¡s dinero en nuevos medios, mientras que Hillary Clinton [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/03/28/elected-by-google/#comment-372358</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/03/28/elected-by-google/#comment-372358</guid>
		<description>It might also mean that Obama is getting a lot more clickthrus than Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might also mean that Obama is getting a lot more clickthrus than Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/03/28/elected-by-google/#comment-372319</link>
		<dc:creator>crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/03/28/elected-by-google/#comment-372319</guid>
		<description>Okay, that should say case STUDY, not stud. I mean, I like Obama, voted for him in the primary, donated to his campaign. But I wouldn't go so far as as call him a stud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, that should say case STUDY, not stud. I mean, I like Obama, voted for him in the primary, donated to his campaign. But I wouldn&#8217;t go so far as as call him a stud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/03/28/elected-by-google/#comment-372318</link>
		<dc:creator>crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/03/28/elected-by-google/#comment-372318</guid>
		<description>It's a case stud in the making, no doubt. Hurry up and finish that WWGD book and get on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a case stud in the making, no doubt. Hurry up and finish that WWGD book and get on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Mays</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/03/28/elected-by-google/#comment-372277</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Mays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/03/28/elected-by-google/#comment-372277</guid>
		<description>"Elected by Google" I contributed to the Obama campaign and don't recall seeing one add on Google (I use gmail, google reader, maps, etc). I just didn't notice. I just turned 60 and this is the first time in my life I've given money to a political campaign. Couldn't we say, "Elected by Steve?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Elected by Google&#8221; I contributed to the Obama campaign and don&#8217;t recall seeing one add on Google (I use gmail, google reader, maps, etc). I just didn&#8217;t notice. I just turned 60 and this is the first time in my life I&#8217;ve given money to a political campaign. Couldn&#8217;t we say, &#8220;Elected by Steve?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PXLated</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/03/28/elected-by-google/#comment-372275</link>
		<dc:creator>PXLated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/03/28/elected-by-google/#comment-372275</guid>
		<description>Yep - Just proves Clinton is old school - no "change" in that candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep - Just proves Clinton is old school - no &#8220;change&#8221; in that candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
