I said so on Air America's Morning Sedition yesterday -- though I also quoted Zephyr Teachout when she told me that she liked what Bush said but wasn't sure he was the president to do it. [pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
Still, this seemed to be a speech with vision, a doctrine with courage. I was eager to see how he carried it out with North Korea, Saudi Arabia... you name the undemocratic nation. [pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
Yet already, there's spin from the White House -- the kind of spin you see when somebody tries to pedal backwards. Howard Kurtz captures it:
You might think that calling on the United States to spread freedom around the globe and stand against tyranny might have consequences.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
It was a statement of ideals.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
But what does the president plan to do to carry out those ideals?[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
There will be no change in administration policy.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
But how can Bush call for action against regimes that oppress their people and still do business with the dictators of China, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan?[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
The goals the president set forth can only be met over a generation, not in a year or two.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
Then was the speech just meaningless rhetoric?[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
It was an attempt to lay out his strategic vision about moral choices.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
So we shouldn't take his words seriously?[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
The president believes in bold action to advance the cause of freedom.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
But if he doesn't take any practical steps, won't he have failed to clear the bar he set for himself?[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
It was a statement of ideals.
Homeless
: The New York Post and The New York Times editorial pages almost agree that the homless should not be making the New York subway their home after a fire apparently started by one of them caused damage and disruption that will take months or even years to fix. The Post started it in an editorial:
Let's face it: Some subway-station bum starts a fire, probably to warm his tootsies, and subway riders suffer for years.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
He's culpable, of course, even if he is crazy as a loon.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
But blame for this fiasco also must accrue to those who have made the notion that "homelessness" is just an "alternative lifestyle" into public policy — which insanely grants vagrants the right to take up residence anywhere they damn please....[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
Was the perp just crazy? Was it deliberate arson? Or just carelessness or recklessness, a street-dweller trying to stay warm in sub-freezing temperatures? Or smoking a cigarette (or something else)?[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
Does it really matter?[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
New York City spends hundreds of millions of dollars every year to feed, clothe, shelter and provide all manner of services to needy street folk.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
When they resist help, their self-appointed "advocates" rise to defend their "rights" to do so.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
What do these "advocates" say now, when millions will have to suffer, likely for years, so that the "rights" of a single lunatic could be preserved?[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
For years, responsible New Yorkers (including us) have argued that these people are a danger to themselves and others (not to mention, a daily blight).[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
If they refuse good-faith help, they need to be hauled off to Rikers Island.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
For the benefit of law-abiding New Yorkers, if not for their own sake.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
Cruel? Hardly.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
After all, there's a lot more heat and food at Rikers than on the streets.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
Living in the city's nooks and crannies — on a subway platform near a signal station, for example — must be a crime.[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
New Yorkers should be boiling at the thought that one man could be allowed to cause pain for millions, so he can exercise his right maybe to freeze to death.
And The Times editorializes today:
The subway is also no place for the homeless, and it's a sign of the system's shaky state that hundreds of people have been allowed to live in its grapevine of tunnels and passageways. It is not safe for them and, as Sunday's fire makes clear, it is not safe for the millions who ride through those tunnels every single day. The city's police and homeless outreach programs need to be mobilized right away.
Well, The Times isn't going for that Rikers Island solution but it is at least agreeing that the homeless shouldn't be living in the subway. [pP]>
serial edonkey pro 1.4
Rudy Guliani was the first politician in New York to have the guts to deal with this issue; other cities (I'm thinking of you, San Francisco) haven't. [pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
And the real issue isn't homelessness. It's insanity. The laws in this country make it impossible to commit and help even the obvioulsy and often the dangerously insane. [pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
I say that One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest is as much at fault as any politician, for it made the institution frightening and the people who run it bad guys. [pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
Guliani saw that because of the fear of the rubber room, we ended up with a doctrine that said it's a right to lose your mind but he said it's not a right to interfere with the lives of people around you. [pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
He got rid of the squeegee men years ago -- and personally, I was relieved, for a bunch of them attacked my car one night and tried to drag me out of it, sending my wife into premature labor. It is a danger. [pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
The fact that people are living in the subways of New York is, in the end, a dereliction of our duty to these people. The Post and The Times are both right. Now let's do something about it. [pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
: UPDATE: Glenn Reynolds and Helen Reynolds have much more here. [pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
Damned ice dam
: I just spent the last two nights on a roof banging at ice-filled gutters on the roof above because ice is backing up under the roof and melting and dripping and driving us crazy: Jersey water torture. I hate heights. So I feared falling; I feared huge hunks of ice and gutter falling on my head; and because I fear looking like a dork, I refused my wife's suggestion that I wear a bike helmet. And now it's snowing again. Call me when winter's over. [pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
Should I consider a metal roof?[pP]>serial edonkey pro 1.4
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...