<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: Cut to the Twitter chase</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-401103</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-401103</guid>
		<description>I wonder at what point do antitrust concerns stop Google from purchasing a company like twitter?  Google is a monopolist in search.  Probably one in online text advertising.  Should they be allowed to gobble up microblogging as well?  I just wish there was another smartly run company on the horizon to present a counterweight to Google for anything having to do with the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder at what point do antitrust concerns stop Google from purchasing a company like twitter?  Google is a monopolist in search.  Probably one in online text advertising.  Should they be allowed to gobble up microblogging as well?  I just wish there was another smartly run company on the horizon to present a counterweight to Google for anything having to do with the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moving From Me To We.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How many speakers and panelists really want to know…</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-376447</link>
		<dc:creator>Moving From Me To We.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How many speakers and panelists really want to know…</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-376447</guid>
		<description>[...] am a bit defensive. So here&#8217;s tips to tweak your Twittering at conferences and elsewhere. If it does improve, Twittering will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] am a bit defensive. So here&#8217;s tips to tweak your Twittering at conferences and elsewhere. If it does improve, Twittering will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-05-29 &#124; stuart henshall</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-375941</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-05-29 &#124; stuart henshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 08:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-375941</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine » Google: Cut to the Twitter chase Hmmmm&#8230; It could work and yet how do I feel about Twitter being in Google&#8217;s hands? Not good! What do others say? (tags: google twitter) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine » Google: Cut to the Twitter chase Hmmmm&#8230; It could work and yet how do I feel about Twitter being in Google&#8217;s hands? Not good! What do others say? (tags: google twitter) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-375898</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-375898</guid>
		<description>Yeah. Google did wonders for Dodgeball. The only consolation is that at least they haven&#039;t killed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. Google did wonders for Dodgeball. The only consolation is that at least they haven&#8217;t killed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Park Paradigm &#187; Plus ca change&#8230;(?)</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-375879</link>
		<dc:creator>The Park Paradigm &#187; Plus ca change&#8230;(?)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 12:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-375879</guid>
		<description>[...] second was a post over at Technosailor taking issue with Jeff Jarvis&#8217; view that the current problems of Twitter could be solved were they to be acquired by Yahoo Microsoft [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] second was a post over at Technosailor taking issue with Jeff Jarvis&#8217; view that the current problems of Twitter could be solved were they to be acquired by Yahoo Microsoft [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Fawzi</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-375867</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Fawzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-375867</guid>
		<description>Just build a Flash 10-enabled P2P version of Twitter and get it over with.

http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/p2p-version-of-twitter-using-flash-10/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just build a Flash 10-enabled P2P version of Twitter and get it over with.</p>
<p><a href="http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/p2p-version-of-twitter-using-flash-10/" rel="nofollow">http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/p2p-version-of-twitter-using-flash-10/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Cannot Fix Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-375865</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Cannot Fix Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 01:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-375865</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis thinks that only Google can fix Twitter&#8217;s woes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis thinks that only Google can fix Twitter&#8217;s woes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-375845</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 18:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-375845</guid>
		<description>I also second what was said about Jaiku. You remember what happened to Dodgeball? Dodgeball was everything Twitter was plus more until Google bought it and pretty much slowed development to a halt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also second what was said about Jaiku. You remember what happened to Dodgeball? Dodgeball was everything Twitter was plus more until Google bought it and pretty much slowed development to a halt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wyman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-375809</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Wyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-375809</guid>
		<description>SteveSgt says: &quot;suggest that some folks collaborate on an open standard?&quot;
Well, there *already* is a standard and Twitter uses it! (slightly modified). It&#039;s called &quot;Atom over XMPP.&quot; (Disclaimer: I&#039;m a co-author). Anyway, If you want to see discussion of what could be done in the future, see the proposed microblogging standard (an expansion on &quot;Atom over HTTP&quot; at:  http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/microblogging.html .

The problem here is not &quot;standards.&quot; Rather it is one of business models. 

bob wyman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SteveSgt says: &#8220;suggest that some folks collaborate on an open standard?&#8221;<br />
Well, there *already* is a standard and Twitter uses it! (slightly modified). It&#8217;s called &#8220;Atom over XMPP.&#8221; (Disclaimer: I&#8217;m a co-author). Anyway, If you want to see discussion of what could be done in the future, see the proposed microblogging standard (an expansion on &#8220;Atom over HTTP&#8221; at:  <a href="http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/microblogging.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/microblogging.html</a> .</p>
<p>The problem here is not &#8220;standards.&#8221; Rather it is one of business models. </p>
<p>bob wyman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voyagerfan5761</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-375796</link>
		<dc:creator>Voyagerfan5761</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 06:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-375796</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry adam, but SocialThing! should just die.

I wouldn&#039;t mind Google buying Twitter and integrating it with Jaiku. Stability and a few extra features would be neat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry adam, but SocialThing! should just die.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind Google buying Twitter and integrating it with Jaiku. Stability and a few extra features would be neat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam saverian</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-375785</link>
		<dc:creator>adam saverian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 03:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-375785</guid>
		<description>oh, I can&#039;t spell. Google should buy socialthing, not just walk &#039;by&#039; them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, I can&#8217;t spell. Google should buy socialthing, not just walk &#8216;by&#8217; them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam saverian</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-375784</link>
		<dc:creator>adam saverian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 03:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-375784</guid>
		<description>Google should just by SocialThing - It&#039;s much better than FriendFeed in my opinion - and beef it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google should just by SocialThing &#8211; It&#8217;s much better than FriendFeed in my opinion &#8211; and beef it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveSgt</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-375779</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveSgt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 02:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-375779</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want anybody to &quot;own&quot; the short messaging/micro-blogging standard (nor any standard for that matter).  Not Google, not M$, nor any Yahoo.

Rather than asking someone to exploit it for their profit, why not, in the spirit of the open-source community, suggest that some folks collaborate on an open standard? Such an open standard would not be dependent on a particular web site. It wouldn’t be at the mercy of a particular vendor. It could be readily implemented by every social networking host, portable internet device, and a range of other access points that nobody has thought of. That’s the way to build a better bird cage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want anybody to &#8220;own&#8221; the short messaging/micro-blogging standard (nor any standard for that matter).  Not Google, not M$, nor any Yahoo.</p>
<p>Rather than asking someone to exploit it for their profit, why not, in the spirit of the open-source community, suggest that some folks collaborate on an open standard? Such an open standard would not be dependent on a particular web site. It wouldn’t be at the mercy of a particular vendor. It could be readily implemented by every social networking host, portable internet device, and a range of other access points that nobody has thought of. That’s the way to build a better bird cage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-375745</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 21:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-375745</guid>
		<description>Google did purchase Twitter competitor Jaiku earlier this year.  If Ev can pull off a stable Twitter, he&#039;ll fetch a much higher price for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google did purchase Twitter competitor Jaiku earlier this year.  If Ev can pull off a stable Twitter, he&#8217;ll fetch a much higher price for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack D. Male</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-375744</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack D. Male</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 21:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-375744</guid>
		<description>I hope Google doesn&#039;t buy Twitter. I fear it would end up like Jaiku...forgotten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Google doesn&#8217;t buy Twitter. I fear it would end up like Jaiku&#8230;forgotten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/05/25/google-cut-to-the-twitter-chase/#comment-375742</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 20:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3632#comment-375742</guid>
		<description>Will it last though?  FriendFeed is ramping up and seems to be getting a lot of attention with all of Twitter&#039;s issues of late.  FWIW, Twiter has had issues since its inception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will it last though?  FriendFeed is ramping up and seems to be getting a lot of attention with all of Twitter&#8217;s issues of late.  FWIW, Twiter has had issues since its inception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
