<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new news mindset</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/11/30/the-new-news-mindset/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/11/30/the-new-news-mindset/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:27:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » The new news mindset &#124; Hitstopz</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/11/30/the-new-news-mindset/#comment-386350</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » The new news mindset &#124; Hitstopz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3891#comment-386350</guid>
		<description>[...] the original: BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » The new news mindset   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original: BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » The new news mindset   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veckan som gick - vecka 48 at Same Same But Different</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/11/30/the-new-news-mindset/#comment-386343</link>
		<dc:creator>Veckan som gick - vecka 48 at Same Same But Different</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3891#comment-386343</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Jeff Jarvis hittar vi Chuck Peters, VD för ett medieföretag som möter det nya medielandskapet på ett lokalt plan. Han skriver om behovet att förändra utgångspunkten innan man kan förändra själva metodiken och det är inte utan att vi båda känner igen oss i detta:  As we work to develop this new game, or business model, within our own company, conflicts arise. Those who see the future, but can’t articulate it, are frustrated. Those who see the future and want to make it happen quickly are very frustrated by those who don’t even perceive the need for a new game. Those who don’t perceive the need for a new game are frustrated by all the commotion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Jeff Jarvis hittar vi Chuck Peters, VD för ett medieföretag som möter det nya medielandskapet på ett lokalt plan. Han skriver om behovet att förändra utgångspunkten innan man kan förändra själva metodiken och det är inte utan att vi båda känner igen oss i detta:  As we work to develop this new game, or business model, within our own company, conflicts arise. Those who see the future, but can’t articulate it, are frustrated. Those who see the future and want to make it happen quickly are very frustrated by those who don’t even perceive the need for a new game. Those who don’t perceive the need for a new game are frustrated by all the commotion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/11/30/the-new-news-mindset/#comment-386339</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 21:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3891#comment-386339</guid>
		<description>Si,

Absolutely. Just to reiterate, here&#039;s what I said in a post about new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/11/24/a-scenario-for-news/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new scenarios for news&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Note well that none of this is new. The essential functions of journalism - reporting, watching, sharing, answering, explaining - and its verities - factualness, completeness, fairness, timeliness, relevance - are eternal, but the means of performing them are multiplying magnificently. That is why I so enjoy teaching journalism, because we need no longer pick a medium and its tools for a career but can select them every time we need to tell a story - and because journalism is no longer about preservation (it never should have been) but is instead about change and growth.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Si,</p>
<p>Absolutely. Just to reiterate, here&#8217;s what I said in a post about new <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/11/24/a-scenario-for-news/" rel="nofollow">new scenarios for news</a>: &#8220;Note well that none of this is new. The essential functions of journalism &#8211; reporting, watching, sharing, answering, explaining &#8211; and its verities &#8211; factualness, completeness, fairness, timeliness, relevance &#8211; are eternal, but the means of performing them are multiplying magnificently. That is why I so enjoy teaching journalism, because we need no longer pick a medium and its tools for a career but can select them every time we need to tell a story &#8211; and because journalism is no longer about preservation (it never should have been) but is instead about change and growth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Si</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/11/30/the-new-news-mindset/#comment-386338</link>
		<dc:creator>Si</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 21:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=3891#comment-386338</guid>
		<description>One thing concerning me is the current over-emphasis given to adapting to the &#039;new&#039; at the detriment of fundamental news values. Industry commentators (yourself included) are understandably keen to promote the various ways in which news organisations need to evolve in order to survive the current digital revolution. But surely the importance of old school, bread and butter journalism standards like accuracy, thorough investigation and wise editorial judgement still need to be highlighted? Sacrificing accuracy for speed seems to be of particular relevance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing concerning me is the current over-emphasis given to adapting to the &#8216;new&#8217; at the detriment of fundamental news values. Industry commentators (yourself included) are understandably keen to promote the various ways in which news organisations need to evolve in order to survive the current digital revolution. But surely the importance of old school, bread and butter journalism standards like accuracy, thorough investigation and wise editorial judgement still need to be highlighted? Sacrificing accuracy for speed seems to be of particular relevance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

