<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google gets out of print</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/01/21/google-gets-out-of-print/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/01/21/google-gets-out-of-print/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Altman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/01/21/google-gets-out-of-print/#comment-389745</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Altman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 07:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4047#comment-389745</guid>
		<description>I wished we&#039;d get working on a deal to have Google help newspapers sell their online too.  The print will be what the print will be - lets not let the print bring down the online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wished we&#8217;d get working on a deal to have Google help newspapers sell their online too.  The print will be what the print will be &#8211; lets not let the print bring down the online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael J</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/01/21/google-gets-out-of-print/#comment-389693</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4047#comment-389693</guid>
		<description>Nice. I&#039;m thinking that when the AP faces the fact that selling content to fill the news hole just ain&#039;t going to hack it, they might give you a call to discuss ad networks.  Google will probably re enter the field and do the deal with freebies and local shoppers. Most of them get it much better than the &quot;NEWSPAPERS.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. I&#8217;m thinking that when the AP faces the fact that selling content to fill the news hole just ain&#8217;t going to hack it, they might give you a call to discuss ad networks.  Google will probably re enter the field and do the deal with freebies and local shoppers. Most of them get it much better than the &#8220;NEWSPAPERS.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

