<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Editor as star</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:29:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Udo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-404148</link>
		<dc:creator>Udo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-404148</guid>
		<description>BILD is not a newspaper. It&#039;s a tabloid. It claims to be opinionated, but in reality it&#039;s just a remotely news-like service for stupid people. &quot;BILD&quot; means &quot;image&quot;, and that&#039;s what it is. There are lots of colorful images, and what little text exists in between is utterly moronic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BILD is not a newspaper. It&#8217;s a tabloid. It claims to be opinionated, but in reality it&#8217;s just a remotely news-like service for stupid people. &#8220;BILD&#8221; means &#8220;image&#8221;, and that&#8217;s what it is. There are lots of colorful images, and what little text exists in between is utterly moronic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Themenblog &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Das Netz ist nicht schuld an deiner Einsamkeit</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-404116</link>
		<dc:creator>Themenblog &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Das Netz ist nicht schuld an deiner Einsamkeit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-404116</guid>
		<description>[...] Studien-Ergebnisse führt Pew Internet hier aus.   Social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Studien-Ergebnisse führt Pew Internet hier aus.   Social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torsten</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403909</link>
		<dc:creator>Torsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403909</guid>
		<description>from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild 

&quot;......Criticism

It is argued Bild&#039;s thirst for sensationalism results in the terrorizing of prominent people (such as TV presenter Charlotte Roche) and stories are frequently based on the most dubious evidence. The journalistic standards of Bild, or the lack thereof, are the subject to frequent criticism by German intellectuals and media observers.

    * BILDblog ([1]), a German weblog that when founded was dedicated solely to documenting errors and fabrications in Bild articles, is among Germany&#039;s most popular blogs. In 2005, BILDblog received the Grimme Online Award for its work. Since 2009 BILDblog also reports on errors and fabrications in other newspapers from Germany and elsewhere.

    * Heinrich Böll&#039;s 1974 novel The Lost Honor of Katharina Blum, and the 1975 movie based on it, used a fictional stand-in for Bild to make a point about its allegedly unethical journalistic practices. Böll&#039;s public words on the Bild&#039;s coverage of the Baader-Meinhof Gang activities in the early 1970s were: [what Bild does] isn’t cryptofascist anymore, not fascistoid, but naked fascism, agitation, lies and dirt.

    * In 1977 investigative journalist Günther Wallraff worked for four months as an editor for the Bild newspaper in Hanover, giving himself the alias of &quot;Hans Esser&quot;. In his books Der Aufmacher (Lead Story) and Zeugen der Anklage (Witnesses for the Prosecution) he portrays his experiences on the editorial staff of the paper and the journalism which he encountered there. The staff commonly displayed contempt for humanity, a lack of respect for the privacy of ordinary people and widespread conduct of unethical research and editing techniques.

    * In 2004 Bild was publicly reprimanded 12 times by the Deutscher Presserat (German Press Council). This amounts for a third of the reprimands this self-regulation council of the German press declared that year.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from Wikipedia: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild</a> </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;&#8230;Criticism</p>
<p>It is argued Bild&#8217;s thirst for sensationalism results in the terrorizing of prominent people (such as TV presenter Charlotte Roche) and stories are frequently based on the most dubious evidence. The journalistic standards of Bild, or the lack thereof, are the subject to frequent criticism by German intellectuals and media observers.</p>
<p>    * BILDblog ([1]), a German weblog that when founded was dedicated solely to documenting errors and fabrications in Bild articles, is among Germany&#8217;s most popular blogs. In 2005, BILDblog received the Grimme Online Award for its work. Since 2009 BILDblog also reports on errors and fabrications in other newspapers from Germany and elsewhere.</p>
<p>    * Heinrich Böll&#8217;s 1974 novel The Lost Honor of Katharina Blum, and the 1975 movie based on it, used a fictional stand-in for Bild to make a point about its allegedly unethical journalistic practices. Böll&#8217;s public words on the Bild&#8217;s coverage of the Baader-Meinhof Gang activities in the early 1970s were: [what Bild does] isn’t cryptofascist anymore, not fascistoid, but naked fascism, agitation, lies and dirt.</p>
<p>    * In 1977 investigative journalist Günther Wallraff worked for four months as an editor for the Bild newspaper in Hanover, giving himself the alias of &#8220;Hans Esser&#8221;. In his books Der Aufmacher (Lead Story) and Zeugen der Anklage (Witnesses for the Prosecution) he portrays his experiences on the editorial staff of the paper and the journalism which he encountered there. The staff commonly displayed contempt for humanity, a lack of respect for the privacy of ordinary people and widespread conduct of unethical research and editing techniques.</p>
<p>    * In 2004 Bild was publicly reprimanded 12 times by the Deutscher Presserat (German Press Council). This amounts for a third of the reprimands this self-regulation council of the German press declared that year.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403896</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403896</guid>
		<description>Nazi flying sausages? I&#039;d pay to see that ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nazi flying sausages? I&#8217;d pay to see that &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miT</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403895</link>
		<dc:creator>miT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403895</guid>
		<description>Jeff i always thought ure a very intelligent person, so please get some more informations about the Bild. Its so ridicilous that u give the newspaper/theirEditorInChief a platform on ur blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff i always thought ure a very intelligent person, so please get some more informations about the Bild. Its so ridicilous that u give the newspaper/theirEditorInChief a platform on ur blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403872</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403872</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;Journalist want as many people as possible listen to them. If the reach of an old economy top print brand is lousy in the web, why a top journalist should write for them?

This might be an odd personal quirk, but I like to - and need to! - get paid decently. Old media brands tend to pay very well. New media organizations usually pay really badly. It&#039;s very difficult to make money on a blog without giving speeches or consulting - which creates the kind of conflicts of interest that serious journalists need to avoid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;Journalist want as many people as possible listen to them. If the reach of an old economy top print brand is lousy in the web, why a top journalist should write for them?</p>
<p>This might be an odd personal quirk, but I like to &#8211; and need to! &#8211; get paid decently. Old media brands tend to pay very well. New media organizations usually pay really badly. It&#8217;s very difficult to make money on a blog without giving speeches or consulting &#8211; which creates the kind of conflicts of interest that serious journalists need to avoid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregor Heinzelmann</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403869</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregor Heinzelmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403869</guid>
		<description>(he never answers comments)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(he never answers comments)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregor Heinzelmann</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403868</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregor Heinzelmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403868</guid>
		<description>Oh yes he should. Everybody thinks that. I think it will cost him a lot of interesting readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes he should. Everybody thinks that. I think it will cost him a lot of interesting readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Wurst</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403863</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Wurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403863</guid>
		<description>Lucky you, America ....

&quot;Kai Diekmann (...) is a journalistic celebrity of a sort we don’t have here:&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucky you, America &#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Kai Diekmann (&#8230;) is a journalistic celebrity of a sort we don’t have here:&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beim Barte des Propheten &#171; KAI DIEKMANNS BLOG</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403858</link>
		<dc:creator>Beim Barte des Propheten &#171; KAI DIEKMANNS BLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403858</guid>
		<description>[...] Ich halte Jeff für einen der besten Experten zum Thema Zukunft der Medien, die es auf der Welt gibt. Und er schreibt nicht nur tolle Bücher, sondern auch tolle Kommentare auf seinem Blog buzzmachine.com (mein Lieblingsblog, ganz nebenbei). So wie diesen Beitrag hier. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ich halte Jeff für einen der besten Experten zum Thema Zukunft der Medien, die es auf der Welt gibt. Und er schreibt nicht nur tolle Bücher, sondern auch tolle Kommentare auf seinem Blog buzzmachine.com (mein Lieblingsblog, ganz nebenbei). So wie diesen Beitrag hier. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H3</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403849</link>
		<dc:creator>H3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403849</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff,
I listined today to your inspiring keynote at Munich Medientage.

It&#039;s so sad you were not attending the following discussion.
Nobody of the panelist understood that the brands of the publishing companies (or they don&#039;t dare to say so) are just nothing with those key journalists, like Kai for bild and bild.de.
If those guys (and I guess Kai got the point) discover their value in terms of direct profits by publishing on their own brand and further realizing how to get the bugs directly (more or less easily, if you know how to handle Google ;-)), they will fade away instantly and the users as well.

That&#039;s the main task for publisher! How to be attractive to top journalists (= top ego) and that those guys will stick to the publisher brands.
Beside the monetary aspect, there is one solution: Unique users!
Journalist want as many people as possible listen to them. If the reach of an old economy top print brand is lousy in the web, why a top journalist should write for them? Reach-investments in terms of unique users should be the prior strategy for publishers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff,<br />
I listined today to your inspiring keynote at Munich Medientage.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s so sad you were not attending the following discussion.<br />
Nobody of the panelist understood that the brands of the publishing companies (or they don&#8217;t dare to say so) are just nothing with those key journalists, like Kai for bild and bild.de.<br />
If those guys (and I guess Kai got the point) discover their value in terms of direct profits by publishing on their own brand and further realizing how to get the bugs directly (more or less easily, if you know how to handle Google <img src='http://www.buzzmachine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ), they will fade away instantly and the users as well.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the main task for publisher! How to be attractive to top journalists (= top ego) and that those guys will stick to the publisher brands.<br />
Beside the monetary aspect, there is one solution: Unique users!<br />
Journalist want as many people as possible listen to them. If the reach of an old economy top print brand is lousy in the web, why a top journalist should write for them? Reach-investments in terms of unique users should be the prior strategy for publishers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gauvin</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403834</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gauvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403834</guid>
		<description>Jeff&#039;s just taking the jiffy pop balloon for a spin, as usual...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff&#8217;s just taking the jiffy pop balloon for a spin, as usual&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RunBay</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403832</link>
		<dc:creator>RunBay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403832</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t get the point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t get the point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403824</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403824</guid>
		<description>Jeff, you might also note that Springer supports a proposal in Germany to protect the value of news online. (Details: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/business/global/29copy.html?ref=business) This seems like a much better plan than promoting a cult of personality around an editor with an attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, you might also note that Springer supports a proposal in Germany to protect the value of news online. (Details: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/business/global/29copy.html?ref=business)" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/business/global/29copy.html?ref=business)</a> This seems like a much better plan than promoting a cult of personality around an editor with an attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403802</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403802</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m more interested in Die Bild&#039;s fantastic coverage of Knut the cue polar bear - they really owned that story. Not many others, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m more interested in Die Bild&#8217;s fantastic coverage of Knut the cue polar bear &#8211; they really owned that story. Not many others, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403788</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403788</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t say it was transparency. I said it was brand. Different discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t say it was transparency. I said it was brand. Different discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dailycatessen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403786</link>
		<dc:creator>Dailycatessen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403786</guid>
		<description>hi Jeff

As of today the french government is giving away 200 000 free newspaper subscriptions to youths aged 18 to 24 in an attempt to save the print press...
read a summary here 

http://www.dailycatessen.com/2009/10/free-annual-press-suscription-way_28.html

would be glad to have your thoughts on this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Jeff</p>
<p>As of today the french government is giving away 200 000 free newspaper subscriptions to youths aged 18 to 24 in an attempt to save the print press&#8230;<br />
read a summary here </p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailycatessen.com/2009/10/free-annual-press-suscription-way_28.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailycatessen.com/2009/10/free-annual-press-suscription-way_28.html</a></p>
<p>would be glad to have your thoughts on this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403782</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403782</guid>
		<description>I think he should be do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he should be do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-10-28 &#8211; synapsenschnappsen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403781</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-10-28 &#8211; synapsenschnappsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403781</guid>
		<description>[...] Editor as star « BuzzMachine Sogar Jeff Jarvis schreibt &#252;ber Diekmanns Blog (tags: Jarvis_Jeff Blogger Journalismus) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Editor as star « BuzzMachine Sogar Jeff Jarvis schreibt &#252;ber Diekmanns Blog (tags: Jarvis_Jeff Blogger Journalismus) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joha</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403780</link>
		<dc:creator>Joha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403780</guid>
		<description>Jeff -
I am sorry to say this, but your approach is rather naive. This has nothing to do with transparency, but is all about PR and ego boost. A journalist using a new tool is not a good thing per se, this use has to add value. This is l&#039;art pour l&#039;lart by a the chief editor whose company does not do much to bring the industry forward, but often harms its reputation by intruding into other people&#039;s private sphere.

I will give Mr. Diekmann credit if he really manages to get involved into a dialogue and uses his blog to respond to criticism other sites like bildblog.de articulate every day. Until he does so, this is nothing but another channel for his PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff -<br />
I am sorry to say this, but your approach is rather naive. This has nothing to do with transparency, but is all about PR and ego boost. A journalist using a new tool is not a good thing per se, this use has to add value. This is l&#8217;art pour l&#8217;lart by a the chief editor whose company does not do much to bring the industry forward, but often harms its reputation by intruding into other people&#8217;s private sphere.</p>
<p>I will give Mr. Diekmann credit if he really manages to get involved into a dialogue and uses his blog to respond to criticism other sites like bildblog.de articulate every day. Until he does so, this is nothing but another channel for his PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403768</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403768</guid>
		<description>As far as I know, Diekman doesn&#039;t plan to write &#039;his&#039; blog-articles himself, but lets some BILD-editors write them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, Diekman doesn&#8217;t plan to write &#8216;his&#8217; blog-articles himself, but lets some BILD-editors write them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403756</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403756</guid>
		<description>Andy, appreciate the compliment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, appreciate the compliment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebs</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403755</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403755</guid>
		<description>Diekman and Bild are the wors Germany has to offer. He and his paper is continuing a german path that we aleady walked: Rise sensiments on marginal groups, reporting on content that simply is wrong (nazi flying sausages appear again and again), works towards a more cassism based looks o the society by reporting on theft of social help by those who have nothing, reports biased to big comapnies etc. etc. 
Diekmann is simply covering the fact that in newspaper and offline, both, he has not the relevance he would like to be and tries to ephasize the fact by behaving like the worst of the worst of our society. 
If it comes to the methods of bild product they are pulling off the whole set of tools we do not want to see in journalism 

1. They &quot;fix&quot; their numbers offline and online 
2. The so called &quot;Volksprodukte&quot; besides the WWII soundish name are clearly a breach of the indipendence of journalism (compare the list of best tested notebooks of computerbild and contendor chip.de .... computerbild seems to be biased towards medion, which is the manufacturer of the &quot;Volks-PC&quot;). 
3. The main theme seems to be bashing the poor and FUD in the Bildzeitung
4. It&#039;s NOT quality journalism, any studen of a journalism school here in germany can tell you that
5. They are requarly violating the rules of humanity by for example showing faces of people accused of criminal acts (which they are not allowed by journalism regulations) 

Yeah, he is a attentionwhore. We give him what he wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diekman and Bild are the wors Germany has to offer. He and his paper is continuing a german path that we aleady walked: Rise sensiments on marginal groups, reporting on content that simply is wrong (nazi flying sausages appear again and again), works towards a more cassism based looks o the society by reporting on theft of social help by those who have nothing, reports biased to big comapnies etc. etc.<br />
Diekmann is simply covering the fact that in newspaper and offline, both, he has not the relevance he would like to be and tries to ephasize the fact by behaving like the worst of the worst of our society.<br />
If it comes to the methods of bild product they are pulling off the whole set of tools we do not want to see in journalism </p>
<p>1. They &#8220;fix&#8221; their numbers offline and online<br />
2. The so called &#8220;Volksprodukte&#8221; besides the WWII soundish name are clearly a breach of the indipendence of journalism (compare the list of best tested notebooks of computerbild and contendor chip.de &#8230;. computerbild seems to be biased towards medion, which is the manufacturer of the &#8220;Volks-PC&#8221;).<br />
3. The main theme seems to be bashing the poor and FUD in the Bildzeitung<br />
4. It&#8217;s NOT quality journalism, any studen of a journalism school here in germany can tell you that<br />
5. They are requarly violating the rules of humanity by for example showing faces of people accused of criminal acts (which they are not allowed by journalism regulations) </p>
<p>Yeah, he is a attentionwhore. We give him what he wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403754</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403754</guid>
		<description>Ah yes.  It&#039;s good for the &quot;legit&quot; press to pick up stories from the DNC and various party organizations, but wrong to cover a story broken by Fox.

I&#039;m beginning to think that excess alcohol consumption made the golden age of journalism possible.  When you folk stay sober and talk in public, you&#039;re pretty much a disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes.  It&#8217;s good for the &#8220;legit&#8221; press to pick up stories from the DNC and various party organizations, but wrong to cover a story broken by Fox.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to think that excess alcohol consumption made the golden age of journalism possible.  When you folk stay sober and talk in public, you&#8217;re pretty much a disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boah, ist der Diekmann! &#124; soziolot</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/26/editor-as-star/#comment-403753</link>
		<dc:creator>Boah, ist der Diekmann! &#124; soziolot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=5446#comment-403753</guid>
		<description>[...] gelesen werden und null Resonanz erzielen. Jeff Jarvis bringt es auf den Punkt, wenn er schreibt: &#8220;And he’s getting attention, which surely is the goal.&#8221; Anscheinend kommen aber einige nicht damit klar, dass [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gelesen werden und null Resonanz erzielen. Jeff Jarvis bringt es auf den Punkt, wenn er schreibt: &#8220;And he’s getting attention, which surely is the goal.&#8221; Anscheinend kommen aber einige nicht damit klar, dass [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
