<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A proposal to the Associated Press: A link ethic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Truth! What a concept! &#8211; MorganWick.com</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-400744</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth! What a concept! &#8211; MorganWick.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-400744</guid>
		<description>[...] legal services. There is some sort of partnership with Newsweek. Rabble-rousing blogger Jeff Jarvis is a member. But the association is a self-appointed representative of a hugely diverse group, and its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] legal services. There is some sort of partnership with Newsweek. Rabble-rousing blogger Jeff Jarvis is a member. But the association is a self-appointed representative of a hugely diverse group, and its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why The Associated Press plans to hold some web content off the wire &#187; Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-399461</link>
		<dc:creator>Why The Associated Press plans to hold some web content off the wire &#187; Nieman Journalism Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-399461</guid>
		<description>[...] of people have observed — and the AP surely understands — that the consortium&#8217;s 163-year-old, print-centric [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of people have observed — and the AP surely understands — that the consortium&#8217;s 163-year-old, print-centric [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: media news now</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-393074</link>
		<dc:creator>media news now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-393074</guid>
		<description>[...] commentator Jeff Jarvis tried to mediate, and then lost his temper. Michael Arrington urged a boycott of the AP (wonder how that went over [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] commentator Jeff Jarvis tried to mediate, and then lost his temper. Michael Arrington urged a boycott of the AP (wonder how that went over [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The evolution of the Mediasaurus &#8212; MISTERDIBSTER</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-392891</link>
		<dc:creator>The evolution of the Mediasaurus &#8212; MISTERDIBSTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-392891</guid>
		<description>[...] All of this points to a deeper fundamental issue where media organisations still stuck in the yesteryear are struggling to cope with what some has termed the link economy. In this Internet period of humankind, I think the question is not about whether people should be allowed to link/quote/excerpt from the original content but rather, it is an issue of ethical linking. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All of this points to a deeper fundamental issue where media organisations still stuck in the yesteryear are struggling to cope with what some has termed the link economy. In this Internet period of humankind, I think the question is not about whether people should be allowed to link/quote/excerpt from the original content but rather, it is an issue of ethical linking. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1. Solve journalism&#8217;s data problem. 2. Kill the AP. 3. Invest in the next market. &#171; BuzzMachine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-392880</link>
		<dc:creator>1. Solve journalism&#8217;s data problem. 2. Kill the AP. 3. Invest in the next market. &#171; BuzzMachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-392880</guid>
		<description>[...] and links to the sources, a moral necessity in the link economy; I urged the AP to adopt such a link ethic last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and links to the sources, a moral necessity in the link economy; I urged the AP to adopt such a link ethic last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A danger to journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-387952</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A danger to journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-387952</guid>
		<description>[...] we need more links to more journalism at its source, as I proposed to the Associated Press in the midst of its aborted antilink crusade. Links are also the key to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we need more links to more journalism at its source, as I proposed to the Associated Press in the midst of its aborted antilink crusade. Links are also the key to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Los periódicos encogerán o desaparecerán. &#124; EQUISELE</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-384312</link>
		<dc:creator>Los periódicos encogerán o desaparecerán. &#124; EQUISELE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-384312</guid>
		<description>[...] Artículo  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Artículo  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethic of the link, revisited &#171; The Future of Journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-384223</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethic of the link, revisited &#171; The Future of Journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-384223</guid>
		<description>[...] from Jeff Jarvis on this subject here and more on links [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from Jeff Jarvis on this subject here and more on links [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citar o no citar en los blogs &#124; Proyecto web</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-383681</link>
		<dc:creator>Citar o no citar en los blogs &#124; Proyecto web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 08:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-383681</guid>
		<description>[...] que queda claro es que, mientras no exista un criterio claro y no subjetivo sobre cuál es el límite permisible para ser considerado una cita y no un [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] que queda claro es que, mientras no exista un criterio claro y no subjetivo sobre cuál es el límite permisible para ser considerado una cita y no un [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Edlen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-379694</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Edlen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-379694</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

Re: your comment on June 21st

That&#039;s what I&#039;d say.  Let them build their wall.  What are they trying to keep out again?

Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>Re: your comment on June 21st</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I&#8217;d say.  Let them build their wall.  What are they trying to keep out again?</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where are the long and thought provoking articles? &#124; Glowrich on New Media</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-379648</link>
		<dc:creator>Where are the long and thought provoking articles? &#124; Glowrich on New Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-379648</guid>
		<description>[...] to other news outlets. Not really a long article, but several short ones about the same issue. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Michael Arrington at TechCrunch wrote about the same [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to other news outlets. Not really a long article, but several short ones about the same issue. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Michael Arrington at TechCrunch wrote about the same [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keep Faking It &#187; Syndicate the conversation</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-377996</link>
		<dc:creator>Keep Faking It &#187; Syndicate the conversation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-377996</guid>
		<description>[...] AP actually should be embracing the conversation. Jeff Jarvis mentions that one way for the AP to move forward would be for it to stop homogenizing co.... Well how about this. How about it lets anyone take its stories, but as part of the deal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AP actually should be embracing the conversation. Jeff Jarvis mentions that one way for the AP to move forward would be for it to stop homogenizing co&#8230;. Well how about this. How about it lets anyone take its stories, but as part of the deal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shafqat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-377857</link>
		<dc:creator>Shafqat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-377857</guid>
		<description>@Jeff - I think Rick makes a good point when it comes to aggregators and so-called &#039;social news sites.&#039; The AP does allow these sites to host full articles, and the price is fairly reasonable but still out of the reach of regular bloggers. As you point out, most bloggers don&#039;t want to nor to they need to buy AP content.

However, there are news aggregation sites out there, such as mine (full disclosure: I&#039;m cofounder of NewsCered), that should pay for content. Otherwise, we get into splogging territory which is clearly undesirable. For everyone else and also for my personal writing, the ethic of the link and quote is how I will live and die.

Shafqat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeff &#8211; I think Rick makes a good point when it comes to aggregators and so-called &#8217;social news sites.&#8217; The AP does allow these sites to host full articles, and the price is fairly reasonable but still out of the reach of regular bloggers. As you point out, most bloggers don&#8217;t want to nor to they need to buy AP content.</p>
<p>However, there are news aggregation sites out there, such as mine (full disclosure: I&#8217;m cofounder of NewsCered), that should pay for content. Otherwise, we get into splogging territory which is clearly undesirable. For everyone else and also for my personal writing, the ethic of the link and quote is how I will live and die.</p>
<p>Shafqat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-377778</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-377778</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want to buy AP content. I&#039;m not putting stories up on my site. I sometimes did want to quote, link to, promote, and benefit AP stories. But I can always find the same story somewhere else and the AP&#039;s is the most commodified version, always. I&#039;d rather find, link to, and quote original reporting. And if the AP doesn&#039;t want our links, well, that is certainly their loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to buy AP content. I&#8217;m not putting stories up on my site. I sometimes did want to quote, link to, promote, and benefit AP stories. But I can always find the same story somewhere else and the AP&#8217;s is the most commodified version, always. I&#8217;d rather find, link to, and quote original reporting. And if the AP doesn&#8217;t want our links, well, that is certainly their loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Hancock</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-377775</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Hancock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-377775</guid>
		<description>The AP is now in the business of marketing many of its services, why not create affordable blogger accounts. iTunes and other music pay sites figured out a way for people to buy instead of illegally download music. I did a very quick check on the AP website and came across this on its FAQ page

&quot; How can I become a member of The Associated Press and receive AP services?
If you are a newspaper, radio or television station, you can become a member of the AP cooperative. 

If you are not a member of The Associated Press, but want to receive AP news for your Web site or wireless service, company intranet, desktop or other interactive application, you can contact AP Digital. &quot;

Not sure how much AP Digital costs, but whatever it is, it&#039;s probably out of the financial reach of most bloggers. However, I&#039;m sure many bloggers would be willing to pay a reasonable amount to legally use AP content. Maybe AP and the Media Bloggers Association can cut a deal where members in good standing can legally access AP content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AP is now in the business of marketing many of its services, why not create affordable blogger accounts. iTunes and other music pay sites figured out a way for people to buy instead of illegally download music. I did a very quick check on the AP website and came across this on its FAQ page</p>
<p>&#8221; How can I become a member of The Associated Press and receive AP services?<br />
If you are a newspaper, radio or television station, you can become a member of the AP cooperative. </p>
<p>If you are not a member of The Associated Press, but want to receive AP news for your Web site or wireless service, company intranet, desktop or other interactive application, you can contact AP Digital. &#8221;</p>
<p>Not sure how much AP Digital costs, but whatever it is, it&#8217;s probably out of the financial reach of most bloggers. However, I&#8217;m sure many bloggers would be willing to pay a reasonable amount to legally use AP content. Maybe AP and the Media Bloggers Association can cut a deal where members in good standing can legally access AP content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links - 20th June 2008 &#171; Curiously Persistent</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-377720</link>
		<dc:creator>Links - 20th June 2008 &#171; Curiously Persistent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-377720</guid>
		<description>[...] How to fix the mess the Associated Press have created (Jeff Jarvis) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How to fix the mess the Associated Press have created (Jeff Jarvis) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daylife in the news</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-377708</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daylife in the news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-377708</guid>
		<description>[...] my fuller disclosure at the end of this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my fuller disclosure at the end of this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis - Should news agencies limit the content bloggers can excerpt from their articles?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-377666</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis - Should news agencies limit the content bloggers can excerpt from their articles?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-377666</guid>
		<description>[...] I will say again that the AP should start using our linking and quoting guidelines rather than its homogenization [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I will say again that the AP should start using our linking and quoting guidelines rather than its homogenization [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis sobre la ética de los enlaces y las fuentes &#187; eCuaderno</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-377653</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis sobre la ética de los enlaces y las fuentes &#187; eCuaderno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-377653</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis: A proposal to the Associated Press: A link ethic   &#160;Imprimir este post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis: A proposal to the Associated Press: A link ethic   &nbsp;Imprimir este post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Enator</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-377633</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Enator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-377633</guid>
		<description>What this looks more and more like is that the AP considers that they are entitled to &quot;Own the news&quot;, not just the expression of the news but the &quot;facts of the day&quot; or as AP&#039;s chief strategist called it &quot;conversation of the day&quot; as well.

AP is trying to strong arm and coerce bloggers, the aggregators and online news into accepting terms that no court would ever grant them. The AP is probably willing to bet that not too many people have the resources or willingness to mount a defense.

No doubt about it.. they consider this an end game play</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What this looks more and more like is that the AP considers that they are entitled to &#8220;Own the news&#8221;, not just the expression of the news but the &#8220;facts of the day&#8221; or as AP&#8217;s chief strategist called it &#8220;conversation of the day&#8221; as well.</p>
<p>AP is trying to strong arm and coerce bloggers, the aggregators and online news into accepting terms that no court would ever grant them. The AP is probably willing to bet that not too many people have the resources or willingness to mount a defense.</p>
<p>No doubt about it.. they consider this an end game play</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hey, Saul</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-377589</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hey, Saul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-377589</guid>
		<description>[...] would have appreciated it very much if Saul had noticed my efforts at conversation namely this post in which I tried to explain to the AP our ethic of the link and suggest that they try it on. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would have appreciated it very much if Saul had noticed my efforts at conversation namely this post in which I tried to explain to the AP our ethic of the link and suggest that they try it on. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weblogg-ed &#187; Blogging Ethics</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-377575</link>
		<dc:creator>Weblogg-ed &#187; Blogging Ethics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-377575</guid>
		<description>[...] a quick pointer to a post by Jeff Jarvis who has some interesting observations about blogging ethics in the context of linking and quoting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a quick pointer to a post by Jeff Jarvis who has some interesting observations about blogging ethics in the context of linking and quoting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earth To Aspiring Pundits: There Is No Such Thing As A Free Lunch In The Blogosphere . . .</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-377569</link>
		<dc:creator>Earth To Aspiring Pundits: There Is No Such Thing As A Free Lunch In The Blogosphere . . .</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-377569</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis in the majority, although Jeff later more or less came to his senses and is now proposing a link ethic between the AP and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis in the majority, although Jeff later more or less came to his senses and is now proposing a link ethic between the AP and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP kerfuffle continues</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-377562</link>
		<dc:creator>AP kerfuffle continues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-377562</guid>
		<description>[...] then Jarvis, in his proposed link ethic for AP, speaks very highly of them: Now let me make clear that the AP is no idiot. Jim Kennedy, its head [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] then Jarvis, in his proposed link ethic for AP, speaks very highly of them: Now let me make clear that the AP is no idiot. Jim Kennedy, its head [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Printed Matters &#187; AP&#8217;s online business model is completely wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/06/14/a-proposal-to-the-associated-press-a-link-ethic/#comment-377559</link>
		<dc:creator>Printed Matters &#187; AP&#8217;s online business model is completely wrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 02:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3670#comment-377559</guid>
		<description>[...] I want news organizations to practice link journalism and get rid of the churnalism. And I want to support original journalism at its source, since that is how it will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I want news organizations to practice link journalism and get rid of the churnalism. And I want to support original journalism at its source, since that is how it will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

