<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giving up on the news business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: No bailouts for news &#124; Richard Hartley</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-459318</link>
		<dc:creator>No bailouts for news &#124; Richard Hartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-459318</guid>
		<description>[...] intervention at several levels even as they praise market solutions. (In his well-reasoned post on Monday Jeff Jarvis says that the authors &quot;are addressing the business problem of news without [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] intervention at several levels even as they praise market solutions. (In his well-reasoned post on Monday Jeff Jarvis says that the authors &quot;are addressing the business problem of news without [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taking &#8216;Broccoli Journalism&#8217; Hyperlocal &#124; Street Fight</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-452589</link>
		<dc:creator>Taking &#8216;Broccoli Journalism&#8217; Hyperlocal &#124; Street Fight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-452589</guid>
		<description>[...] summed up the Mark Zuckerberg-Facebook biopic The Social Network.  But I wish his jibe about “broccoli journalism” didn’t prove so hardy.Jarvis coined the phrase in 2009 – in an attack on a report calling [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] summed up the Mark Zuckerberg-Facebook biopic The Social Network.  But I wish his jibe about “broccoli journalism” didn’t prove so hardy.Jarvis coined the phrase in 2009 – in an attack on a report calling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No American BBC &#171; BuzzMachine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-418467</link>
		<dc:creator>No American BBC &#171; BuzzMachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-418467</guid>
		<description>[...] Columbia presented its plan to save journalism &#8212; which included government subsidy &#8212; I had this discussion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Columbia presented its plan to save journalism &#8212; which included government subsidy &#8212; I had this discussion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An American BBC? Thanks, But We&#8217;ll Pass &#124; Media and Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-418319</link>
		<dc:creator>An American BBC? Thanks, But We&#8217;ll Pass &#124; Media and Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-418319</guid>
		<description>[...] Columbia presented its plan to save journalism - which included government subsidy - I had this discussion with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Columbia presented its plan to save journalism &#8211; which included government subsidy &#8211; I had this discussion with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t reward broccoli journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-410289</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t reward broccoli journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-410289</guid>
		<description>[...] people don&#8217;t want to pay for our work, the government should” is defeatism, nothing else. As Jeff Jarvis snidely remarks: “This is the ultimate in broccoli journalism: You are not only forced to read what journalists [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] people don&#8217;t want to pay for our work, the government should” is defeatism, nothing else. As Jeff Jarvis snidely remarks: “This is the ultimate in broccoli journalism: You are not only forced to read what journalists [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The future of news is entrepreneurial &#171; BuzzMachine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403945</link>
		<dc:creator>The future of news is entrepreneurial &#171; BuzzMachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403945</guid>
		<description>[...] business prospects for news and resorts to what I believe are desperate measures &#8211; namely: the public option for news. The Washington Post has run two op-eds lately endorsing tax-supported journalism (pardon me for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] business prospects for news and resorts to what I believe are desperate measures &#8211; namely: the public option for news. The Washington Post has run two op-eds lately endorsing tax-supported journalism (pardon me for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine Cullen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403851</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine Cullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403851</guid>
		<description>I find this a disturbing consideration and something that has been tried before, in totalitarian regimes, including Germany, where as a commentator above has noted, the same &quot;model&quot; has been forwarded. Clearly here in the U.S. the problem is an unsustainable business model that allowed the content of news articles to be published online for free, which clearly cut into their news and delivery sales since people could now read the same articles for free online. As well, advertisers, not being sure of the readership or locale of the online readers, are far less likely to advertise in online editions of news, thereby cutting the only two sources of revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this a disturbing consideration and something that has been tried before, in totalitarian regimes, including Germany, where as a commentator above has noted, the same &#8220;model&#8221; has been forwarded. Clearly here in the U.S. the problem is an unsustainable business model that allowed the content of news articles to be published online for free, which clearly cut into their news and delivery sales since people could now read the same articles for free online. As well, advertisers, not being sure of the readership or locale of the online readers, are far less likely to advertise in online editions of news, thereby cutting the only two sources of revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Report aus den USA: "The Reconstruction of American Journalism" - Initiative Büro für investigativen Journalismus</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403794</link>
		<dc:creator>Report aus den USA: "The Reconstruction of American Journalism" - Initiative Büro für investigativen Journalismus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403794</guid>
		<description>[...] Und eine kritische Stimme von Journalismus-Professor Jeff Jarvis: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Und eine kritische Stimme von Journalismus-Professor Jeff Jarvis: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commentary on Downie and Schudson&#8217;s &#8220;The Reconstruction of American Journalism&#8221; &#171; Pursuing the Complete Community Connection</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403524</link>
		<dc:creator>Commentary on Downie and Schudson&#8217;s &#8220;The Reconstruction of American Journalism&#8221; &#171; Pursuing the Complete Community Connection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403524</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis said Downie and Schudson reached faulty conclusions by starting with a mistaken &#8221;dire assumption that journalism is dying with newspapers.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis said Downie and Schudson reached faulty conclusions by starting with a mistaken &#8221;dire assumption that journalism is dying with newspapers.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wyman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403484</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Wyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403484</guid>
		<description>Yahoo seems to have decided that competing with the existing news publishers is probably going to be more productive than trying to help them... 
See: http://www.andrewgolis.com/blog/?p=3314

bob wyman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo seems to have decided that competing with the existing news publishers is probably going to be more productive than trying to help them&#8230;<br />
See: <a href="http://www.andrewgolis.com/blog/?p=3314" rel="nofollow">http://www.andrewgolis.com/blog/?p=3314</a></p>
<p>bob wyman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BMoreKarl</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403444</link>
		<dc:creator>BMoreKarl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403444</guid>
		<description>Anybody see a troubling trend in this administration - the Executive Branch in particular seems to be flirting with the idea of defining who is and who isn&#039;t covered by the First Amendment protection of the free press.

With the whole War on Fox News - i find it disturbing that first the FTC and now Administration officials are saying who is and who isn&#039;t the press.

Definition is a form of regulation. You have no say in the Matter. I can say Fox News is not what they say they are, but you, Mr. Obama-Flunky can not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody see a troubling trend in this administration &#8211; the Executive Branch in particular seems to be flirting with the idea of defining who is and who isn&#8217;t covered by the First Amendment protection of the free press.</p>
<p>With the whole War on Fox News &#8211; i find it disturbing that first the FTC and now Administration officials are saying who is and who isn&#8217;t the press.</p>
<p>Definition is a form of regulation. You have no say in the Matter. I can say Fox News is not what they say they are, but you, Mr. Obama-Flunky can not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photomaniacal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No bailouts for news &#124; Dan Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403420</link>
		<dc:creator>Photomaniacal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No bailouts for news &#124; Dan Gillmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403420</guid>
		<description>[...] intervention at several levels even as they praise market solutions. (In his well-reasoned post on Monday Jeff Jarvis says that the authors &#8220;are addressing the business problem of news [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] intervention at several levels even as they praise market solutions. (In his well-reasoned post on Monday Jeff Jarvis says that the authors &#8220;are addressing the business problem of news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Public Option and American Journalism &#171; rasmuskleisnielsen.net</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403419</link>
		<dc:creator>The Public Option and American Journalism &#171; rasmuskleisnielsen.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403419</guid>
		<description>[...] the New York Times&#8217; David Carr&#8217;s mind &#8220;reel&#8221; in his coverage of the report, Jeff Jarvis calls the idea &#8220;desperate&#8221; on BuzzMachine, and Michelle McLellan, writing in the Knight Digital Media Center newsletter, finds [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the New York Times&#8217; David Carr&#8217;s mind &#8220;reel&#8221; in his coverage of the report, Jeff Jarvis calls the idea &#8220;desperate&#8221; on BuzzMachine, and Michelle McLellan, writing in the Knight Digital Media Center newsletter, finds [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptiousNut</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403399</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptiousNut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403399</guid>
		<description>Jeff

With respect, you might want to research the history of government and education.  Doing so you&#039;d see that the singular goal of US *public* education was to tranquilize the masses, i.e. suppress far more than just the first Amendment.

THE book is online, and free:

http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/underground/toc1.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff</p>
<p>With respect, you might want to research the history of government and education.  Doing so you&#8217;d see that the singular goal of US *public* education was to tranquilize the masses, i.e. suppress far more than just the first Amendment.</p>
<p>THE book is online, and free:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/underground/toc1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/underground/toc1.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptiousNut</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403397</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptiousNut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403397</guid>
		<description>Ah......they already do.

They are subsidizing the hell out of the pagan earth worship creed: windmills, overpriced hybrid cars, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230;&#8230;they already do.</p>
<p>They are subsidizing the hell out of the pagan earth worship creed: windmills, overpriced hybrid cars, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Higgitt</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403395</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Higgitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403395</guid>
		<description>A really interesting piece, Jeff, and incredibly useful. We have a situation here in the UK where our newspapers are in various states of managed decline, with a management that seems determined to squeeze what is left for every penny of profit, regardless of whether they tank those papers or not.

To my mind, the essence of the issue is that there is still a readership out there, but that many of our commercial organisations no longer find it profitable to deliver news. As a consequence, I believe they have abdicated their responsibilities to their readership and no longer deserve to be saved.

News consumers are no longer loyal to titles, certainly not in the way they once were. This is bad news for news organisations, but it provides a chink of light for reporters, those that are brave enough to begin producing their own news output and smart enough to find routes to market. As such, I&#039;m thinking that what we need is support for journalism business colleges, providing reporting standards, commercial expertise and new media research and development facilities, rather than state aid.

I&#039;ve written about it here: http://waleshome.org/2009/10/paper-nightmares/

It&#039;s started a bit of a debate in Wales. However, we&#039;re still quite some way behind the work that&#039;s gone on in the US (regardless of whether you agree with individual findings or not), even though our problems sound the same. I&#039;d like to keep in touch on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A really interesting piece, Jeff, and incredibly useful. We have a situation here in the UK where our newspapers are in various states of managed decline, with a management that seems determined to squeeze what is left for every penny of profit, regardless of whether they tank those papers or not.</p>
<p>To my mind, the essence of the issue is that there is still a readership out there, but that many of our commercial organisations no longer find it profitable to deliver news. As a consequence, I believe they have abdicated their responsibilities to their readership and no longer deserve to be saved.</p>
<p>News consumers are no longer loyal to titles, certainly not in the way they once were. This is bad news for news organisations, but it provides a chink of light for reporters, those that are brave enough to begin producing their own news output and smart enough to find routes to market. As such, I&#8217;m thinking that what we need is support for journalism business colleges, providing reporting standards, commercial expertise and new media research and development facilities, rather than state aid.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written about it here: <a href="http://waleshome.org/2009/10/paper-nightmares/" rel="nofollow">http://waleshome.org/2009/10/paper-nightmares/</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s started a bit of a debate in Wales. However, we&#8217;re still quite some way behind the work that&#8217;s gone on in the US (regardless of whether you agree with individual findings or not), even though our problems sound the same. I&#8217;d like to keep in touch on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cm</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403392</link>
		<dc:creator>cm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403392</guid>
		<description>So what?

Perhaps real journalism has been eroding for the last while to the extent that nobody really cares and it really doesn&#039;t add value to society. If not perhaps journalism should go the same way as other once-useful occupations like farriers, lamp-lighters and bustle-makers.

News is now in the business of competing for eyeballs and attention. As a consumer I can read/watc/listen to the news or I can read a novel, watch Oprah/sitcom or listen to music radio. As a media exec (eg TV) I can run sitcoms or news, quality is determined by which provides the best revenue stream, not by fact.

So-called journalism has been changed by this, serving up sound-bite sized alarmism. The days of critical investigative journalism are gone. It is really just infotainment.

Perhaps many journalists think they are serving society by bringing news and commentary which informs people. Perhaps they are providing this, but that does not mean people are really taking that onboard.  Public opinion is swayed far more by what Oprah says, or what Arnie or Dan Browne say in some eco-thriller than any fact-based journalism..

I&#039;m not for a minute suggesting that old-time journalism really has no value to me. Unfortunately there is less and less value to most people and I am probably part of a dying breed of people who care more about truth than perception. Unfortunately journalism seems to be reinventing itself to be more and more trendy to keep market appeal. In doing so journalism loses its core value to people like me and is 
cutting its own throat.

I don&#039;t think it is easy to ask people to make painful changes.  I&#039;m sure that to ask many committed journalists to give up their passions for truth etc and become media whores for better business is like asking a concert pianist to change to rap becuase it sells more records (or T shirts).

I&#039;m not a journalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what?</p>
<p>Perhaps real journalism has been eroding for the last while to the extent that nobody really cares and it really doesn&#8217;t add value to society. If not perhaps journalism should go the same way as other once-useful occupations like farriers, lamp-lighters and bustle-makers.</p>
<p>News is now in the business of competing for eyeballs and attention. As a consumer I can read/watc/listen to the news or I can read a novel, watch Oprah/sitcom or listen to music radio. As a media exec (eg TV) I can run sitcoms or news, quality is determined by which provides the best revenue stream, not by fact.</p>
<p>So-called journalism has been changed by this, serving up sound-bite sized alarmism. The days of critical investigative journalism are gone. It is really just infotainment.</p>
<p>Perhaps many journalists think they are serving society by bringing news and commentary which informs people. Perhaps they are providing this, but that does not mean people are really taking that onboard.  Public opinion is swayed far more by what Oprah says, or what Arnie or Dan Browne say in some eco-thriller than any fact-based journalism..</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not for a minute suggesting that old-time journalism really has no value to me. Unfortunately there is less and less value to most people and I am probably part of a dying breed of people who care more about truth than perception. Unfortunately journalism seems to be reinventing itself to be more and more trendy to keep market appeal. In doing so journalism loses its core value to people like me and is<br />
cutting its own throat.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it is easy to ask people to make painful changes.  I&#8217;m sure that to ask many committed journalists to give up their passions for truth etc and become media whores for better business is like asking a concert pianist to change to rap becuase it sells more records (or T shirts).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a journalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danielsaltman &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Naples caught red handed engaging in scams</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403386</link>
		<dc:creator>danielsaltman &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Naples caught red handed engaging in scams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403386</guid>
		<description>[...] Giving up on the &lt;b&gt;news&lt;/b&gt; business &#171; BuzzMachine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Giving up on the &lt;b&gt;news&lt;/b&gt; business &laquo; BuzzMachine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We420.com &#8212; Blog &#8212; Naples Fl. busted engaging in a mortgage fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403385</link>
		<dc:creator>We420.com &#8212; Blog &#8212; Naples Fl. busted engaging in a mortgage fraud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403385</guid>
		<description>[...] Giving up on the &lt;b&gt;news&lt;/b&gt; business &#171; BuzzMachine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Giving up on the &lt;b&gt;news&lt;/b&gt; business &laquo; BuzzMachine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are there any home owners are being scammed via chinese drywall &#124; dansaltman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403376</link>
		<dc:creator>Are there any home owners are being scammed via chinese drywall &#124; dansaltman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403376</guid>
		<description>[...] Giving up on the &lt;b&gt;news&lt;/b&gt; business &#171; BuzzMachine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Giving up on the &lt;b&gt;news&lt;/b&gt; business &laquo; BuzzMachine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tex Lovera</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403375</link>
		<dc:creator>Tex Lovera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403375</guid>
		<description>What bullshit.

Let&#039;s see, what do we have going on these days:

Tea Partys all over the country with a true grass-roots participation by people formerly disconnected from the political process.

More debate with MORE VOICES than we&#039;ve ever had on major issues:  the economy, the war, health care, global warming, you name it.

All while the newsPAPERS go down the toilet.

Tell me again why they need to be saved?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What bullshit.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see, what do we have going on these days:</p>
<p>Tea Partys all over the country with a true grass-roots participation by people formerly disconnected from the political process.</p>
<p>More debate with MORE VOICES than we&#8217;ve ever had on major issues:  the economy, the war, health care, global warming, you name it.</p>
<p>All while the newsPAPERS go down the toilet.</p>
<p>Tell me again why they need to be saved?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-10-20 &#124; Innovation in College Media</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403374</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-10-20 &#124; Innovation in College Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403374</guid>
		<description>[...] Giving up on the news business BuzzMachine &quot;Just because newspapers put themselves at risk, it does not follow that journalism is at risk. Newspapers no longer own journalism.&quot; I would argue they never owned journalism to begin with. Jeff Jarvis rants. (tags: Media&amp;Journalism journalism jeffjarvis ReconstructionofAmericanJournalism) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Giving up on the news business BuzzMachine &quot;Just because newspapers put themselves at risk, it does not follow that journalism is at risk. Newspapers no longer own journalism.&quot; I would argue they never owned journalism to begin with. Jeff Jarvis rants. (tags: Media&amp;Journalism journalism jeffjarvis ReconstructionofAmericanJournalism) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jornalismo subsidiado? Soluções para uma crise declarada &#187; Ensino de Jornalismo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403365</link>
		<dc:creator>Jornalismo subsidiado? Soluções para uma crise declarada &#187; Ensino de Jornalismo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403365</guid>
		<description>[...] De fato, mal o relatório tornou-se público, David Carr, William Carleton, Dan Gillmor e Jeff Jarvis, criticaram as posições [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] De fato, mal o relatório tornou-se público, David Carr, William Carleton, Dan Gillmor e Jeff Jarvis, criticaram as posições [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JORNALICES &#124; Pedro Jerónimo com coisas (multi)media</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403356</link>
		<dc:creator>JORNALICES &#124; Pedro Jerónimo com coisas (multi)media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403356</guid>
		<description>[...] risco. Vale a pena ler a resposta do acutilante Jeff Jarvis a alguns “profetas da desgraça”, que apontam para o fim do jornalismo. Especialmente para [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] risco. Vale a pena ler a resposta do acutilante Jeff Jarvis a alguns “profetas da desgraça”, que apontam para o fim do jornalismo. Especialmente para [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andee Sellman, One Sherpa</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/#comment-403352</link>
		<dc:creator>Andee Sellman, One Sherpa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5418#comment-403352</guid>
		<description>True journalism will never die. Controlled middlemen posing as journalists and acting on the orders of editors may find themselves surplus to requirements as readers are able to get to the heart of matters more quickly through social media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True journalism will never die. Controlled middlemen posing as journalists and acting on the orders of editors may find themselves surplus to requirements as readers are able to get to the heart of matters more quickly through social media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

