BuzzMachine
by Jeff Jarvis

December 12, 2004

An American soldier

: Just got email from a miliblogger asking for a link. Most times, like most bloggers, I pass on that; the links come in the course of conversation. But I looked at this one and I was amazed again at the phenomenon of soldiers sharing their thoughts and feelings -- when did that happen before? -- and at the fact that the Pentagon is wise enough to let them. This soldier is about to head out to Iraq. He writes:

Getting ready for this deployment has made my mind think. These are things that I have stored away for some time now. I have always been the type to just perform a mission and drive on while in Army mode or Civilian mode. As a Sniper you need to have that mentality all the time. That same mentality has carried over into my civilian attitude on things at times. I notice that it comes out when I get super busy and pressured to get things done. I take one thing at a time, knock it out and boom, move on. I am so methodical sometimes that it kills me whenever retrospect kicks in....

[M]y family does not know the exact job I do in the Army except my wife. They know that I have been through some special schools. They don’t really know that their son, nephew, grandson, etc is a Sniper. My job description is pretty simple. I find targets and kill them or make equipment go boom. I am sure they would be proud of me and would accept me but I keep that particular detail from them for now.

I know this for certain; they don’t appreciate this war. They do support the Soldiers though. This I am very happy about. It feels good to have family support with all of this....

I hope everyone has a wonderful Holiday Season. Enjoy it like it was you last. Take the moment to call a loved one. Take it from me. The twists and turns of life really put things into perspective at times.


Airborne

: Traveling back home today and then catching up on the weekend. Blog lite.

Transparency

: The news business demands transparency of the world it covers and now has to learn to be transparent itself. They're not taking to the lesson easily.

After Rathergate, CBS should be opening all its doors and drawers to rebuild its credibility. But RatherBiased.com reports that some execs do not want to release the full investigative report on Rathergate being done now. That' would be numbnutty in the extreme.

And Dan Okrent writes in today's NY Times Public Editor column that Times editors are having problems learning that they should be talking about the paper with the paper's public.

Here's an idea: if the editors did the explaining themselves, maybe I wouldn't have to do it for them.

For decades, the Fraternal Order of Falsely Modest Newspaper People has marched under an indelible banner: "We're not the story," it says. "The story's the story." ...

I suppose the speak-for-itself trope made sense back when the image of the American newspaper was embodied in a freckled newsboy tossing a rolled paper onto a porch hung with geraniums. But in an age when the press is so widely regarded as a predatory and uncontrolled beast, the failure to allow readers a view inside the cage can only aggravate their worst suspicions.

No sex, please, we're American

: Frank Rich has another good column on the prigs' and prudes' war on sex and popular culture -- and free speech and the First Amendment and the Constitution and democracy, while they're at it.

No matter what the censors may accomplish elsewhere, the pop culture revolution since Kinsey's era is in little jeopardy: in a nation of "Desperate Housewives," "Too Darn Hot" has become the national anthem. A movie like "Kinsey" will do just fine; the more protests, the more publicity and the larger the box office. But if Hollywood will always survive, off-screen Americans are being damaged by the cultural war over sex that is being played out in real life. You see that when struggling kids are denied the same information about sexuality that was kept from their antecedents in the pre-Kinsey era; you see that when pharmacists in more and more states enforce their own "moral values" by refusing to fill women's contraceptive prescriptions and do so with the tacit or official approval of local officials; you see it when basic information that might prevent the spread of lethal diseases is suppressed by the government because it favors political pandering over scientific fact.

Archives:
06/05 ... 05/05 ... 04/05 ... 03/05 ... 02/05 ... 01/05 ... 12/04 ... 11/04 ... 10/04 ... 09/04 ... 08/04 ... 07/04 ... 06/04 ... 05/04 ... 04/04 ... 03/04 ... 02/04 ... 01/04 ... 12/03 ... 11/03 ... 10/03 ... 09/03 ... 08/03 ... 07/03 ... 06/03 ... 05/03 ... 04/03 ... 03/03 ... 02/03 ... 01/03 ... 12/02 ... 11/02 ... 10/02 ... 09/02 ... 08/02 ... 07/02 ... 06/02 ... 05/02 ... 04/02 ... 03/02/a ... 03/02/b ... 02/02 ... 01/02 ... 12/01 ... 11/01 ... 10/01 ... 09/01 ... Current Home



. . .