<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s about aggregation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/15/its-about-aggregation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/15/its-about-aggregation/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bittorrent</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/15/its-about-aggregation/#comment-375218</link>
		<dc:creator>bittorrent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 02:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3611#comment-375218</guid>
		<description>The BBC isn't 'state funded' it is funded by members of the public through a TV licence. If you have a TV you pay the licence fee and it is far better value than companies that have ads and shareholders. 

It works out at about $5.30 per week. Tell me that's a bad deal for all the ad-free BBC TV channels and radio stations.  

Any money the BBC makes from international advertising revenue, goes back into prgramme making, there is no profit and there are no shareholders. Which means more programmes for UK viewers for less money. 

So Emily Bell, please explain how that is a bad deal for the British public. I think you mean it is a bad deal for The Guardian, which can't even get a decent Flash player on its website yet, and other vested interests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BBC isn&#8217;t &#8217;state funded&#8217; it is funded by members of the public through a TV licence. If you have a TV you pay the licence fee and it is far better value than companies that have ads and shareholders. </p>
<p>It works out at about $5.30 per week. Tell me that&#8217;s a bad deal for all the ad-free BBC TV channels and radio stations.  </p>
<p>Any money the BBC makes from international advertising revenue, goes back into prgramme making, there is no profit and there are no shareholders. Which means more programmes for UK viewers for less money. </p>
<p>So Emily Bell, please explain how that is a bad deal for the British public. I think you mean it is a bad deal for The Guardian, which can&#8217;t even get a decent Flash player on its website yet, and other vested interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Build the Echo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-05-16</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/15/its-about-aggregation/#comment-375165</link>
		<dc:creator>Build the Echo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-05-16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3611#comment-375165</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » It’s about aggregation Top brands with international traffic should be banding together to sell that traffic and audience as a group. No one of them has successfully and fully exploited the value of this audience now and, as Martin Nisenholtz of the NY Times pointed out, each o (tags: buildtheecho business_models aggregation)     Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » It’s about aggregation Top brands with international traffic should be banding together to sell that traffic and audience as a group. No one of them has successfully and fully exploited the value of this audience now and, as Martin Nisenholtz of the NY Times pointed out, each o (tags: buildtheecho business_models aggregation)     Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BBC Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/15/its-about-aggregation/#comment-375141</link>
		<dc:creator>BBC Advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3611#comment-375141</guid>
		<description>[...] on to point out how advertising on Comment is Free is completely sold out. As Guardian columnist,Jeff Jarvis, says on his own blog, Buzz Machine, &#8216;Get that: ads sell out on a site with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on to point out how advertising on Comment is Free is completely sold out. As Guardian columnist,Jeff Jarvis, says on his own blog, Buzz Machine, &#8216;Get that: ads sell out on a site with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad King</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/15/its-about-aggregation/#comment-375114</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 22:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3611#comment-375114</guid>
		<description>Banding together is a bad way to run a business, particularly when they are so many other ways to create revenues off content that already exists - whether it be on-demand, user-created books from pre-existing content (or company-design books around selling seasons) to building databases and APIs that open up information to the public...

The long term solution isn't finding a better way to sell a banner. Smart netizens haven't seen a banner in years (thank you AdBlock). Smart companies like eBay, Amazon and :gulp: Apple realize the money -- the real money -- is in selling products, things, stuff you can hold or use.

Newspapers can do that digitally as well -- if they begin to think outside the  (computer) box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banding together is a bad way to run a business, particularly when they are so many other ways to create revenues off content that already exists - whether it be on-demand, user-created books from pre-existing content (or company-design books around selling seasons) to building databases and APIs that open up information to the public&#8230;</p>
<p>The long term solution isn&#8217;t finding a better way to sell a banner. Smart netizens haven&#8217;t seen a banner in years (thank you AdBlock). Smart companies like eBay, Amazon and :gulp: Apple realize the money &#8212; the real money &#8212; is in selling products, things, stuff you can hold or use.</p>
<p>Newspapers can do that digitally as well &#8212; if they begin to think outside the  (computer) box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
