Twitter as the canary in the news coalmine
Here’s my latest Guardian column about Twitter as news (it got trimmed in print — damned scarce paper — and so here’s my draft):
Last Monday, when an earthquake struck China’s Sichuan province, word of it spread quickly from witnesses on the shaking ground via Twitter, the mobile-and-web microblogging service where users share brief, 140-character-long updates with friends. Prolific blogger and Twitterer Robert Scoble at scobleizer.com insists he saw news of the quake on Twitter minutes before the US Geological Service posted the temblor and an hour before CNN and other news sites reported it.
Twitter is becoming the canary in the news coalmine. It stands to reason: If you’ve just gone through such a major event, you are sure to want to update your friends about it. If enough people are all chattering about an earthquake at the same time, that’s a good and immediate indication of a major news story.
Developers at the BBC and Reuters have picked up on the potential for this. They are working on applications to monitor Twitter, the Twitter search engine Summize, and other social-media services – Flickr, YouTube, Facebook – for news catchwords like “earthquake” and “evacuation”. They hope for two benefits: first, an early warning of news and second a way to find witness media – photos, videos, and accounts from the event. This is clearly more efficient than waiting for reporters and photographers to get to the scene after the news is over – though, of course, they will still go and do what journalists do: report, verify facts (which can be wrong from witnesses in the heat of news), package, and take their own pictures (which they then own).
These social services are also a source of witnesses for journalists to interview. After the Chinese quake, user “casperodj” reported his experience – “it did feel like the earth was going to split. literally everything was shaking” – and what followed – “CREEPY! while i’m typing, there’s an aftershock hitting!” – and the mood on the street – “the shitty concrete buildings around me are still ok though. people seem to be going back to work again” – and also told his readers when he’d gotten off the air with the BBC and Dutch broadcasters.
All this comes from a platform that does nothing more than enable anyone to tell anyone what they’re up to. But this is fundamentally new. We online citizens are living in public, revealing small details of our lives with our updates and our content. It’s in the smallness of this personal news that we can keep in touch with friends in ways we have not been able to since we lived in small towns, able to watch our neighbors’ every move. So perhaps this is not new at all but a return to the old ways: the electronic village, indeed.
London blogger Leisa Reichelt at disambiguity.com has a name for this: “Ambient intimacy is about being able to keep in touch with people with a level of regularity and intimacy that you wouldn’t usually have access to, because time and space conspire to make it impossible.” We get to see what our friends had for lunch and with whom, hear about their trips, see their new haircuts. The mundanity of it is the message.
“Isn’t this all just annoying noise?” Reichelt asks and answers: “There are a lot of us, though, who find great value in this ongoing noise. It helps us get to know people who would otherwise be just acquaintances. It makes us feel closer to people we care for but in whose lives we’re not able to participate as closely as we’d like. Knowing these details creates intimacy.”
I have speculated in this space that our new publicness and permanence online will change even friendship, as we no longer need to lose touch with old acquaintances. Just last week, I met up and caught up with my high-school sweetheart after (gulp) 33 years and that was made possible only because she Googled me.
Now it’s also become clear that this publicness and immediacy is yielding both a new relationships and new value: ways to find and report news for a start. Perhaps our chattering will also reveal our collective mood (for that, go to twistori.com and see all Twitter posts that include the words love, hate, think, and wish). Companies are now monitoring Twitter, as the smart ones have been watching blogs, to see what is said about their brands (the cable giant Comcast saw powerful blogger Michael Arrington of techcrunch.com complaining about an outage in Twitter and quickly dispatched a repairman).
When we start putting our lives online, it’s now possible to take our pulse in new ways. And that’s news. For what is news, after all, but what is happening to us?
Tags: guardian, newarchitecture, newbiznews, twitter, wwgd
May 19th, 2008 at 7:16 am
[...] idea of noise as a positive aspect of Twitter is gaining traction. Jeff Jarvis quotes blogger Leisa Reichelt on the benefits of noise: “Isn’t this all just annoying [...]
May 19th, 2008 at 9:31 am
[...] bonus link: Jeff Jarvis on why Twitter is the canary in the news coalmine. Another day, another metaphor to explain Twitter. permalink | categories: blogging, [...]
May 19th, 2008 at 10:29 am
[...] Ambient Intimacy — the feeling of connection that social networking and microblogging platforms (such as Twitter) create through the regularity and transparency of information being shared (my summary) [...]
May 19th, 2008 at 10:57 am
[...] this week, everyday people knew about the devastating earthquake in China before the media even broke the news, thanks to [...]
May 19th, 2008 at 11:06 am
has anyone covered how twitter is also becoming, in some circles, an public backchannel tool for carrying out passive-aggressive arguments in the open? I was surprised to see a wave of this over the last week or two. This may be old news, but I usually go to twitter expecting fuzzy bunnies.
May 19th, 2008 at 3:57 pm
Very different circumstances, but same kind of thing: I started a little crowdsourcing experiment last week, encouraging NJ train commuters to send tweets if their trains are late. (See URL behind my name). NJ.com and Barista tweeted about this morning’s delay.
May 19th, 2008 at 9:28 pm
[...] meer dan het Twitteren zelf. Het is een nieuw communicatiemodel. Geschikt voor brekend nieuws (als kanarie in de kolenmijn), het lokaal filteren van gesprekken, het luisteren naar de ruis (handig voor journalisten), het [...]
May 20th, 2008 at 12:35 am
[...] Twitter as the canary in the news coalmine | BuzzMachine Quote - When we start putting our lives online, it’s now possible to take our pulse in new ways. And that’s news. For what is news, after all, but what is happening to us? (tags: journalism twitter noise) [...]
May 20th, 2008 at 2:12 am
Pls ask local folks:
*Why those relatively new school buildings collapsed worse than the much older structures?
*Any kickbacks involved when they were built?
*Can PRC become a great nation if kickbacks & bribery continue?
May 20th, 2008 at 2:47 am
[...] as a news media" meme is adding momentum. Today Jeff Jarvis posted his thoughts and they are quite insightful: this publicness and immediacy is yielding both a [...]
May 20th, 2008 at 11:34 am
[...] BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » Twitter as the canary in the news coalmine “Twitter is the canary in the news coalmine. If you’ve just gone through a major event, you’ll want to tell your friends. If enough people are all chattering about an earthquake at the same time, that’s a good and immediate indication of big news.” (tags: twitter breaking+news journalism social+media disaster roles media+evolution tidbits+fodder) [...]
May 21st, 2008 at 9:57 am
[...] blogger Jeff Jarvis calls Twitter “the canary in the news coalmine.” Last Monday, when an earthquake struck China’s Sichuan province, word of it spread [...]
May 24th, 2008 at 1:31 am
[...] blogs, on Twitter and on Facebook for help in writing stories. Jeff Jarvis calls Twitter the “canary in the news coalmine.” It stands to reason: If you’ve just gone through such a major event, you are sure to want [...]
May 27th, 2008 at 10:15 am
[...] “The canary in the coal mine.” [...]
June 1st, 2008 at 7:24 am
[...] Twitter has been getting some publicity lately, looking at its value as a reporting tool. Here are some articles on the subject: http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/19/twitter-as-the-canary-in-the-news-coalmine/ http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/18/why-google-news-has-no-noise/ http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2008/05/microblogging_maniatwitter_hel.html http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/30/project-vino-twitter-wine-tasting/ http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/how-journalists-can-master-twitter/ http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/twitter_for_journalists.php http://www.journalism.co.uk/7/articles/531439.php [...]