<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Posner&#8217;s dangerous thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:21:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ooqksbx</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-469341</link>
		<dc:creator>ooqksbx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-469341</guid>
		<description>Y2n03m  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ihmqgnrizvxg.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ihmqgnrizvxg&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y2n03m  <a href="http://ihmqgnrizvxg.com/" rel="nofollow">ihmqgnrizvxg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raul</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-469253</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-469253</guid>
		<description>3 thgins I love about summer:  my feet in the sand at the beach, flip flops, and playing with my girls in the water!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 thgins I love about summer:  my feet in the sand at the beach, flip flops, and playing with my girls in the water!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankita</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-469146</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-469146</guid>
		<description>Sounds good, but do you rlaely believe they are capping at 1,000? Sounds like a sales gimmick to me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good, but do you rlaely believe they are capping at 1,000? Sounds like a sales gimmick to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge Posner: Ban Linking to save newspapers</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-452960</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge Posner: Ban Linking to save newspapers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-452960</guid>
		<description>[...] others like Jeff Jarvis and Stowe Boyd have already done a good job off ridiculing the thought that the banning of links is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] others like Jeff Jarvis and Stowe Boyd have already done a good job off ridiculing the thought that the banning of links is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future of Newspapers &#171; blogs.independent.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-415017</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Newspapers &#171; blogs.independent.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 18:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-415017</guid>
		<description>[...] have seeded the map with arguments raised by, among others, Clay Shirky, Richard Posner, Jeff Jarvis, Roy Greenslade, Howard Kurtz, and The Independent&apos;s own Gavin O&#8217;Reilly; however, as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have seeded the map with arguments raised by, among others, Clay Shirky, Richard Posner, Jeff Jarvis, Roy Greenslade, Howard Kurtz, and The Independent&apos;s own Gavin O&rsquo;Reilly; however, as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should linking be illegal? &#171; Brand Newz</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-400396</link>
		<dc:creator>Should linking be illegal? &#171; Brand Newz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-400396</guid>
		<description>[...] notion set off an eruption from the likes of Jeff Jarvis, Matt Welch and Erick Schonfeld, among others. And they are right to be furious. Not only would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] notion set off an eruption from the likes of Jeff Jarvis, Matt Welch and Erick Schonfeld, among others. And they are right to be furious. Not only would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denisjh</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-399876</link>
		<dc:creator>Denisjh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-399876</guid>
		<description>The posting oddly fails to dispute a word Posner says.
If no one pays for content, no one will make content. 
If people pay a fortune for content, lots of people will make content.
There is no infotopia in which the AP will continue to hand out its content and free riders will be able to make money off of it without paying AP.
Until someone explains to me who will invest their time and money into creating content when distributors refuse (in a high-minded way, of course) to pay for it, I&#039;m on Posner&#039;s side.
Besides, he is waaaaaay smarter than the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The posting oddly fails to dispute a word Posner says.<br />
If no one pays for content, no one will make content.<br />
If people pay a fortune for content, lots of people will make content.<br />
There is no infotopia in which the AP will continue to hand out its content and free riders will be able to make money off of it without paying AP.<br />
Until someone explains to me who will invest their time and money into creating content when distributors refuse (in a high-minded way, of course) to pay for it, I&#8217;m on Posner&#8217;s side.<br />
Besides, he is waaaaaay smarter than the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis: How (and why) to replace the AP &#187; A Couple Things &#187; A couple things about politics, sports, travel, and other stuff.</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-398463</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis: How (and why) to replace the AP &#187; A Couple Things &#187; A couple things about politics, sports, travel, and other stuff.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-398463</guid>
		<description>[...] has been much stupidity lately about how news should operate in the ecosystem in the internet - threats to try to extend copyright, the ominously named and ambiguously written Hamburg Declaration, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been much stupidity lately about how news should operate in the ecosystem in the internet &#8211; threats to try to extend copyright, the ominously named and ambiguously written Hamburg Declaration, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How (and why) to replace the AP &#171; BuzzMachine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-398453</link>
		<dc:creator>How (and why) to replace the AP &#171; BuzzMachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-398453</guid>
		<description>[...] been much stupidity lately about how news should operate in the ecosystem in the internet &#8211; threats to try to extend copyright, the ominously named and ambiguously written Hamburg Declaration, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been much stupidity lately about how news should operate in the ecosystem in the internet &#8211; threats to try to extend copyright, the ominously named and ambiguously written Hamburg Declaration, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free! to the South West &#171; Paperhouse</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397712</link>
		<dc:creator>Free! to the South West &#171; Paperhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397712</guid>
		<description>[...] from summarising and linking to its contents (a technique that&#8217;s recently been given a speculative legal outing in the States) is simply asinine, entirely missing the operation of the link economy online and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from summarising and linking to its contents (a technique that&#8217;s recently been given a speculative legal outing in the States) is simply asinine, entirely missing the operation of the link economy online and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should linking be illegal? &#171; Therearenosunglasses&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397551</link>
		<dc:creator>Should linking be illegal? &#171; Therearenosunglasses&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397551</guid>
		<description>[...] notion set off an eruption from the likes of Jeff Jarvis, Matt Welch and Erick Schonfeld, among others. And they are right to be furious. Not only would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] notion set off an eruption from the likes of Jeff Jarvis, Matt Welch and Erick Schonfeld, among others. And they are right to be furious. Not only would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Should linking be illegal?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397542</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Should linking be illegal?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397542</guid>
		<description>[...] notion set off an eruption from the likes of Jeff Jarvis, Matt Welch and Erick Schonfeld, among others. And they are right to be furious. Not only would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] notion set off an eruption from the likes of Jeff Jarvis, Matt Welch and Erick Schonfeld, among others. And they are right to be furious. Not only would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: statism watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Should linking be illegal?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397516</link>
		<dc:creator>statism watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Should linking be illegal?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397516</guid>
		<description>[...] notion set off an eruption from the likes of Jeff Jarvis, Matt Welch and Erick Schonfeld, among others. And they are right to be furious. Not only would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] notion set off an eruption from the likes of Jeff Jarvis, Matt Welch and Erick Schonfeld, among others. And they are right to be furious. Not only would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wardman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397479</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wardman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397479</guid>
		<description>Torsten

Following up on this one. I disagree in that the &quot;eClipsWeb&quot; licence applies to NLA members who circulate links to newspaper articles to their clients, and that is more than just the &quot;aggregators&quot; such as Moreover. My exact wording:

&quot;NLA managing director David Pugh today confirmed the introduction of the new licence extension governing weblinks.

He told Press Gazette that the licence was intended to apply only to organisations circulating hyperlinks to newspaper articles commercially as part of a business model.

There is no attempt to regulate use of hyperlinks where that is not as part of a chargeable service, such as by private individuals or as the results of queries by internet search engines such as Google News.

He said licensing will also apply to recipients of paid media monitoring services, as is the case with existing NLA licences.&quot;

Was emailed to the NLA PR people and verified. I read that as meaning that the &quot;link licence&quot; would also apply to existing customers who were sending links rather than digital cuttings to existing clients.

Indeed, the NLA Press Release says that this is so:

&quot;From September 2009, web aggregators that charge clients for their services will require a NLA licence and be charged from January 2010, The press cuttings agencies that either ‘scrape’ content themselves or buy in services from aggregators will also be licensed and charged. Client companies that receive &amp; forward links from these commercial aggregators within their organisation will also require a licence.&quot;

Link: http://www.nla.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=6&amp;Itemid=7

Hope that helps answer your query.

Rgds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Torsten</p>
<p>Following up on this one. I disagree in that the &#8220;eClipsWeb&#8221; licence applies to NLA members who circulate links to newspaper articles to their clients, and that is more than just the &#8220;aggregators&#8221; such as Moreover. My exact wording:</p>
<p>&#8220;NLA managing director David Pugh today confirmed the introduction of the new licence extension governing weblinks.</p>
<p>He told Press Gazette that the licence was intended to apply only to organisations circulating hyperlinks to newspaper articles commercially as part of a business model.</p>
<p>There is no attempt to regulate use of hyperlinks where that is not as part of a chargeable service, such as by private individuals or as the results of queries by internet search engines such as Google News.</p>
<p>He said licensing will also apply to recipients of paid media monitoring services, as is the case with existing NLA licences.&#8221;</p>
<p>Was emailed to the NLA PR people and verified. I read that as meaning that the &#8220;link licence&#8221; would also apply to existing customers who were sending links rather than digital cuttings to existing clients.</p>
<p>Indeed, the NLA Press Release says that this is so:</p>
<p>&#8220;From September 2009, web aggregators that charge clients for their services will require a NLA licence and be charged from January 2010, The press cuttings agencies that either ‘scrape’ content themselves or buy in services from aggregators will also be licensed and charged. Client companies that receive &amp; forward links from these commercial aggregators within their organisation will also require a licence.&#8221;</p>
<p>Link: <a href="http://www.nla.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=6&amp;Itemid=7" rel="nofollow">http://www.nla.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=6&amp;Itemid=7</a></p>
<p>Hope that helps answer your query.</p>
<p>Rgds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fight Over &#8216;Free&#8217; - The Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397445</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fight Over &#8216;Free&#8217; - The Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397445</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Good god,&#8221; responded the future-positive Internet enthusiast Jeff Jarvis. Posner’s thinking is incomplete in a few ways. First, he is ignorant of the imperatives of the link economy. The links and discussion he wants to outlaw is precisely how content is distributed and value is added to it in the new media economy. . . . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Good god,&#8221; responded the future-positive Internet enthusiast Jeff Jarvis. Posner’s thinking is incomplete in a few ways. First, he is ignorant of the imperatives of the link economy. The links and discussion he wants to outlaw is precisely how content is distributed and value is added to it in the new media economy. . . . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wading Into the Posner/Hot News/Linking Brouhaha &#124; Weight Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397437</link>
		<dc:creator>Wading Into the Posner/Hot News/Linking Brouhaha &#124; Weight Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397437</guid>
		<description>[...] TechDirt criticized the conclusion, as did Jeff Jarvis. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechDirt criticized the conclusion, as did Jeff Jarvis. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photomaniacal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Should linking be illegal? &#124; Dan Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397432</link>
		<dc:creator>Photomaniacal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Should linking be illegal? &#124; Dan Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397432</guid>
		<description>[...] notion set off an eruption from the likes of Jeff Jarvis, Matt Welch and Erick Schonfeld, among others. And they are right to be furious. Not only would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] notion set off an eruption from the likes of Jeff Jarvis, Matt Welch and Erick Schonfeld, among others. And they are right to be furious. Not only would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First, kill the lawyers – before they kill the news - 5WPR</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397365</link>
		<dc:creator>First, kill the lawyers – before they kill the news - 5WPR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397365</guid>
		<description>[...] the frighteningly dangerous thinking of Judge Richard Posner – proposing rewriting copyright law to outlaw linking to and summarizing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the frighteningly dangerous thinking of Judge Richard Posner – proposing rewriting copyright law to outlaw linking to and summarizing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genrewonk &#187; If you thought the last way to save newspapers was stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397331</link>
		<dc:creator>Genrewonk &#187; If you thought the last way to save newspapers was stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397331</guid>
		<description>[...] here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397226</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397226</guid>
		<description>Cute, but dishonest.  In other words, vintage Manitoba.

I&#039;ve nothing against someone trying to profit from their work, whatever its form.  I do point out that customers get a vote too.  If they don&#039;t want to pay what you want, your only option is to refuse to provide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cute, but dishonest.  In other words, vintage Manitoba.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve nothing against someone trying to profit from their work, whatever its form.  I do point out that customers get a vote too.  If they don&#8217;t want to pay what you want, your only option is to refuse to provide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397224</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397224</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; Legal briefs and judge’s opinions are filled with “links” (i.e. citations) to other works. In many cases, those “links” are actually the primary value of the work produced, for pay, by those who write briefs.

That&#039;s not quite right.  Figuring out what links to put where is (some of) the value produced by lawyers.  The folks who are producing comparable works (documents with links to interesting things) are being compensated, so I don&#039;t see what distinction is being made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; Legal briefs and judge’s opinions are filled with “links” (i.e. citations) to other works. In many cases, those “links” are actually the primary value of the work produced, for pay, by those who write briefs.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not quite right.  Figuring out what links to put where is (some of) the value produced by lawyers.  The folks who are producing comparable works (documents with links to interesting things) are being compensated, so I don&#8217;t see what distinction is being made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ¿Tienen los enlaces derechos de autor? &#171; Diario de hoy</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397193</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Tienen los enlaces derechos de autor? &#171; Diario de hoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397193</guid>
		<description>[...] El periodista  Jeff Jarvis considera ésta una idea contraria al progreso del periodismo tal y cómo se desarrolla actualmente la distribución de noticias  en todo el mundo y pone como ejemplo la cobertura que medios tan influyentes como el Guardian o el New York Times han hecho de las protestas políticas en Irán. Enlazando contenidos de otros medios. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] El periodista  Jeff Jarvis considera ésta una idea contraria al progreso del periodismo tal y cómo se desarrolla actualmente la distribución de noticias  en todo el mundo y pone como ejemplo la cobertura que medios tan influyentes como el Guardian o el New York Times han hecho de las protestas políticas en Irán. Enlazando contenidos de otros medios. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First, kill the lawyers &#8211; before they kill the news &#171; BuzzMachine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397181</link>
		<dc:creator>First, kill the lawyers &#8211; before they kill the news &#171; BuzzMachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397181</guid>
		<description>[...] the frighteningly dangerous thinking of Judge Richard Posner &#8211; proposing rewriting copyright law to outlaw linking to and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the frighteningly dangerous thinking of Judge Richard Posner &#8211; proposing rewriting copyright law to outlaw linking to and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge Posner Wants To Outlaw Linking &#124; The Daily Dogcast</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397172</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge Posner Wants To Outlaw Linking &#124; The Daily Dogcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 08:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397172</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8211; I&#8217;d better link to this story (and also here) before a mad judge outlaws [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; I&#8217;d better link to this story (and also here) before a mad judge outlaws [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Manitoba</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/26/posners-dangerous-thinking/#comment-397157</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Manitoba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 19:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=4922#comment-397157</guid>
		<description>&quot;Plagiarism.&quot; Ho ho. Such a quaint old-media concept. Information wants to be free. Adapt or perish, Freeman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Plagiarism.&#8221; Ho ho. Such a quaint old-media concept. Information wants to be free. Adapt or perish, Freeman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

