<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian column: Whack-a-mole with micropayments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Notes on Nicholas Carr &#124; Hypercrit</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-401985</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes on Nicholas Carr &#124; Hypercrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-401985</guid>
		<description>[...] dis­misses writ­ers like Clay Shirky and Jeff Jarvis, who argue that some­thing has changed sig­nif­i­cantly and irre­versibly about the way [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dis­misses writ­ers like Clay Shirky and Jeff Jarvis, who argue that some­thing has changed sig­nif­i­cantly and irre­versibly about the way [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warum Bezahlinhalte nicht funktionieren : lektroliv.com</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-396827</link>
		<dc:creator>Warum Bezahlinhalte nicht funktionieren : lektroliv.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-396827</guid>
		<description>[...] seine Inhalte erst hinter einer Bezahlwand zugänglich macht, schließt die Suchmaschinen aus. Dabei ist besonders Google wichtig für die Zugriffe auf jedes Medienangebot, egal ob [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seine Inhalte erst hinter einer Bezahlwand zugänglich macht, schließt die Suchmaschinen aus. Dabei ist besonders Google wichtig für die Zugriffe auf jedes Medienangebot, egal ob [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nachrichtengeschäft im Internet: Warum Bezahlinhalte nicht funktionieren » netzwertig.com</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-395919</link>
		<dc:creator>Nachrichtengeschäft im Internet: Warum Bezahlinhalte nicht funktionieren » netzwertig.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-395919</guid>
		<description>[...] seine Inhalte erst hinter einer Bezahlwand zugänglich macht, schließt die Suchmaschinen aus. Dabei ist besonders Google wichtig für die Zugriffe auf jedes Medienangebot, egal ob [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seine Inhalte erst hinter einer Bezahlwand zugänglich macht, schließt die Suchmaschinen aus. Dabei ist besonders Google wichtig für die Zugriffe auf jedes Medienangebot, egal ob [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 'American Idol': Micropayment Model? &#124; BNET Intercom &#124; BNET</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-394881</link>
		<dc:creator>'American Idol': Micropayment Model? &#124; BNET Intercom &#124; BNET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-394881</guid>
		<description>[...] payment scheme in a few weeks.  Yet new media pundits like Jeff Jarvis are still convinced that a micropayment system will never work for the news industry. People just won&#8217;t stop to pay a few cents to read a news story or gain access to a news site [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] payment scheme in a few weeks.  Yet new media pundits like Jeff Jarvis are still convinced that a micropayment system will never work for the news industry. People just won&#8217;t stop to pay a few cents to read a news story or gain access to a news site [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Positive Invoice Finance</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-394480</link>
		<dc:creator>Positive Invoice Finance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 09:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-394480</guid>
		<description>he content is free, but readers pay for increased access to and interaction with journalists. It’s freemium news: free content, premium services on top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he content is free, but readers pay for increased access to and interaction with journalists. It’s freemium news: free content, premium services on top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LSDI : Chi salverà i giornali? Ecco i business model possibili</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-394402</link>
		<dc:creator>LSDI : Chi salverà i giornali? Ecco i business model possibili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-394402</guid>
		<description>[...] trovare una soluzione all&#8217;impasse attuale: iper-locale, metro paper e contenuti a pagamento.   Jarvis ha pi&#249; volte espresso la sua perplessit&#224; sulla riuscita dei modelli a pagamento, e non &#232; il solo, sebbene vi siano pi&#249; voci a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] trovare una soluzione all&rsquo;impasse attuale: iper-locale, metro paper e contenuti a pagamento.   Jarvis ha pi&ugrave; volte espresso la sua perplessit&agrave; sulla riuscita dei modelli a pagamento, e non &egrave; il solo, sebbene vi siano pi&ugrave; voci a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Businessmodelle für Journalismus &#124; Björn Sievers</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-393345</link>
		<dc:creator>Businessmodelle für Journalismus &#124; Björn Sievers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-393345</guid>
		<description>[...] um Geschäftsmodelle für Journalismus. Schon seit Monaten sucht er nach Zahlen zu Bezahlmodellen (an die er bisher nicht glaubt). Jetzt gibt es ein Projekt an der CUNY Graduate School of Journalism, wo Jarvis unterrichtet. Bin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] um Geschäftsmodelle für Journalismus. Schon seit Monaten sucht er nach Zahlen zu Bezahlmodellen (an die er bisher nicht glaubt). Jetzt gibt es ein Projekt an der CUNY Graduate School of Journalism, wo Jarvis unterrichtet. Bin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewBizNews: Paid content models &#171; BuzzMachine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-393310</link>
		<dc:creator>NewBizNews: Paid content models &#171; BuzzMachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-393310</guid>
		<description>[...] let me be clear that I have been skeptical about the prospects of charging for content online (here&#8217;s my reasoning). Here&#8217;s Clay Shirky&#8217;s more eloquent argument. Others believe that charging for content [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] let me be clear that I have been skeptical about the prospects of charging for content online (here&#8217;s my reasoning). Here&#8217;s Clay Shirky&#8217;s more eloquent argument. Others believe that charging for content [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pagar por contenidos en internet y el futuro de los periódicos &#124; Amuzigi.com</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-391923</link>
		<dc:creator>Pagar por contenidos en internet y el futuro de los periódicos &#124; Amuzigi.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-391923</guid>
		<description>[...] cobrar por contenidos en la web de hoy, con Nick Carr empeñado en buscar fórmulas y otros como Jarvis o Clay Shirky rebatiendo cada una.  Las tesis de Carr y otros sobre como podrá hacer negocio la [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cobrar por contenidos en la web de hoy, con Nick Carr empeñado en buscar fórmulas y otros como Jarvis o Clay Shirky rebatiendo cada una.  Las tesis de Carr y otros sobre como podrá hacer negocio la [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If you&#8217;re still thinking about charging for online news in 2009, you&#8217;re dead already (a primer) &#124; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-391750</link>
		<dc:creator>If you&#8217;re still thinking about charging for online news in 2009, you&#8217;re dead already (a primer) &#124; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-391750</guid>
		<description>[...] From Jeff Jarvis: &#8220;Micropayments have never been shown to work except when distribution is tightly controlled (see: mobile phones and iTunes). Subscriptions have been abandoned by The New York Times and others because the costs, enumerated above, are too high. A newspaper cartel is an oxymoron, as publishers have never shown the ability to self-organize (the last attempt in the U.S., the New Century Network, was a flaming disaster). Charities are lovely, but even the Scott Trust that generously supports this newspaper rose not out of pure altruism but out of a need to avoid inheritance taxes that would have forced a sale. Government support has been discussed in these pages but I, for one, am fearful of the notion of the prey feeding the watchdogs. The Kindle is cool but has a tiny audience.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From Jeff Jarvis: &#8220;Micropayments have never been shown to work except when distribution is tightly controlled (see: mobile phones and iTunes). Subscriptions have been abandoned by The New York Times and others because the costs, enumerated above, are too high. A newspaper cartel is an oxymoron, as publishers have never shown the ability to self-organize (the last attempt in the U.S., the New Century Network, was a flaming disaster). Charities are lovely, but even the Scott Trust that generously supports this newspaper rose not out of pure altruism but out of a need to avoid inheritance taxes that would have forced a sale. Government support has been discussed in these pages but I, for one, am fearful of the notion of the prey feeding the watchdogs. The Kindle is cool but has a tiny audience.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conspiring to death &#171; BuzzMachine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-391539</link>
		<dc:creator>Conspiring to death &#171; BuzzMachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-391539</guid>
		<description>[...] person - and find out why your own friggin&#8217; paper made its own good economic decisions to stop charging?!?); and kissing off the aggregators (hey, David, can you imagine what would happen to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] person &#8211; and find out why your own friggin&#8217; paper made its own good economic decisions to stop charging?!?); and kissing off the aggregators (hey, David, can you imagine what would happen to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technically Philly &#187; Can the Philadelphia general interest newspaper thrive with technology? &#124; Covering the Community of People Who Use Technology in Philadelphia.</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-391352</link>
		<dc:creator>Technically Philly &#187; Can the Philadelphia general interest newspaper thrive with technology? &#124; Covering the Community of People Who Use Technology in Philadelphia.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-391352</guid>
		<description>[...] viewers, building brands and offering news around-the-clock. [Source]  Arguments continue to rage on micropayments and protected content, like Newsday&#8217;s recent announcement of its protection paywall. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] viewers, building brands and offering news around-the-clock. [Source]  Arguments continue to rage on micropayments and protected content, like Newsday&#8217;s recent announcement of its protection paywall. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-391278</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-391278</guid>
		<description>So does a newsstand. So does a printing company. So does the Post Office. So does FedEx. So does a store. So does a salesman. So?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does a newsstand. So does a printing company. So does the Post Office. So does FedEx. So does a store. So does a salesman. So?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-391277</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-391277</guid>
		<description>&quot;Newspapers should be grateful that Google doesn’t charge them for the value it shares in links and audience. Google is their generous, free newsstand. &quot;

But I think the larger point is that Google is always benefitting off the work of others with its search business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Newspapers should be grateful that Google doesn’t charge them for the value it shares in links and audience. Google is their generous, free newsstand. &#8221;</p>
<p>But I think the larger point is that Google is always benefitting off the work of others with its search business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veckan som gick - vecka 9 at Same Same But Different</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-391232</link>
		<dc:creator>Veckan som gick - vecka 9 at Same Same But Different</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 02:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-391232</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis tycker fortfarande att det är en dålig idé att ta betalt för nyheter, och han har goda argument: But online news is different for many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis tycker fortfarande att det är en dålig idé att ta betalt för nyheter, och han har goda argument: But online news is different for many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photomaniacal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jeff Jarvis whacks idea of press charging for content as a &#8216;waste of precious time&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-391133</link>
		<dc:creator>Photomaniacal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jeff Jarvis whacks idea of press charging for content as a &#8216;waste of precious time&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-391133</guid>
		<description>[...] new opportunities to transform journalism for a new age.&#8221;Full draft of Jarvis article is here   Please upgrade your browser   Tags: America, crisis, economy, Italy, Mexico, News, United States, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new opportunities to transform journalism for a new age.&#8221;Full draft of Jarvis article is here   Please upgrade your browser   Tags: America, crisis, economy, Italy, Mexico, News, United States, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-390979</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-390979</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;First, as soon as knowledge is known, it’s a commodity—and not a scarce one that can be controlled.&lt;/i&gt;

Tom Curley &amp; Co. are working on that problem, with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/22/AR2009022201243.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;hot news&quot; doctrine&lt;/a&gt; as their legal cudgel du jour.  Not that the AP will have any more luck with that than its other litigation tactics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>First, as soon as knowledge is known, it’s a commodity—and not a scarce one that can be controlled.</i></p>
<p>Tom Curley &amp; Co. are working on that problem, with the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/22/AR2009022201243.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;hot news&#8221; doctrine</a> as their legal cudgel du jour.  Not that the AP will have any more luck with that than its other litigation tactics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Young</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/02/23/guardian-column-whack-a-mole-with-micropayments/#comment-390966</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4250#comment-390966</guid>
		<description>There are too many pleas for rescue that appeal to the idea that news magically (morally!) deserves payment but ignore what we users of news really want. You want exploration of a new business model?

My sense is that real human potential for increased trust between journalists and their readers is one critical place to look for value. The idea? The content is free, but readers pay for increased access to and interaction with journalists. It’s freemium news: free content, premium services on top.

http://networkednews.wordpress.com/2009/02/11/no-micropayments-maybe-charity-yes-freemium-news/

Kindly recommended by Jay Rosen here:

http://twitter.com/jayrosen_nyu/status/1220179478</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are too many pleas for rescue that appeal to the idea that news magically (morally!) deserves payment but ignore what we users of news really want. You want exploration of a new business model?</p>
<p>My sense is that real human potential for increased trust between journalists and their readers is one critical place to look for value. The idea? The content is free, but readers pay for increased access to and interaction with journalists. It’s freemium news: free content, premium services on top.</p>
<p><a href="http://networkednews.wordpress.com/2009/02/11/no-micropayments-maybe-charity-yes-freemium-news/" rel="nofollow">http://networkednews.wordpress.com/2009/02/11/no-micropayments-maybe-charity-yes-freemium-news/</a></p>
<p>Kindly recommended by Jay Rosen here:</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/jayrosen_nyu/status/1220179478" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/jayrosen_nyu/status/1220179478</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

