Comments on: SXSW: Privacy (and publicness) http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/ by Jeff Jarvis Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:21:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: What Would A Pharma Marketing Champ Do? 9 Imperatives for 2010 | AdvanceMarketWoRx http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-453018 What Would A Pharma Marketing Champ Do? 9 Imperatives for 2010 | AdvanceMarketWoRx Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:29:36 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-453018 [...] more public you are, the easier you can be found, the more opportunities your have…(Read Privacy (and Publicness) by Jeff Jarvis Buzz [...] [...] more public you are, the easier you can be found, the more opportunities your have…(Read Privacy (and Publicness) by Jeff Jarvis Buzz [...]

]]> By: Marketers: What Would Google Do? Ten Imperatives for 2010 (part 2 of 4) | AdvanceMarketWoRx http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-453011 Marketers: What Would Google Do? Ten Imperatives for 2010 (part 2 of 4) | AdvanceMarketWoRx Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:34:29 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-453011 [...] content, Picasa for pictures, Google docs etc.4.    Cede control. Embrace ‘Publicness’ and openness. Transform your relationship with the public in every quarter in the organization. [...] [...] content, Picasa for pictures, Google docs etc.4.    Cede control. Embrace ‘Publicness’ and openness. Transform your relationship with the public in every quarter in the organization. [...]

]]> By: Mein Haus, meine Pixel: Privatsphäre bei Geodiensten | Blogs.Telekom http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-452948 Mein Haus, meine Pixel: Privatsphäre bei Geodiensten | Blogs.Telekom Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:17:08 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-452948 [...] Nutzern Möglichkeiten zur Kontrolle geben: „Es geht nicht um Privatsphäre. Es geht um Kontrolle!“ Ich denke, darum geht es: Die Branche muss die Bedürfnisse der Nutzer ernst nehmen und [...] [...] Nutzern Möglichkeiten zur Kontrolle geben: „Es geht nicht um Privatsphäre. Es geht um Kontrolle!“ Ich denke, darum geht es: Die Branche muss die Bedürfnisse der Nutzer ernst nehmen und [...]

]]> By: Very DRAFT Literary Review | goan food stories http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-447226 Very DRAFT Literary Review | goan food stories Sun, 03 Apr 2011 20:17:32 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-447226 [...] http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/ [...] [...] http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/ [...]

]]> By: Arne http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-424281 Arne Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:15:21 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-424281 I like the digital mirror quote. Nice article. From my point of view it is time consider what could happen. So far just a few institutions are using personal data for their purposes....but this is just the beginning I like the digital mirror quote. Nice article. From my point of view it is time consider what could happen. So far just a few institutions are using personal data for their purposes….but this is just the beginning

]]> By: 2010 – Halbzeit… | nickbohle.de http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-418646 2010 – Halbzeit… | nickbohle.de Sun, 18 Jul 2010 16:12:41 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-418646 [...] den ich die Kontrolle habe. Bei Mark Zuckerberg & Co. habe ich da meine Zweifel. Frei nach Jeff Jarvis: Privacy is not the issue. Control [...] [...] den ich die Kontrolle habe. Bei Mark Zuckerberg & Co. habe ich da meine Zweifel. Frei nach Jeff Jarvis: Privacy is not the issue. Control [...]

]]> By: SXSW: Privacy (and publicness) « BuzzMachine — artxtra.info http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-410484 SXSW: Privacy (and publicness) « BuzzMachine — artxtra.info Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:06:34 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-410484 [...] twitter rss SXSW: Privacy (and publicness) « BuzzMachine [...] [...] twitter rss SXSW: Privacy (and publicness) « BuzzMachine [...]

]]> By: Vers une vie privée en réseau | traffic-internet.net http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-410472 Vers une vie privée en réseau | traffic-internet.net Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:19:19 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-410472 [...] apprennent à faire avec. Citant David Weinberger, Jeff Jarvis estime ainsi qu’”une ère de la transparence doit aussi être une ère du pardon“. Encore faudrait-il peut-être plutôt parler, en l’espèce, de résilience, à savoir [...] [...] apprennent à faire avec. Citant David Weinberger, Jeff Jarvis estime ainsi qu’”une ère de la transparence doit aussi être une ère du pardon“. Encore faudrait-il peut-être plutôt parler, en l’espèce, de résilience, à savoir [...]

]]> By: The German privacy paradox « BuzzMachine http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-408715 The German privacy paradox « BuzzMachine Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:51:00 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-408715 [...] people are doing in excess in Facebook and the web? The issue, I’ve long said, is not privacy but control: We have a right to control our information and how it’s used. But all this talk about [...] [...] people are doing in excess in Facebook and the web? The issue, I’ve long said, is not privacy but control: We have a right to control our information and how it’s used. But all this talk about [...]

]]> By: What Would A Pharma Marketing Champ Do? 9 Imperatives for 2010 | Pharma Marketer http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-408371 What Would A Pharma Marketing Champ Do? 9 Imperatives for 2010 | Pharma Marketer Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:42:08 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-408371 [...] more public you are, the easier you can be found, the more opportunities your have…(Read Privacy (and Publicness) by Jeff Jarvis Buzz [...] [...] more public you are, the easier you can be found, the more opportunities your have…(Read Privacy (and Publicness) by Jeff Jarvis Buzz [...]

]]> By: Marketers: What Would Google Do? Ten Imperatives for 2010 (part 2 of 4) | Pharma Marketer http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-407054 Marketers: What Would Google Do? Ten Imperatives for 2010 (part 2 of 4) | Pharma Marketer Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:08:53 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-407054 [...] for publishing content, Picasa for pictures, Google docs etc. 4.    Cede control. Embrace ‘Publicness’ and openness. Transform your relationship with the public in every quarter in the organization. [...] [...] for publishing content, Picasa for pictures, Google docs etc. 4.    Cede control. Embrace ‘Publicness’ and openness. Transform your relationship with the public in every quarter in the organization. [...]

]]> By: The Paradox of Fake « Mark Slater’s Weblog http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-394335 The Paradox of Fake « Mark Slater’s Weblog Thu, 14 May 2009 13:01:10 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-394335 [...] we always have. We have just chosen to speak about privacy rather than our own level of publicness. read Jeff jarvis on the subject. This is a great article that truly captures this notion of publicness, and why statements like [...] [...] we always have. We have just chosen to speak about privacy rather than our own level of publicness. read Jeff jarvis on the subject. This is a great article that truly captures this notion of publicness, and why statements like [...]

]]> By: I am a Self-Made » How to SEO for Interaction Designers: Social Media Strategies: Requires Being Real http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-392384 I am a Self-Made » How to SEO for Interaction Designers: Social Media Strategies: Requires Being Real Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:13:37 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-392384 [...] Jeff Jarvis talks about transparency very well in this article. [...] [...] Jeff Jarvis talks about transparency very well in this article. [...]

]]> By: Privacy and Publicness « Privacy etc. http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-392221 Privacy and Publicness « Privacy etc. Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:57:17 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-392221 [...] SXSW: Privacy (and publicness) « BuzzMachine [...] [...] SXSW: Privacy (and publicness) « BuzzMachine [...]

]]> By: What will future genealogists and biographers find out about us? | Editor in the Trenches http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-391857 What will future genealogists and biographers find out about us? | Editor in the Trenches Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:33:30 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-391857 [...] (who of course attended the SXSW conference) pointed out that everything we do online builds a profile of who we are. It forces us to be transparent and honest, and it makes finding information about us [...] [...] (who of course attended the SXSW conference) pointed out that everything we do online builds a profile of who we are. It forces us to be transparent and honest, and it makes finding information about us [...]

]]> By: Top 10 Companies Most Discussed on Twitter at South by Southwest | Cision Blog http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-391844 Top 10 Companies Most Discussed on Twitter at South by Southwest | Cision Blog Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:56:09 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-391844 [...] SXSW: Privacy (and publicness) by Jeff Jarvis, Buzzmachine [...] [...] SXSW: Privacy (and publicness) by Jeff Jarvis, Buzzmachine [...]

]]> By: “Privacy is not the issue. Control is.” « David Hylander http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-391842 “Privacy is not the issue. Control is.” « David Hylander Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:34:54 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-391842 [...] (det är i själva verket ett utdrag från hans bok “What Would Google Do?”) om vad som händer med privatlivet på den sociala webben. Han ger en resonerande - och optimistisk - överblick av de ämnen som jag skrev om härom dagen, [...] [...] (det är i själva verket ett utdrag från hans bok “What Would Google Do?”) om vad som händer med privatlivet på den sociala webben. Han ger en resonerande – och optimistisk – överblick av de ämnen som jag skrev om härom dagen, [...]

]]> By: Carlos Rizo http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-391828 Carlos Rizo Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:38:49 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-391828 Mr. Jarvis, Enjoyed your book immensely and I "retwitted" it to my colleague Neil Seeman at the Health Strategy Innovation Cell in Toronto. On the topic of privacy, confidentiality, security and secrecy I took this picture http://twitpic.com/24h1o while in NYC. No matter how much we safeguard our information someone will always have a key... Mr. Jarvis,

Enjoyed your book immensely and I “retwitted” it to my colleague Neil Seeman at the Health Strategy Innovation Cell in Toronto.

On the topic of privacy, confidentiality, security and secrecy I took this picture http://twitpic.com/24h1o while in NYC.

No matter how much we safeguard our information someone will always have a key…

]]> By: slewfootsnoop http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-391814 slewfootsnoop Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:55:30 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-391814 Google isn't changing 'our societies, our lives, our relationships, our worldviews, probably even our brains in ways we can only begin to calculate'. All it has done is allow us access (in our homes) to a kind of hybrid public library/archive, the likes of which we've had access to for many years. The content may be greater (and more personal, in some regards), but the principal is the same - the same as it's been since Domesday. But more, the 'lasting connectedness' you describe is only relevant where people are willing to share true information about themselves on social nets and the like, while using their 'real' names as reference points. The reality is that many of 'Generation G' are already taking measures to protect their privacy from those they would rather didn't get in touch with them now, or in future. Check how many people set their age on Myspace (or etc.) to 101 - to avoid the attentions of spammers and lurkers. Check how many people use tags rather than their real names. The ability to 'block' or mislead unwanted intrusion is available on pretty much any social app I can think of. Privacy may well change in time, but it won't be 'because' of Google, or any other search engine or social net. Privacy has meant different things to different cultures at different times in history - due to a range of culturally specific factors. And ultimately, if people aren't happy with the privacy afforded them by a piece of online software, they will apply their wits to bending the rules, and making technology do their bidding on their terms - just as they've always done. Google isn’t changing ‘our societies, our lives, our relationships, our worldviews, probably even our brains in ways we can only begin to calculate’.

All it has done is allow us access (in our homes) to a kind of hybrid public library/archive, the likes of which we’ve had access to for many years.

The content may be greater (and more personal, in some regards), but the principal is the same – the same as it’s been since Domesday.

But more, the ‘lasting connectedness’ you describe is only relevant where people are willing to share true information about themselves on social nets and the like, while using their ‘real’ names as reference points.

The reality is that many of ‘Generation G’ are already taking measures to protect their privacy from those they would rather didn’t get in touch with them now, or in future.

Check how many people set their age on Myspace (or etc.) to 101 – to avoid the attentions of spammers and lurkers. Check how many people use tags rather than their real names.

The ability to ‘block’ or mislead unwanted intrusion is available on pretty much any social app I can think of.

Privacy may well change in time, but it won’t be ‘because’ of Google, or any other search engine or social net.

Privacy has meant different things to different cultures at different times in history – due to a range of culturally specific factors.

And ultimately, if people aren’t happy with the privacy afforded them by a piece of online software, they will apply their wits to bending the rules, and making technology do their bidding on their terms – just as they’ve always done.

]]> By: Geoff Jones » Accidental successes http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-391812 Geoff Jones » Accidental successes Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:54:54 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-391812 [...] clips from Jeff Jarvis which I totally agree [...] [...] clips from Jeff Jarvis which I totally agree [...]

]]> By: Bill Thompson http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-391806 Bill Thompson Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:45:58 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-391806 I gave a talk at Lift09 - the Death of Privacy and why we should welcome it... going for the radical approach.. http://www.thebillblog.com/billblog/index.php/2009/02/27/lift09/ Glad you're having fun down there I gave a talk at Lift09 – the Death of Privacy and why we should welcome it… going for the radical approach..

http://www.thebillblog.com/billblog/index.php/2009/02/27/lift09/

Glad you’re having fun down there

]]> By: Matt W http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/14/sxsw-privacy-and-publicness/#comment-391803 Matt W Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:02:04 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4385#comment-391803 Just FYI, I heard Siva say it was a myth he wished to explode that privacy is a currency that can be broken up and traded away. -M Just FYI, I heard Siva say it was a myth he wished to explode that privacy is a currency that can be broken up and traded away.

-M

]]>