<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David, meet Goliath</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Medford</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/#comment-459959</link>
		<dc:creator>Medford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4846#comment-459959</guid>
		<description>I could watch Schdilenr&#039;s List and still be happy after reading this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could watch Schdilenr&#8217;s List and still be happy after reading this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/#comment-396329</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4846#comment-396329</guid>
		<description>Cut it out, please. Or I will. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cut it out, please. Or I will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Manitoba</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/#comment-396325</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Manitoba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4846#comment-396325</guid>
		<description>Hi, Deez! Do you and Andy Freeman take turns feeding your bloated canards?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Deez! Do you and Andy Freeman take turns feeding your bloated canards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laid Off Too</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/#comment-396301</link>
		<dc:creator>Laid Off Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4846#comment-396301</guid>
		<description>Sorry should&#039;ve been New Yorker article inside Charles&#039; excellent article. I guess I&#039;d be a real hypocrite if I complained about media accuracy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry should&#8217;ve been New Yorker article inside Charles&#8217; excellent article. I guess I&#8217;d be a real hypocrite if I complained about media accuracy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laid Off Too</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/#comment-396300</link>
		<dc:creator>Laid Off Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4846#comment-396300</guid>
		<description>Thanks for refering me to the New Yotker article Jeff. It was very insightful. Keep up the thought provoking posts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for refering me to the New Yotker article Jeff. It was very insightful. Keep up the thought provoking posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deez</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/#comment-396295</link>
		<dc:creator>Deez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4846#comment-396295</guid>
		<description>If you want to battle Goliath (NY TImes) their way?  Put on glasses that only let you see one side of the political spectrum, write stories, even if fake or unsubstantiated, and watch your readers and viewers flee.

The blogs most definitely should not fight the Goliath&#039;s their way.  They&#039;ll run themselves out of business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to battle Goliath (NY TImes) their way?  Put on glasses that only let you see one side of the political spectrum, write stories, even if fake or unsubstantiated, and watch your readers and viewers flee.</p>
<p>The blogs most definitely should not fight the Goliath&#8217;s their way.  They&#8217;ll run themselves out of business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/#comment-396291</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4846#comment-396291</guid>
		<description>Absolutely. That&#039;s why the connections among people and identity and reputation matter and that&#039;s why there are opportunities in curation and education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. That&#8217;s why the connections among people and identity and reputation matter and that&#8217;s why there are opportunities in curation and education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/#comment-396281</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4846#comment-396281</guid>
		<description>Be concerned about whatever you&#039;d like.

However, the alternative to process journalism isn&#039;t perfection, but &quot;get it right&quot; journalism, which is a disaster.  Process journalism can be pretty bad and still be significantly better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be concerned about whatever you&#8217;d like.</p>
<p>However, the alternative to process journalism isn&#8217;t perfection, but &#8220;get it right&#8221; journalism, which is a disaster.  Process journalism can be pretty bad and still be significantly better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Manitoba</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/#comment-396279</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Manitoba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4846#comment-396279</guid>
		<description>An honest question:

Should we be concerned about a potential weakness of &quot;process journalism&quot; -- that it can sometimes be mistakenly (or destructively) used to excuse lazy or perhaps even nonexistent investigation, that as long as you get it right eventually it doesn&#039;t matter how poor your original report was? 

Or am I worried about nothing? I really hope it&#039;s the latter, so I can save my antacid money for a Disney World vacation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An honest question:</p>
<p>Should we be concerned about a potential weakness of &#8220;process journalism&#8221; &#8212; that it can sometimes be mistakenly (or destructively) used to excuse lazy or perhaps even nonexistent investigation, that as long as you get it right eventually it doesn&#8217;t matter how poor your original report was? </p>
<p>Or am I worried about nothing? I really hope it&#8217;s the latter, so I can save my antacid money for a Disney World vacation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Media Daily - Link Edition Wednesday June 10, 2009 &#124; Reinventing Yourself...</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/#comment-396273</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Media Daily - Link Edition Wednesday June 10, 2009 &#124; Reinventing Yourself...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4846#comment-396273</guid>
		<description>[...] David, meet Goliath [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David, meet Goliath [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/#comment-396272</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4846#comment-396272</guid>
		<description>&quot;How David beats Goliath&quot;
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/05/11/090511fa_fact_gladwell?currentPage=all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How David beats Goliath&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/05/11/090511fa_fact_gladwell?currentPage=all" rel="nofollow">http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/05/11/090511fa_fact_gladwell?currentPage=all</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/#comment-396269</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4846#comment-396269</guid>
		<description>Aw, you&#039;re just saying that.

(Yes, the hiphop sampling thing would have brought out the copyright arguments. You don&#039;t want that.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw, you&#8217;re just saying that.</p>
<p>(Yes, the hiphop sampling thing would have brought out the copyright arguments. You don&#8217;t want that.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/10/4846/#comment-396266</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4846#comment-396266</guid>
		<description>The other comparison that did occur to me, but I thought the post was getting too long, was peoples&#039; attitude to hip-hop/rap. &quot;Call that music? You&#039;re just using other peoples&#039; music and doing that whip-whipp sound with the record deck! You haven&#039;t created anything yourself, you&#039;re just talking over the top!&quot;

Though in retrospect it&#039;s probably apposite.

I thought it was a clever comment. Very interweb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other comparison that did occur to me, but I thought the post was getting too long, was peoples&#8217; attitude to hip-hop/rap. &#8220;Call that music? You&#8217;re just using other peoples&#8217; music and doing that whip-whipp sound with the record deck! You haven&#8217;t created anything yourself, you&#8217;re just talking over the top!&#8221;</p>
<p>Though in retrospect it&#8217;s probably apposite.</p>
<p>I thought it was a clever comment. Very interweb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

