BuzzMachine
by Jeff Jarvis

April 29, 2004

Koppel, the sequel
: Below, I came out of an internal debate deciding I didn't like Ted Koppel turning the names and images of U.S. soldiers in Iraq into a gimmick. Sinclair TV agrees; they're preempting the show.

``Despite the denials by a spokeswoman for the show, the action appears to be motivated by a political agenda designed to undermine the efforts of the United States in Iraq,'' the company said in a faxed statement. Sinclair, which owns 62 U.S. television stations, said ABC is disguising political statements as news content.
Though I agree with Sinclair's view of the stunt, I don't agree with Sinclair's action. Better to let Koppel do what he wants to do but also to insert the company's statement before and after the show -- and let the audience decide.

Decentralize
: Google is getting flack, and well it should, for killing ads from a T-shirt company that actually tries to say something on its shirts. Its policy forbids "advertisements for language and site content that advocates against an individual, group, or organization." In short: Saying something.
How much better it would be if Google would allow any ad but allow any site to refuse any ad. Put the power in the hands of the players and stand back. Decentralize. That's the moral of the age. Decentralize.

Blog event
: If you're around New York on Monday, make sure you come to the oh-so-hip Apple store for an entertainment event. I'll be playing referee between Denton and Calacanis. That's just one of the three rings in this circus. Details here.

American Idolette
: Wonkette, Ana Marie Cox, is on TV... sort of. She's interviewed for a Washington Post online video thing. Imagine what some production value would bring. She'll be rich and able to provide a decent home for her dog.

Whereabouts
: I'm back home. Was on vacation in Williamsburg all week. Blogging soon enough.

Daily Stern update from the road: A caller said he got a letter from the FCC saying they will not fine Oprah for doing just what Stern did to get fined. Smoking gun of the hypocritical vendetta against him.

: UPDATE: A commenter (rudely) points out that this came from a wack-packer. I had just tuned in and didn't know who it came from.
: UPDATE II: I was going to call the FCC to check on this when I got home. Ernie Miller beat me to it. He says the FCC does not know of such a letter. Howard, it appears, gets a phony phone call from his own phony phone caller.
And I was taken in, too.

On the road again
: Out and about today. Posting resumes later.

About About
: Peter Caputa has some interesting ideas for About.com, suggesting that it become a repository of syndicated blog content, sending revenue to bloggers in return.
I do think there is room -- and a need -- for such a service but I doubt that About.com is the service to do it.
A few months ago, I had lunch with Tom Rogers, the former head of Primedia who bought About.com, and said in the middle of my usual blog evangelism that if About.com started today, it would be decentralized, not centralized. He agreed. Rogers understood the power of niche content and targeting online. When Scott Kurnit started About and Rogers bought it, the decentralized blog world had not yet exploded. But now it has. Yet About remains a centralized content service, not even a portal to decentralized content.
Do we need such a portal to decentralized blog content? That depends on whether you think people will ever specifically wonder what "blogs" have verus what online "content" has. I don't think blogs should segregate themselves from the rest of the content world.
But I do think there is opportunity for sophisticated and decentralized ad and content networks and Caputa's thoughts about grafting such opportunities onto About is an interesting way to frame the discussion. [via PaidContent]

The DaIly Stern

: NEXT, CHICKEN BREASTS WILL BE BANNED: The entertainment reaction to the FCC's new puritanism just keeps getting more absurd. The Wall St. Journal on Fear Factor:

Now producers are on a much shorter leash. Heightened sensitivity to the decency debate means contestants won't be asked to eat the private parts of water buffalo, as in season three. While not banned outright by the network, that sort of thing isn't encouraged, Mr. Kunitz says. Nixed altogether: anything involving animal blood (in one early episode contestants had to bob for rings in a 50-gallon vat of it) and stunts performed in the nude.

Archives:
06/05 ... 05/05 ... 04/05 ... 03/05 ... 02/05 ... 01/05 ... 12/04 ... 11/04 ... 10/04 ... 09/04 ... 08/04 ... 07/04 ... 06/04 ... 05/04 ... 04/04 ... 03/04 ... 02/04 ... 01/04 ... 12/03 ... 11/03 ... 10/03 ... 09/03 ... 08/03 ... 07/03 ... 06/03 ... 05/03 ... 04/03 ... 03/03 ... 02/03 ... 01/03 ... 12/02 ... 11/02 ... 10/02 ... 09/02 ... 08/02 ... 07/02 ... 06/02 ... 05/02 ... 04/02 ... 03/02/a ... 03/02/b ... 02/02 ... 01/02 ... 12/01 ... 11/01 ... 10/01 ... 09/01 ... Current Home



. . .